Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

And AT&T would not be doing this if it wasn't for Google Fiber.

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

And that's the point. A lot of people around Charlotte don't get that. Google doesn't want to be your ISP. They want to force your ISP to be better.
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the end of the road:  http://online.wsj.com/articles/sprint-abandoning-pursuit-of-t-mobile-1407279448

 

Masa, now it's time to take Sprint to the next level on your own!

 

Robert

 

Thanks Neal for the heads up!

 

 

Like I was telling Deval this morning. If Masa want scale and larger nework, I honestly believe Sprint needs to focus on the CCA as they complete the build out of NV. They (Sprint) need to strategize and and laser focus on buying up the CCA partners slowly and strategically and fold their network architecture into NV along the way.  

 

The CCA agreement buys Sprint time, since the roaming will be treated as Native Coverage. Make no mistake however, it is not an end all solution. Once the political climate changes Verizon will start eating away at the CCA partners and Sprint will be left with the "WTF" look on their faces, AGAIN, just like when Verizon ate Alltel. Masa/Sprint must play Verizon's game, if he was willing to buy TMO, the resources are there to do this very calculating. I believe this approach would have much easier time passing DOJ and FCC hurdles as the Gov seems mostly focused on keep 4 national carriers, little guys are up for grabs especially since Sprint would be able to make the same case about needing more "scale".  

 

Sprint can easily still win here, in my book... but they need to execute and remain focused on fixing the Network.

 

EDIT: Come to think of it.... If these guys were smart, I would divide and conquer... with Masa handling the CCA and starting the talks of acquiring the partners. While Claure focuses more on Sprint itself and fixing the brand. 

 

 

 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And AT&T would not be doing this if it wasn't for Google Fiber.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Oh absolutely. They were perfectly happy being #2 in speed but slightly cheaper when bundled than TWC for about 15 years. Considering they had a nearly 30% revenue gain from Uverse last year I am not surprised they are fighting to keep competitive. It won't work though. 

 

Anyways, I am happy the bid fell through even though it would have been pretty awesome for Nexus 5 users like myself. I hope Sprint goes back to the drawing board with their framily plans and either makes the $25 threshold lower or makes the whole process less weird. I also wish corporate discounts were applied differently rather than just to the extra data portion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Correct.   You will not be able to provide any proof of this.   Sprint did not ever own Embarq and they were not required to sell their local division to create Embarq.  They sold off their local division because they wanted to.

Already did my mea culpa on that one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know :). In other news FCC chairman Wheeler had to have his two cents in:

 

"Four national wireless providers is good for American consumers," Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler said in an emailed statement. "Sprint now has an opportunity to focus their efforts on robust competition."

 

This is highly unusual for an FCC chairman to comment on an unannounced merger. Good job chairman! The two smaller ones can drive each other into the ground with lower prices and not have enough money to bid on your auctions so that AT&T and Verizon can again dominate the spectrum wars. Yep, let them split the 20% of EBITDA that the Big Two don't already claim.

:goodpost:

 

Although I wasn't really for the merger, waffling between hell no and it wouldn't be the end of the world, your post was excellent. I'm disliking Chairman Wheeler more and more. His moves have mostly done more to ensure the Duopoly to reduce competition.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the caveat is AT&T doesn't want you having unlimited use on U-Verse with out paying a hefty fee. SO what good is a 1gb connection if you can't use it to it's fullest extent with out running into a AT&T cap?

 

Or there being any use for a gigabit...  or 100 megabit...  or 50 megabit...

 

Oh absolutely. They were perfectly happy being #2 in speed but slightly cheaper when bundled than TWC for about 15 years. Considering they had a nearly 30% revenue gain from Uverse last year I am not surprised they are fighting to keep competitive. It won't work though. 

 

Anyways, I am happy the bid fell through even though it would have been pretty awesome for Nexus 5 users like myself. I hope Sprint goes back to the drawing board with their framily plans and either makes the $25 threshold lower or makes the whole process less weird. I also wish corporate discounts were applied differently rather than just to the extra data portion. 

 

Would you rather just have free service? At some point, lower price certainly means worse service.

 

whenthey spun off Embarq they saddled them with debt?

 

Landline operations are VERY debt intensive. VZ has been shedding their more rural landline operations for years to reduce that burden.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Son should be talking to the rural partners for a potential sale or Verizon will come from behind, and buy them all one by one.

 

Let the new ceo focus on the company image, marketing, prices and network. John Saw so far has been impressive in charge of the roll out. You got those guys focusing in the company now you can devote your energy buying the rural partners.

Edited by SprintNYC
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Landline operations are VERY debt intensive. VZ has been shedding their more rural landline operations for years to reduce that burden.

Just trying to establish that there was a method behind the madness. So i guess Sprint saddled them with more debt than they could get in a sale. It was probably the right decision at the time but it has come back to haunt them. To add insult to injury, Centurylink is not doing to bad outside of its debt. http://ir.centurylink.com/QuarterlyResults.aspx?iid=4057179

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So - do we think Monday will be a status quo type week? Or will he make any customer facing changes.

 

Not saying anything drastic. But it would be "setteling" to see a plan of attack.

