This is the forum section where we discuss current and upcoming Google smartphones of interest to S4GRU members.
27 topics in this forum
-
- 147 replies
- 5,921 views
-
- 33 replies
- 1,222 views
-
- 179 replies
- 9,523 views
-
- 195 replies
- 13,319 views
-
- 7 replies
- 320 views
-
- 2 replies
- 714 views
-
- 10 replies
- 262 views
-
- 901 replies
- 34,713 views
-
- 9,798 replies
- 476,830 views
-
- 437 replies
- 22,505 views
-
- 6 replies
- 685 views
-
- 1,081 replies
- 58,192 views
-
- 269 replies
- 13,962 views
-
- 53 replies
- 3,361 views
-
- 419 replies
- 26,577 views
-
- 0 replies
- 4,784 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1,563 views
-
- 791 replies
- 36,727 views
-
- 247 replies
- 17,168 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1,755 views
-
- 1,756 replies
- 114,242 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1,193 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1,615 views
-
- 193 replies
- 15,486 views
-
- 5 replies
- 768 views
-
-
New Topics
-
-
Trending Topics
-
-
Recent Posts
-
By Brad The Beast · Posted
It would. There isn't anything that supports uplink 3CA though. 25+41 uplink CA should really help, especially in places where they have 15x15 band 25. -
Considering how all pro merger folks paint them out to be, you'd think the sky is falling, but on the contrary, they are doing quite well with limited resources. In fact, if they started CA B25/B26+B41 would solve 90% of the issues involved with slower uploads and reliability. -
By Brad The Beast · Posted
They were second for average download speeds. The problem is their piss poor uploads, latency, reliability, and consistency. They won in Portland because they were consistent and they tied in SLC. Everywhere else was a loss. I wouldn't say that they did excellent. I would say they did ok at best.
-
-
Recently Browsing
No registered users viewing this page.
