Jump to content

Paynefanbro

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Content Count

    4,409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Paynefanbro last won the day on April 4

Paynefanbro had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,777 Wireless Expert

About Paynefanbro

  • Rank
    Member Level: LTE Advanced
  • Birthday November 15

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    Samsung GS9+
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Brooklyn, NY and Boston, MA
  • Here for...
    4G Information

Recent Profile Visitors

13,683 profile views
  1. I honestly have no idea. It's not the norm in my experience. Has the drop in call performance been noticeable for you or do you think it was a fluke?
  2. It's not the lowband, it's their upload speeds that will always kill them in independent testing like this. The exception is PCMag who weighs upload speeds way less than download speeds.
  3. If Sprint can just prove to CNET and others that you don't need to be within line of site of a cell site to get decent speeds, they'll already be ahead of the pack even if they can't provide gigabit peaks like VZW. For these Verizon tests the press were encouraged to stand a certain distance away from the site and to face the antenna, etc. Sprint should just give the device to them and tell them they can roam free.
  4. 5G coverage is shown on the coverage map for the first round of cities. (Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, and Kansas City) https://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?
  5. Tests of Verizon's 5G network using the S10 5G are significantly better in terms of throughput but coverage is still not the greatest. Max speeds of 1.3Gbps. https://www.cnet.com/news/galaxy-s10-5g-speeds-past-1gbps-in-our-real-world-verizon-tests/
  6. If you go to HTC's website you'll see it has support for pretty much every U.S. LTE band, so no.
  7. A few more details now that Sprint has announced a release date for the 5G Hub.
  8. Yeah. Looking online people are saying that it brought the April security update. I must've imagined seeing April before the update.
  9. I just got an update on my unlocked S10+ but I don't know what it was for. It's still on the April security patch.
  10. I was taking a look at the HTC 5G Hub that's supposed to be launching on Sprint sometime this month. It looks like it could technically be Sprint's first foray into the WISP space. On HTC's site they mention it as a sort of replacement for your WiFi router with the ability to connect up to 20 devices to it. I wonder what data caps will be on this when it launches and what they plan on charging people for using it? It seems to be a lot of things smashed into one device. It's combining a wireless router, a streaming box, and a cloud gaming device all into one. It also has support for pretty much every U.S. LTE band. https://www.htc.com/us/5g/htc-5g-hub/
  11. 1. Each hardware manufacturer will have to come up with their own DSS implementation since Ericsson's DSS only works on Ericsson hardware meaning that only portions of networks using Ericsson equipment will be able to utilize it for now. Additionally, I'm doubtful that Steve Scarlett is trying to spread FUD about it considering it would be in their best interest to implement it as well for their hardware, he's just being realistic about the drawbacks of it. 2. The network upgrade is DSS since it's a software upgrade for 5G compatible radios. 3. I don't see anywhere that they used an "off the shelf 4G smartphone" for their test. Their press release says they used an Intel 5G device at MWC. DSS is merely a stopgap until carriers can get fresh mid-band spectrum to deploy 5G on or shut down their LTE networks completely in favor of 5G-NR.
  12. Spectrum Sharing also requires compatible devices on the handset side. The more I read about it, the less it seems like the saving grace it was made out to be.
  13. C-band is further from becoming a reality than CBRS is right now considering there still hasn't been a decision made about if satellite operators should be able to sell it or if it should be auctioned off. And even then, it'll probably cost an arm and a leg to acquire. CBRS is shared spectrum that will likely be split up into a ton of chunks which doesn't exactly make it pristine mid-band spectrum. Sprint's advantage is that 2.5GHz not only has better propagation characteristics, but that the whole 120MHz+ is available to them virtually nationwide. The main advantage of CBRS is that it will likely be the first "global" 5G band and will be useful for roaming purposes. For that reason, I could see Sprint along with every other carrier and cable co trying to get some of it.
×
×
  • Create New...