 

Maybe by October would be more realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So - do we think Monday will be a status quo type week? Or will he make any customer facing changes.

 

Not saying anything drastic. But it would be "setteling" to see a plan of attack.

I don't think you will see any "customer facing changes" this week, but i'd be somewhat surprised if we don't hear from Masa and Claure within the next week or two. After spending the better chunk of this year advocating why a merger was absolutely necessary to take on the duopoly, they need to come out and demonstrate that they have a plan B (and they do). Masa hinted at it in the press release "While we continue to believe industry consolidation will enhance competitiveness and benefit customers, our focus moving forward will be on making Sprint the most successful carrier."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you will see any "customer facing changes" this week, but i'd be somewhat surprised if we don't hear from Masa and Claure within the next week or two. After spending the better chunk of this year advocating why a merger was absolutely necessary to take on the duopoly, they need to come out and demonstrate that they have a plan B (and they do).

They both will probably speak at the Sprint Edge event

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 After spending the better chunk of this year advocating why a merger was absolutely necessary to take on the duopoly, they need to come out and demonstrate that they have a plan B (and they do).

 

I wish the blogs and media would understand this.  Masa and Claure are very successful businessmen.  Dropping the T-Mobile bid and canning Hesse was not a snap decision. My feeling is this has been calculated for some time.  They have known for a while the regulatory climate was leaning against the merger.  My guess the ruling on joint bidding the auction was the last straw that set the plan in motion.  I think they do have a new plan ready to go and we will hear something about it sooner rather then later.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stock is trading at $5.89 a share.  Buy baby, buy!

Moving funds now... just pulled the trigger at 5.84

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Would you rather just have free service? At some point, lower price certainly means worse service.

 

 

Who wouldn't want free service? Flippant questions aside, I want a competitive Sprint and right now their framily plan loses to the current T-Mobile 4 lines @ $100 for 10 GB data (2.5 GB each line). Even with a 7 person framily you would only get 4 lines @$100 for 4 GB of data (1 GB each line). So in my eyes Sprint either needs to revamp framily or entice users to purchase higher data limits with better pricing/discounts there. In addition to that the burden for a new user to get that $25 line is higher at Sprint than T-Mobile as a direct comparison would have the Sprint customers paying either $160 for 4 lines @ 1GB or $200 for 4 lines @ 3GB each. By some metrics Sprint DOES have worse service already and as a customer I expect pricing in line with T-Mobile rather than the superior networks that AT&T and Verizon offer. 

 

 

The massive profits in the industry will continue to be divided 3/4ths or more between the duopoly and leave Sprint and T-Mobile fighting for the rest until they can offer a truly competitive network. T-Mobile is much further from this than Sprint in terms of a true nationwide network but they absolutely do have a blazing fast network in core metro areas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So - do we think Monday will be a status quo type week? Or will he make any customer facing changes.

 

Not saying anything drastic. But it would be "setteling" to see a plan of attack.

 

Maybe by October would be more realistic.

 

 

As much as I'd like a quick response and fast action within one week, I don't see that happening. I agree that October would be more realistic. There's more overhead associated with a move like this in a corporation other than coming up with a plan of attack, like assessing organizational structure and current leadership.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is Sprint going to rollout 8T8R faster now? Implement a second PCS channel? Swap some spectrum with Dish? Host Dish's spectrum?

 

It will be interesting to watch.

 

 

"In the short-term, we will focus on becoming extremely cost efficient and competing aggressively in the marketplace," Claure said. http://www.cnet.com/news/sprint-taps-brightstar-ceo-claure-as-new-ceo/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish the blogs and media would understand this.  Masa and Claure are very successful businessmen.  Dropping the T-Mobile bid and canning Hesse was not a snap decision. My feeling is this has been calculated for some time.  They have known for a while the regulatory climate was leaning against the merger.  My guess the ruling on joint bidding the auction was the last straw that set the plan in motion.  I think they do have a new plan ready to go and we will hear something about it sooner rather then later.

 

The thing with Hesse was probably more stability under the new ownership during the transitional period vs. Masa coming right out and installing his leadership.

 

This happens all the time in business and pro sports, with Football being a great example. If a head coach or general manager is fired/quits, the named replacement makes due for a while until he can install his own people to run parts of the organization (in the case of a head coach, naming his coordinators, position coaches, etc).

 

(Yes, I am ready for football to start.)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to watch.

 

 

"In the short-term, we will focus on becoming extremely cost efficient and competing aggressively in the marketplace," Claure said. http://www.cnet.com/news/sprint-taps-brightstar-ceo-claure-as-new-ceo/

Hmm that sounds to be talking out of both sides of the mouth. Isn't it hard to compete with vzw and att on price yet be cost efficient. I suppose maybe I'm thinking margins and efficiency are linked.

 

But I hope they do get better plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm that sounds to be talking out of both sides of the mouth. Isn't it hard to compete with vzw and att on price yet be cost efficient. I suppose maybe I'm thinking margins and efficiency are linked.

 

But I hope they do get better plans.

Not necessarily. I bet Sprint wastes a lot of money on things with little or no return. Sprint needs to be efficient, especially if it wants to lower prices and continue to move toward a consistent high quality network, nationwide.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...