Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

I'm surprised to see them admit that.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

I'm wondering many things.   One is, that I use to have pretty decent band 41 coverage and if not, 1900 was good.   Now, in the last 6 months, no band 41 (you have to be right near the tower it seems now) and 1900 isn't anything too great anymore.    What happened?   Is Sprint turning down the signal strength?   The service, what was once pretty good, is just lack luster now.    Are they purposely chasing away customers to say: Hey look... we're bleeding and can't stop...      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering many things.   One is, that I use to have pretty decent band 41 coverage and if not, 1900 was good.   Now, in the last 6 months, no band 41 (you have to be right near the tower it seems now) and 1900 isn't anything too great anymore.    What happened?   Is Sprint turning down the signal strength?   The service, what was once pretty good, is just lack luster now.    Are they purposely chasing away customers to say: Hey look... we're bleeding and can't stop...      
That might be the cause or they are tweaking the network. I'm not too sure what to make of it though.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed a decrease in service as well, would be terrible if that's really what they're doing.
By what you guys are all saying it definitely sounds like it is what they're doing.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BlueAngel said:

I've noticed a decrease in service as well, would be terrible if that's really what they're doing.

I had the same experience for like a month or so. I think it was my phone and not the network. Sprint is starting to perform very well in my market. It just sucks that they are improving so much only months out from merging with T-Mobile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the same experience for like a month or so. I think it was my phone and not the network. Sprint is starting to perform very well in my market. It just sucks that they are improving so much only months out from merging with T-Mobile. 
To me it's all a publicity stunt.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Both T-Mobile and Sprint are both acting. 
I call it a bunch of BS until otherwise proven. Sprint's network here has improved on the speed side drastically. But the coverage still stinks it's like swiss cheese only a mile from the highway and even T-Mobile has gotten pretty bad at my parents place.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dro1984 said:

I'm wondering many things.   One is, that I use to have pretty decent band 41 coverage and if not, 1900 was good.   Now, in the last 6 months, no band 41 (you have to be right near the tower it seems now) and 1900 isn't anything too great anymore.    What happened?   Is Sprint turning down the signal strength?   The service, what was once pretty good, is just lack luster now.    Are they purposely chasing away customers to say: Hey look... we're bleeding and can't stop...      

 

34 minutes ago, BlueAngel said:

I've noticed a decrease in service as well, would be terrible if that's really what they're doing.

No. That's not what is happening. Whatever is affecting your service, Sprint is not purposely degrading your experience. I have noticed nothing but improvements in the parts of the network I use. To degrade service on purpose would open them up to so many issues, it wouldn't be worth it just to try and sell the merger. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. That's not what is happening. Whatever is affecting your service, Sprint is not purposely degrading your experience. I have noticed nothing but improvements in the parts of the network I use. To degrade service on purpose would open them up to so many issues, it wouldn't be worth it just to try and sell the merger. 
So it's actually improving their Network?

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

So it's actually improving their Network?

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

It’s reoptimization. Doing so across an entire market can take a few weeks but RF performance should significantly increase afterwards (namely in the form of better average SNR/RSRQ). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s reoptimization. Doing so across an entire market can take a few weeks but RF performance should significantly increase afterwards (namely in the form of better average SNR/RSRQ). 
I'll be looking forward to increase performance it would be fantastic to see that.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dro1984 said:

I'm wondering many things.   One is, that I use to have pretty decent band 41 coverage and if not, 1900 was good.   Now, in the last 6 months, no band 41 (you have to be right near the tower it seems now) and 1900 isn't anything too great anymore.    What happened?   Is Sprint turning down the signal strength?   The service, what was once pretty good, is just lack luster now.    Are they purposely chasing away customers to say: Hey look... we're bleeding and can't stop...      

6 months ago would have been winter and no leaves on the trees. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure coverage weakens with dense foliage. Not saying this is your issue, but it could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint isn't intentionally making service worse. My service has improved here in Boston significantly. I'm coming across more and more small cells as well as carrier aggregation and 64QAM uploads on Band 25.

That said, everything that's being said by either company is being said for the express purpose of selling the merger to the FCC so that they'll allow them to do it. They will say whatever it takes for the FCC to throw them a pity party and give them the green light to merge.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed a decrease in service as well, would be terrible if that's really what they're doing.
I also get a lot of drops to 3G now, when previously in the same areas I had solid band 25 or band 41. In my case, I think it's a combination of Android Pie having a crappy modem and the software update for 64 QAM upload in Samsung markets. Network Signal Guru shows lots of failed handoff attempts and failed "attachment".

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had several IoT units that simply would not function on band 41 in our area, or 2 and 3x CA would break the unit connection so that it would be in radio search or go to low power mode in MI, OH, and SC. I stuck what I could on band 25 and migrated the rest to other carriers. This was in areas with good, full builds.

The network is in worse shape in many areas it was not less then a year ago; our area is notorious for investment neglect but this is wide and over a large timeframe.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ingenium said:

I also get a lot of drops to 3G now, when previously in the same areas I had solid band 25 or band 41. In my case, I think it's a combination of Android Pie having a crappy modem and the software update for 64 QAM upload in Samsung markets. Network Signal Guru shows lots of failed handoff attempts and failed "attachment".

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

My performance on Android P. on my Essential phone has been a lot crappier too. I thought it was just in my head but maybe that's it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My performance on Android P. on my Essential phone has been a lot crappier too. I thought it was just in my head but maybe that's it. 
In my opinion the essential phone overall is worse. I had it for like 2 weeks and I was not pleased with the overall reception of the phone.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, danlodish345 said:

In my opinion the essential phone overall is worse. I had it for like 2 weeks and I was not pleased with the overall reception of the phone.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

That's true without a doubt, it sucks in terms of RF performance compared to be LG V20, but Android P seemed to make it even worse - it doesn't aggregate carriers like it did before. I might actually downgrade to see. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true without a doubt, it sucks in terms of RF performance compared to be LG V20, but Android P seemed to make it even worse - it doesn't aggregate carriers like it did before. I might actually downgrade to see. 
I even tested it on T-Mobile and it didn't work right. And the unit turned off on me one night and stopped working so I returned it and I've been happy now with the newer phone.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So currently, some old sprint customers are excluded to data prioritization as long as they don't upgrade.  Do you think it'd be safe to assume these customers will fall under t-mobile's data prioritization policy after the merger? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrjeff said:

So currently, some old sprint customers are excluded to data prioritization as long as they don't upgrade.  Do you think it'd be safe to assume these customers will fall under t-mobile's data prioritization policy after the merger? 

These folks may no longer be in contract as two years have likely passed since their last phone purchase. We only have a very few cases of where people have been noticeably throttled on Sprint, so they likely already fall under this policy. I would separate the data prioritization policy from the billing in this situation as one falls under network and the other marketing (who does not want churn and should be making money when they are collecting for an unutilized subsidized phone unless there is a heavy utilization of their higher roaming allowances).  An alternative view is the contract carries on month to month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...