Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

That's the thing this party needs to happen now not in a year by then Sprints image would be even worse. Every review of all networks I see sprint always comes in last. This shows how little band 41 has been deployed if they are having such a hard time getting speeds over 10mbps on every review site. They don't know how to see what band they are on they just follow sprints coverage maps which we know are beyond generous. Son knows what time it is now that the T-Mobile distraction is over its time to take the gloves off and put up or shut up. They have to stop talking about the network of the future and start making the network for now. It is called the NOW network after all. Band 26 is great and all but still too limited on capacity. Band 41 is there the only hope for a comback but it needs to be at least 1/3 complete by the end of this year.

I can't fault the author - it's not like VZW said "Test it in an XLTE market!" or T-Mobile said "Make sure you test in an urban core!" - the results are likely what people are experiencing in markets that haven't been fully upgraded or only have band 25.

 

Come back to this in a year from now when Sprint's network is tuned and optimized and you'll see a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are plenty of companies out there that could have provided backhaul more timely than the people Sprint chose.

 

This is very true.  Sprint picked poor performing companies in many instances.  They also waited late to execute many critical backhaul agreements.  And they also allowed too many poor performing companies to exceed the contract schedules without penalty or cancellation.  The backhaul deployment scheme could have been handled way better.

 

And Sprint is doing much better managing their backhaul deployment in 2014.  But it was a long and painful process to get here.  And they ain't outta the woods yet.

 

Robert

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the thing this party needs to happen now not in a year by then Sprints image would be even worse. Every review of all networks I see sprint always comes in last. This shows how little band 41 has been deployed if they are having such a hard time getting speeds over 10mbps on every review site. They don't know how to see what band they are on they just follow sprints coverage maps which we know are beyond generous. Son knows what time it is now that the T-Mobile distraction is over its time to take the gloves off and put up or shut up. They have to stop talking about the network of the future and start making the network for now. It is called the NOW network after all. Band 26 is great and all but still too limited on capacity. Band 41 is there the only hope for a comback but it needs to be at least 1/3 complete by the end of this year.

I don't want to make excuses for Sprint, but honestly, in a year from now, things will be dramatically better, to the point where Sprint can compete on price, coverage, and speed. Right now, they can only really compete on one of those things, and they're playing against a nihilist in Legere/TMO who can take the lumps to get subscribers.

 

I want the new leadership to jam their foot to the floor and crank out the next generation of NV... Perception will change, but not overnight.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They truly have an uphill battle when an article pops up like this:

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/4g-lte-showdown-how-fast-is-your-carrier/

 

They tested in ONE LOCATION (and likely not on Spark B41 either)

 

And the speed of downloading websites isn't that different.

 

One thing that was interesting in that article is it shows that most customers wouldn't notice the difference.  The Sprint LG G3 took 1 or 2 seconds longer at tasks.  It goes to show you that "Ludicrous Speed" is not necessary on a smartphone.  And only the e-penis people who keep doing speedtests are really going to notice the difference between 3Mbps with <100ms ping and 30Mbps.

 

Robert

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to make excuses for Sprint, but honestly, in a year from now, things will be dramatically better, to the point where Sprint can compete on price, coverage, and speed. Right now, they can only really compete on one of those things, and they're playing against a nihilist in Legere/TMO who can take the lumps to get subscribers.

 

I want the new leadership to jam their foot to the floor and crank out the next generation of NV... Perception will change, but not overnight.

I'm just sad to see them about to lose there #3 spot. By next year they will be #4 unless they act fast.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just sad to see them about to lose there #3 spot. By next year they will be #4 unless they act fast.

 

:rolleyes:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that was interesting in that article is it shows that most customers wouldn't notice the difference.  The Sprint LG G3 took 1 or 2 seconds longer at tasks.  It goes to show you that "Ludicrous Speed" is not necessary on a smartphone.  And only the e-penis people who keep doing speedtests are really going to notice the difference between 3Mbps with <100ms ping and 30Mbps.

 

Robert

 

 

agreed 1000% if it streams music with no issues and can watch a youtube clip I’m in!  (rather back lol) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just sad to see them about to lose there #3 spot. By next year they will be #4 unless they act fast.

If they lose their spot that will motivate them even more. They won't be far from Tmobile so they can easily take catch up and take the lead. I just hope we're all not having the conversation now in 6 months to 1 year.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope not either.

