Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

It's a local joke about California falling into the ocean, making AZ oceanfront property. Or so I'm assuming being from the area and knowing this joke.

 

It is more a joke about a person being naive or gullible enough to believe that there is oceanfront property in Arizona.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not using my upgrade until 2034. That is when the super spark part 4 is completed, 1 Tbps should be available by then.

 

I'm going to use the upgrade to buy an iPhone 21 with 1024G Quads of flash memory with cloaking technology and sell it on Swappa.

 

Jokes on you!, Android will have the teleportation app by then! Apple will need the Google teleport app so people don't get teleported off a cliff or in the middle of a lake  :rofl:

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is more a joke about a person being naive or gullible enough to believe that there is oceanfront property in Arizona.

 

AJ

I like AJ's reasoning better. If California was to separate though, with a GDP of almost $2 trillion, it would manage just fine. That would be the 9th highest GDP in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like AJ's reasoning better. If California was to separate though, with a GDP of almost $2 trillion, it would manage just fine. That would be the 9th highest GDP in the world.

 

I don't know, I saw a documentary that contained a guy in a cape flying around. Not much of CA left if that doc story turned out as planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Nokia is building our new Sprint Spark backbone.

 

Rest assured that through any natural disaster and/or armageddon we will always have TD-LTE at our side.

 

PS

 

I wonder, what with the 4G LTE revolution we are living in, when will we make the transition from backhaul to fronthaul... or the cheaper alternative... U-haul

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Nokia is building our new Sprint Spark backbone. Rest assured that through any natural disaster and/or armageddon we will always have TD-LTE at our side. PS I wonder, what with the 4G LTE revolution we are living in, when will we make the transition from backhaul to fronthaul... or the cheaper alternative... U-haul Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

Samsung, Nokia, and Alcatel-Lucent actually. NSN will  probably take over Ericsson land. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung, Nokia, and Alcatel-Lucent actually. NSN will probably take over Ericsson land.

I stand corrected. Reading that article that was linked a few pages back made it seem NSN was doing all the heavy lifting for Spark.

 

Then again it was on their own page, which explains that.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since that would be Band 41 to Band 25/26, it wouldn't be any different that switching from 3G to 4G, there's a break in the data but that's it.

 

What do you mean a break in the data, as in lost data packets?

 

I thought that was not the case, no data lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean a break in the data, as in lost data packets?

 

I thought that was not the case, no data lost.

 

Think about handing off from 3G to 4G. You don't have data for a moment. Any data session is paused. I would assume it would be the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone in one of the five markets where the new spark network has been somewhat launched has any updates as to whether the one of the new tri-band phones has picked up the network? I know that the both LG's are not getting the spark update until early 2014, but the Galaxy Mega, & the mini S4 are supposedly go to go out of the box for the spark connection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently not many people want the mega or s4 mini, likely because they are mid range devices. As far as I know, nobody has reported band 41 working on any triband phone yet.

I would but tampa which is the closest announced market to me about 90 miles away and I don't want to waste that kind of gas just to see a tower for 5 mins 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...