Jump to content

Google Nexus 6 by Motorola (Was "Nexus X talk leaked?")


smorcy11

Recommended Posts

Sorry but I stopped reading once I saw who the leak supposedly came from.

 

I'm not familiar with the author at all...

 

I realize the details are all up in the air at this point... does he have a history of being completely inaccurate? Wonder if there's enough evidence to at least point to the device and launch timeframe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the author at all...

 

I realize the details are all up in the air at this point... does he have a history of being completely inaccurate? Wonder if there's enough evidence to at least point to the device and launch timeframe?

 

BGR has lost a lot of respect in the tech community. It's just gotten ridiculous.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BGR has lost a lot of respect in the tech community. It's just gotten ridiculous.

 

Right.  And they are citing TKTechNews.  That's the site that repeatedly posted lies from purported Sprint sources that they were getting rid of Unlimited.  Of course, that never came to be.  Especially with Sprint creating two new Unlimited plans since.  The articles were extremely unjournalistic and were awful obvious smear jobs against Sprint.  The site owner often would block comments that would outline facts about his errors.

 

So an article from BGR is a shaky source.  A BGR article citing TKTN should be outright ignored.

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the author at all...

 

I realize the details are all up in the air at this point... does he have a history of being completely inaccurate? Wonder if there's enough evidence to at least point to the device and launch timeframe?

Dude is as childish as an 8 year old not to mention he couldn't be any less unprofessional in his attitude.  If he was a baseball player his batting average would be .000

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.  And they are citing TKTechNews.  That's the site that repeatedly posted lies from purported Sprint sources that they were getting rid of Unlimited.  Of course, that never came to be.  Especially with Sprint creating two new Unlimited plans since.  The articles were extremely unjournalistic and were awful obvious smear jobs against Sprint.  The site owner often would block comments that would outline facts about his errors.

 

So an article from BGR is a shaky source.  A BGR article citing TKTN should be outright ignored.

 

Robert

 

Yeah. Makes it worse.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we get a Motorola Nexus handset, I sincerely hope it reports LTE bands incorrectly.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

getting tired of all the Nexus rumors... need some real announcements soon. Ready to move on from my Note 3.

 

http://9to5google.com/2014/09/24/exclusive-this-is-shamu-motorolas-upcoming-nexus-6x/

I'm still disappointed about the Moto X. This looks close to it but 5.9" is really too big for my taste.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Size of rumored phone doesn't bother me, i own Note 3. I am tired of the bloatware and want a Nexus with lots of space 32gb or 64gb. I actually like the 2nd gen Moto X, but its a no go so far. Looking forward to this Nexus as long as the space is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a huge phone. Probably a little too much, even for phablet lovers.

 

Not for me! Since I have to use two hands with a 5.5+in screen anyway, bring on the 7 inch phones! I can fit a nexus 7 in my pocket, anything larger than that will require the purchase of new pants.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a huge phone. Probably a little too much, even for phablet lovers.

I don't know. The 5.5 inch note screen is only 0.4 inches smaller than a 5.9 inch screen. Unless you have huge bezels it shouldn't be that much bigger.

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...