Jump to content


S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Paynefanbro last won the day on December 30 2020

Paynefanbro had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5,269 Wireless Expert

About Paynefanbro

  • Rank
    Member Level: LTE Advanced

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    Unlocked iPhone 12 Pro Max
  • Gender
  • Location
    Brooklyn, NY
  • Here for...
    4G Information

Recent Profile Visitors

16,054 profile views
  1. T-Mobile will still have vastly more mid-band spectrum on average nationwide compared to Verizon and AT&T post-auction. That's in addition to having the device ecosystem and site hardware already deployed and ever expanding. Assuming Verizon or AT&T deploys C-band at the same pace that T-Mobile is deploying BRS/EBS currently, they'll still be at least 100 Million POPs behind T-Mobile by year end in addition to having less capacity than T-Mobile.
  2. In Verizon's most recent network update they say this about their 5G home service "It’s super fast, with max download speeds of up to 1 Gbps, depending on location, with typical download speeds of 300 Mbps." https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-2021-more-5g Suddenly T-Mobile comparing their midband to Verizon's mmWave makes a lot more sense.
  3. It's already on in some areas but it's not nationwide like n71. It probably won't be any time soon though. The main reason why SA n71 arrived so fast is because T-Mobile's choice to only deploy spectrum as needed came back to bite them. Currently T-Mobile's anchor bands for 5G are 2/4/66. In many rural areas, the only bands T-Mobile has available on their sites are Band 12 and Band 71 because they were deploying for coverage first and capacity second. This meant that if they didn't enable SA 5G they would have a bunch of sites that have perfectly capable 5G antennas and that are actually
  4. T-Mobile has the coverage lead right now and I think they're gonna milk that for as long as possible, especially since they've found a way to market their mid-band network against AT&T and Verizon's mmWave networks. I would expect updates every once in a while to rub it in. It's interesting that you pointed out that they didn't say 200 million covered in this announcement but instead said "nationwide". One thing that's for certain is that it's a lot harder to get to 200 million covered than it is to get to 100 million. Covering the top 15 metro areas covers 108 Million. They'd need to
  5. 6Mbps is definitely out of the norm. Even on the horrible Band 4/66 oDAS that they have in my neighborhood I'm able to pull speeds in the teens at peak hours. Are you only connecting to Band 2? The sites around 3rd Ave and Tremont in the Bronx all have Band 2/4/66/12/71 and there's at least one site with Band 41 according to Cellmapper.. I would expect much better performance than that. Maybe you should try a network settings reset or something like that.
  6. Couple of updates about T-Mobile's network in the areas I've been recently. Crown Heights, Brooklyn: In northern Crown Heights a bunch of sites that missed out on n41 upgrades in late October/early November have recently received upgrades to include both n41 and n71. n41 coverage is now contiguous enough that you can travel across virtually the entirety of northern Crown Heights without dropping out of midband coverage now. DUMBO, Brooklyn: T-Mobile still hasn't upgraded any of the sites in DUMBO. The area is almost entirely LTE only except for if you're near the waterfront where you'll
  7. Hey! Unfortunately I don't know if there's any way on OnePlus devices to view 5G information without rooting it. The best you can do is use an app like Cellmapper or SignalCheck Pro which would show you exactly when you're connected to 5G but they don't report what 5G band it is unless your phone is connected to SA 5G.
  8. The same thing happened in NYC but T-Mobile is a bit more spectrum constrained on BRS/EBS here so Band 41 was reduced from three carriers to two carriers and at the same time n41 was increased from 40MHz to 60MHz to prevent the NR carrier from overlapping with the LTE carrier.
  9. The day is finally here it looks like. T-Mobile officially did the swap and made n41 60MHz across NYC and reduced Sprint's Band 41 to 40MHz. Upload speeds while connected to n41 have gone up significantly for me. I'm now getting up to 95Mbps up in my house. According to OP it looks like in parts of the outer boroughs, post-Sprint Band 41 shutdown they'll be able to expand to 100MHz. 100MHz of n41 is the GSMA's recommendation for mid-band 5G. At that point we'd likely be able to get multi-gigabit speeds. Wherever they can't get a contiguous 100MHz they might try to buy CBRS to a
  10. I'm thinking that it's mostly late-clearing because they're in no rush to deploy the spectrum. What it does say to me is that between Verizon and AT&T bidding heavily for the 100MHz of early-clearing spectrum and Comcast spending even more than Verizon on (if I'm correct) mostly late clearing spectrum, Verizon isn't likely having the runaway auction that many anticipated. I'm still expecting 100MHz nationwide on average but probably not many markets over that amount. I'm also curious to know what markets T-Mobile purchase C-band in. I'm hoping one of them is NYC as our BRS/EBS spectru
  11. It's being estimated that T-Mobile has spent $4 Billion on C-band so far. I'm most surprised to see that Dish hasn't spent more. While I'm not surprised that Comcast and Charter have spent a ton I didn't expect them to spend more than Verizon. I wonder what they plan to do with all of this spectrum that they're hoarding.
  12. At that point I don’t understand why they don’t just shut off HSPA+ nationwide and just go fully GSM/LTE only. There are plenty of markets where they’re still running it when that extra spectrum could boost LTE capacity.
  13. Did a lot of driving (but sadly no mapping) today in NYC, Long Island, and up to Woodbury. Brooklyn to Westbury: 5G 98% of the time. About two small drops along the Northern State and one drop in Brooklyn near the intersection of Fulton and Eastern Parkway. Westbury to Woodbury: 5G about 60% of the time. Driving through Long Island, Queens, and the Bronx I rarely left 5G coverage but once I got north of the Bronx I found myself dropping to LTE a lot more frequently. Sometimes it was simply because T-Mobile didn't have n71 on the site and other times it was because signal strength was
  14. Interesting choice by T-Mobile to unite mmWave and mid-band 5G under a single name. It seems like they're doing so specifically to counteract Verizon's marketing message around mmWave. Verizon emphasizes UWB as high capacity and super high speed and now it seems like T-Mobile is saying the same for n41 with the added bonus of greater coverage. The only thing that worries me about this is that it seems like T-Mobile may be using this new name to de-emphasize their own mmWave network. It's not like T-Mobile doesn't have the spectrum, they just don't want to deploy it.
  15. Does anyone know what that big panel with the split in it is on this T-Mobile site?
  • Create New...