Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Users Thread!


nexgencpu

Recommended Posts

I just read this article that states April 21st it begins

 

http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/548511/20140417/nexus-5-4-7-android-3-kitkat.htm#.U0-w6cso4m8

That article just regurgitates everything else flying around. First of all, it cites the Android Police report, which just cites Sprint's "it will start on 4/14 and be done by 4/21" statement. And the IBT article claims that Sprint has already "silently slipped" 4.4.3 to its customers. Back-to-back contradictory sentences.

 

I personally find IBT articles to either be completely baseless and rumor-provoking, or just a reprint of another site's article, often with some misinterpretations thrown in.

 

I want the N5 update, but poorly-written articles aren't going to change the facts. Sprint expected Google to start rolling it out on Monday, and it does not appear to have started yet. That's really all we know about the schedule.

 

-Mike

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Officially past googles self quoted markers of 24-48 hours and 1%.

 

Were actually closer to 72 hours if Monday morning was actually correct. What was the next threshold? 10% ? That way more than enough XDA/nerdy N5 owners to share the ota URL.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go into the play store, go to the top left menu, go to settings, go to Auto-update apps, click "Do not auto-update apps". That value is set to "Auto-update apps over Wi-Fi only" by default.

This is a very good idea, since it allows you to view any new permissions apps need. I haven't updated Facebook for about 3 months now because the newer versions want access to your dialer and text messages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very good idea, since it allows you to view any new permissions apps need. I haven't updated Facebook for about 3 months now because the newer versions want access to your dialer and text messages.

it doesn't auto update apps that have new permissions, just the ones that keep the same permissions.  The others it gives you a notification that certain apps are waiting to be updated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Officially past googles self quoted markers of 24-48 hours and 1%.

 

Were actually closer to 72 hours if Monday morning was actually correct. What was the next threshold? 10% ? That way more than enough XDA/nerdy N5 owners to share the ota URL.

 

Google would have posted the system image on their website if it had started rolling it out, even to the first 1%. That has not happened yet, and no users have confirmed receipt of an OTA on XDA/Twitter/etc, so it looks like it hasn't started at all yet.

 

What day does google start rollouts usually?  Monday?

 

Individual app updates usually come out on Wednesday. System/Android updates have not seemed to be specific to a day of the week.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be nice, but I've always thought it made more sense to roll things out early in the week, in case there are issues with it.  I know that doesn't matter TOO much, but it's always seemed (at least in my head) to be the most prudent course of action.

 

Hoping I'm wrong, and the two of you above me are right.  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pulling an update involves flipping a switch. Now patching a bad update can take any length of time.

 

I've always though it would be a good idea to roll the update out first to people who have enabled developer settings.

 

Very easy to implement but prob would never happen .

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still here

 

 

Really?  It was there earlier today but now it isn't showing the update for me.  It says the current version is KRT49H. 

 

I know that the important update is the google factory image page.  I just thought it might be a sign that sprint finally heard something from Google about the delay.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?  It was there earlier today but now it isn't showing the update for me.  It says the current version is KRT49H. 

 

I know that the important update is the google factory image page.  I just thought it might be a sign that sprint finally heard something from Google about the delay.  

 

Looks like the page was just refreshed. It has been pulled. You're right.

 

First time I looked it was still there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the page was just refreshed. It has been pulled. You're right.

 

First time I looked it was still there.

 

Ditto, and I had refreshed it a few times just in case. Must have multiple servers and it took awhile. It's still a typo anyway, the current version is KOT49H, not KRT49H.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time I see a huge amount of notifications for new posts in this thread in a short amount of time I get excited that a download link was posted.....and then it isnt.  Keeping me on my toes!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, that's a bummer. I would guess we are looking at the end of April, based on the "dogfooding" report of a week ago.

 

At least we can be fairly confident now that the Spark update will be included in 4.4.3. 

 

I think this is all Adam G's fault. Dan made him a promise that it would be released on Monday, and he had to follow through, even though it wasn't his promise to make, but Google's!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...