Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

A Magnetbox might prove to be entertaining in a number of ways, if truth in advertising was involved.

 

A cathode ray tube is, by definition, a "magnet box."

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but I was thinking somewhere in the middle ground between that and this:

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint must be getting ready to kill the Spark name entirely. My note 5 doesn't have a Spark splash screen anymore, its not on Sprints website as far as device features anymore either. The only way to find it is on the coverage map. I think they are just going to call it enhanced LTE like Virgin and boost soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint must be getting ready to kill the Spark name entirely. My note 5 doesn't have a Spark splash screen anymore, its not on Sprints website as far as device features anymore either. The only way to find it is on the coverage map. I think they are just going to call it enhanced LTE like Virgin and boost soon.

This has been underway for a while.

 

http://www.s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5604-East/West-KY-and-Nashville-Premier-Maps-and-Discussion&do=findComment&comment=451260

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint must be getting ready to kill the Spark name entirely. My note 5 doesn't have a Spark splash screen anymore, its not on Sprints website as far as device features anymore either. The only way to find it is on the coverage map. I think they are just going to call it enhanced LTE like Virgin and boost soon.

Just noticed now, interesting.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad. Spark was confusing and a stupid idea from the get go. Make sure its a fast and painful death.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Am I the only one who liked the spinning spark logo and the boot intro and even the spark icon down to the name.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who liked the spinning spark logo and the boot intro and even the spark icon down to the name.

 

You're not the only one. I too liked "Spark", but its application was confusing. Perhaps it is better used as a name for a carrier.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who liked the spinning spark logo and the boot intro and even the spark icon down to the name.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I actually love the spinning spark logo because you see much better if data is being transferred or not.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually love the spinning spark logo because you see much better if data is being transferred or not.

Looks hella dope when you're pulling down 70Mbps with that Spinning Sun logo ;)

 

AT&T's Animation is wack, Verizon is Wack, T-Mobile has none and Sprin'ts looks awesome

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks hella dope when you're pulling down 70Mbps with that Spinning Sun logo ;)

 

AT&T's Animation is wack, Verizon is Wack, T-Mobile has none and Sprin'ts looks awesome

 

Kinda have to agree... and I absolute hate Verizon's it's always grainy looking and just bleh.

 

The sun just has that "cool" vibe to it. You know like the surfer dude who throws you the hang loose sign at you and says "bruh!" No? Maybe that's just me...  :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Austin, Houston, and San Antonio were some of the markets that was part of the 77 announced markets with both CA and Beamforming, but is that even possible on Clearwire equipment? Because those markets are filled with it. 8t8r radio here and there, but mostly old Clearwire equipment in most areas of the cities.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beamforming should be experienced at Sprint B41 8T8R sites where 4 tx antennas are visible to your device.  AFAIK, it will not be available on Clearwire B41 sites, and not at Sprint B41 sites still operating 2x mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we have a list of devices that support LTE+?

 

I just chatted with a Sprint rep and she said the list was not available yet, despite the fact that the news release says Sprint has 13 devices that support LTE+ currently available.

Basically any device that supports CA on B41. So, think any device since the Galaxy S6/HTC M9.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we have a list of devices that support LTE+?

 

I just chatted with a Sprint rep and she said the list was not available yet, despite the fact that the news release says Sprint has 13 devices that support LTE+ currently available.

Note Edge

LG GFlex 2

LG G4

Galaxy s6

S6 edge

HTC one m9

Note 5

S6 edge plus

iPhone 6s

iPhone 6s Plus

Nexus 5x (2015 version)

Nexus 6 (2015 version)

HTC one a9

 

I think that's it.... Not including hotspot devices

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note Edge

LG GFlex 2

LG G4

Galaxy s6

S6 edge

HTC one m9

Note 5

S6 edge plus

iPhone 6s

iPhone 6s Plus

Nexus 5x (2015 version)

Nexus 6 (2015 version)

HTC one a9

 

I think that's it.... Not including hotspot devices

Isn't it the Nexus 6P?

 

Sent from my Note 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...