If they lose their spot that will motivate them even more. They won't be far from Tmobile so they can easily take catch up and take the lead. I just hope we're all not having the conversation now in 6 months to 1 year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK as  further stating I have a cable connection with 10-30ms/12mbpaping. I also am testing how it compares to a fringe band 26  connection with pings 60-80ms and 2-4mbps. Youtube videos load fine, webpages load fine, videos on other sites are fine. So How can this(band 26 connection) be fine for multiple devices running, yet when people go to their phones anything short of 30mbps is "insufficient" ? Bottom line comes down to people are just trying to make themselves feel better through a speed test "contest" that ensued with the 4g rollout of all carriers. or People are abusing the internet with massive torrents for their home use. And yet again constantly mashing speed test can and have killed wireless networks in some areas

 

Edit: As a side note I was even able to play Elder scrolls online with this same connection as a small test. very little difference from my cable connection.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to wireless carriers rankings that's about to change. If reports are leaning towards Sprint no longer holding the #3 spot that won't be a long term placement. Sprint has everything in needs to be successful (Resources) and extend the gap between tmobile but what was sorely missing is it's LEADERSHIP to take them there. Softbank Masayoshi son was the first and crucial step in that direction. Now with Mr. Hesse leaving Mr Son has chosen his successor and that's the 2nd most crucial step in Sprint's company to propel them back on course. Now what's next is staff management in key position which has already in the works and it's on. Both Mr. Son and Mr. Claure having a proven successful business track record and leadership to get this accomplish. Now with the circus show out of the way (tmobile) it can dedicate it's plan of action 100% to that.

 

The next phase is seeing what plans Sprint has in store and initiate it. I'm looking at both short term now, within a year, and long term, 3-5 years. Starting with the year plan to make a difference now rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ergen had some very nice words about Dan Hesse on that call. What is the outgoing Sprint CEO's future plans?

Good, I think Sprint needs to get in bed with Charlie. Marcelo needs to take one for the team ;). We need to keep Dish's spectrum out of T-Mobile's hands. Dish needs EBS spectrum for their plans. Sprint needs some more midband spectrum. I see common interests there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Story about Claure and Son meeting 2 years ago and falling in love:  http://online.wsj.com/articles/sprints-new-boss-will-stand-out-1407368271

P1-BQ945_MARCEL_DV_20140806175859.jpg      P1-BQ944_MARCEL_D_20140806181517.jpg

 

 

I don't see the article just an ad to subscribe to. Is there somewhere else I can view the story without subscribing to anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the article just an ad to subscribe to. Is there somewhere else I can view the story without subscribing to anything.

Do a Google search for this and select the article - you can read the full article.

 

Sprint Goes Off Beaten Track for New CEO Marcelo Claure

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do a Google search for this and select the article - you can read the full article.

 

Sprint Goes Off Beaten Track for New CEO Marcelo Claure

 

 

Great thanks that worked.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy Johnny's be a giant tool on Twitter customer acquisition strategy is in full effect right now.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/business/technology/article1160967.html

I have a feeling:

 

- Son has given Marcelo a very very long proverbial leash.

 

- Marcelo can take care of himself ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/dishs-ergen-collapse-sprintt-mobile-talks-increases-our-wireless-options/2014-08-06#comment-1531054172

 

Ah, death threats. Funny I didn't realize that the person here had already got banned and came back under a different ID. Otherwise I would have never replied.

 

I have notified Phil and I have screen shots to boot. I'm not scared.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy Johnny's be a giant tool on Twitter customer acquisition strategy is in full effect right now.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/business/technology/article1160967.html

 

 

HE'S A FOUL MOUTH JERK!!!!

 

That didn't take long but hardly unexpected. Amongst other issues the boy has he's really upset he didn't get the job.

 

* Very immature. A man playing boys games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no opinions on Hesse but Im very glad this merger is over.

 

Honestly, I dont know how they thought they could get past the feds.

 

Its obvious to everyone that the tmobile gimmicks have done more to improve the wireless industry than anything else in the past 5 years. I dont care if you think its an unsustainable business practice, you hate their CEO, or you dislike the color; for the consumer, it's been golden. Lower prices, new options and (gasp) competition rather than collusion.

 

A merger would have killed that.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...