Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

Lol. Been looking and can't find it. I guess I remembered incorrectly :)

I wonder why they shed it. I wonder if they saw it as a dying business. But then that would bring up the question as to way they did not cash out and sell it versus spinning it off into a company that did not need to maintain a relationship with Sprint. Fun fact...Hesse was CEO of Embarq before he became Sprints CEO.

They shed it because unless you're defrauding USF, landlines are a losing proposition outside of urban centers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still wonder why they would spin it off and not sell it outright. Or spin it off as a subsidiary. As it stands they gave it away, got nothing in return and lost the ability to add back-haul on their own in many markets. That ended up being a lose lose proposition.

They also lost a metric shit ton of debt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I should rephrase; In response to Google Fiber, AT&T has been promising 1Gbs broadband connections. Which to me means that they have to bring fiber much closer to the home.

I believe that is only to keep GOogle and regulators at bay. Google and the ILECs are playing a game here. Google will just enough to get the ILECs to do FTTH everywhere and the ILECs will do just enough to get Google to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really liked Hesse and what he did to save Sprint. He had an incredibly difficult job when he took over Sprint Nextel, definitely the hardest job in wireless. He saved the company but not much else (I don't know if anyone could have done better but Sprint hasn't made any forward progress under Hesse). With that said I think NV 1.0 has been something of a minor debacle and far from the company rejuvenating move is was billed as. Hesse is where the responsibility lies , if not the fault.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://investors.sprint.com/file.aspx?IID=4057219&FID=24739581&printable=1

 

This has been a wonderful first few days of the week. First I find out that my next phone is being announced on sept 9th, then I found out the merger is DONE, then I found out we have a new CEO who will hopefully express the urgency and persistence of Masa, and 800 acceptances are coming to Florida. 

 

My face after all of this. zsocJwTa.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts exactly!

 

http://investors.sprint.com/file.aspx?IID=4057219&FID=24739581&printable=1

 

This has been a wonderful first few days of the week. First I find out that my next phone is being announced on sept 9th, then I found out the merger is DONE, then I found out we have a new CEO who will hopefully express the urgency and persistence of Masa, and 800 acceptances are coming to Florida. 

 

My face after all of this. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just bought a crapload more shares in Sprint at around $5.95

 

The stock is getting slaughtered. Thus, I would be shocked if a big buyer such as Softbank or institutional investor does not swoop in and take a big stake.

 

The stock market now values the total business of Sprint at almost the same amount as T-Mobile US:  ~$28 billion

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that Sprint is out of the picture, Iliad will continue to pursue its $33-per-share offer for 56.6% of the T-Mobile US.

 

Softbank's $40-per-share offer is gone, TMUS is now trading in the $30 range, and the stock was trading at $26 before news of Sprint's offer last December. With some more partners such as Dish, Iliad might succeed.

 

http://online.wsj.com/articles/iliad-to-forge-ahead-with-t-mobile-bid-1407329989

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just bought a crapload more shares in Sprint at around $5.95

 

The stock is getting slaughtered. Thus, I would be shocked if a big buyer such as Softbank or institutional investor does not swoop in and take a big stake.

 

The stock market now values the total business of Sprint at almost the same amount as T-Mobile US:  ~$28 billion

 

I can't get money into my USAA Brokerage account fast enough. LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From one of the last interviews I saw, it looked like Hesse was done and he all but said he was leaving. He did lead Sprint into making some smart moves, ie Network Vision, Clearwire, etc.

Edited by MkVsTheWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any delayed microwave builds would have been Sprint's own fault as that was their own builds. The microwave in my area was available literally years before the fiber was.

Not necessarily. There are contracted backhaul microwave vendors for Sprint in many places. And if there is a backhaul problem at the connection point, well, then, there is not going be any backhaul carried by microwave to begin with.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC as a provision of the Nextel merger Sprint had to sell of Embarq.

Not Correct.   You will not be able to provide any proof of this.   Sprint did not ever own Embarq and they were not required to sell their local division to create Embarq.  They sold off their local division because they wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just bought a crapload more shares in Sprint at around $5.95

 

The stock is getting slaughtered. Thus, I would be shocked if a big buyer such as Softbank or institutional investor does not swoop in and take a big stake.

 

The stock market now values the total business of Sprint at almost the same amount as T-Mobile US:  ~$28 billion

 

Trading volume as of right now 80 million.  It is crazy this morning.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be a bad day for the M&A folks with this news as well as Fox throwing in the towel on bidding for Time Warner. Lots of fees down the drain!

I like the sound of lawyers weeping.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure about that? Well, in any meaningful way.

From the perspective of someone in a city where U-Verse is expanding: Absolutely. AT&T is going gangbusters here upgrading the entire U-Verse network. I expect them to be more competitive with Google Fiber (when it arrives) than Time Warner actually. Right now they are rolling out 300 Mbps with an upgrade to 1Gig down late this year/early next year.

 

I think Austin is pretty unique though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the perspective of someone in a city where U-Verse is expanding: Absolutely. AT&T is going gangbusters here upgrading the entire U-Verse network. I expect them to be more competitive with Google Fiber (when it arrives) than Time Warner actually. Right now they are rolling out 300 Mbps with an upgrade to 1Gig down late this year/early next year.

 

I think Austin is pretty unique though.

And AT&T would not be doing this if it wasn't for Google Fiber.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was being sarcastic with humor.

 

And wasn't anti sprint

 

I know :). In other news FCC chairman Wheeler had to have his two cents in: 

 

"Four national wireless providers is good for American consumers," Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler said in an emailed statement. "Sprint now has an opportunity to focus their efforts on robust competition."

 

This is highly unusual for an FCC chairman to comment on an unannounced merger. Good job chairman! The two smaller ones can drive each other into the ground with lower prices and not have enough money to bid on your auctions so that AT&T and Verizon can again dominate the spectrum wars. Yep, let them split the 20% of EBITDA that the Big Two don't already claim.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the caveat is AT&T doesn't want you having unlimited use on U-Verse with out paying a hefty fee. SO what good is a 1gb connection if you can't use it to it's fullest extent with out running into a AT&T cap?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...