Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

That’ll be some ish if they did pass them up. According to that doc that was posted a few posts ago, Sprints average was 23.8. Wow the wonders of investing in the network lol. They’ve had a huge speed spike in such a short time. Whats crazy is still have PLENTY room to grow their speeds. However, I feel like T-Mobile is starting to hit their ceiling on average speeds. 
My personal best with Sprint.10e8d078e73980db01a78f52016aba19.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Trip said:

Isn't the point of the upcoming millimeter wave auction to provide large, ultra-wide bandwidth spectrum that will likely only be of much value in urban areas, thus providing the capacity necessary?  And isn't most of the Band 41 spectrum unlicensed in rural areas because EBS spectrum never got assigned?

- Trip

Then they would offer it in places they have 2.5 spectrum. Then there is the CBRS and LAA schemes. Then the upcoming 3.7-4.2 band (C-Band).

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Trip said:

I don't know how to read this.  Why only 50%?  Are they going to offer service in Manhattan where they're dense but not in the rural areas, where the service is actually needed, because they're not dense?  Or does it mean something else entirely?

- Trip

I don't know how to read that either but from what I've read of their FCC documents, it seems like their wireless broadband is going to target folks without access to high speed broadband and low income areas, at least initially. It's mentioned in the latest document that they made for the FCC that by 2024, they'll offer download speeds of 25Mbps or greater to 52.2 Million POPs over 2.4 Million square miles to homes in rural America which corresponds to 84% or rural POPs. They also state that they believe 20-25% of new adds in 2024 will be from in-home broadband subscribers in rural areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how to read that either but from what I've read of their FCC documents, it seems like their wireless broadband is going to target folks without access to high speed broadband and low income areas, at least initially. It's mentioned in the latest document that they made for the FCC that by 2024, they'll offer download speeds of 25Mbps or greater to 52.2 Million POPs over 2.4 Million square miles to homes in rural America which corresponds to 84% or rural POPs. They also state that they believe 20-25% of new adds in 2024 will be from in-home broadband subscribers in rural areas.
The combined Sprint and T-will “have sufficient capacity to offer an in-home product at a lower price than current offerings in over half of U.S. zip codes, bringing broadband choice to many consumers for the first time.”
This is how it's supposed to be read

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tyroned3222 said:

The combined Sprint and T-will “have sufficient capacity to offer an in-home product at a lower price than current offerings in over half of U.S. zip codes, bringing broadband choice to many consumers for the first time.”
This is how it's supposed to be read

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Ok that's more understandable to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the merger happens, I wonder what will happen to Sprint's roaming agreements.  Several places I go I get LTE roaming or even 1x/CDMA from VZW.  If those agreements go away I will end up with No Service as it currently stands.  :( 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the merger happens, I wonder what will happen to Sprint's roaming agreements.  Several places I go I get LTE roaming or even 1x/CDMA from VZW.  If those agreements go away I will end up with No Service as it currently stands.  [emoji20] 
 
That's a great question....however, a year from now 1x/CDMA will no longer exist on Verizon as they will be the first pure LTE network after they shut down 3G. Should make their current roaming agreements very interesting.

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, brockeb1 said:

That's a great question....however, a year from now 1x/CDMA will no longer exist on Verizon as they will be the first pure LTE network after they shut down 3G. Should make their current roaming agreements very interesting.

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 

Verizon still has 1x active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

Verizon still has 1x active.

Still a whole bunch of odd stuff out there using CDMA.  Security systems,  data gathering equipment at remote locations without a conventional phone.  All this odd stuff would need to be upgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon still has 1x active.
That is correct. Disappearing about a year from now. Expect it sooner in most cases/places as they need the spectrum for LTE.
https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/verizon-stops-activating-cdma-3g-devices-as-network-shutdown-looms

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is correct. Disappearing about a year from now. Expect it sooner in most cases/places as they need the spectrum for LTE.
https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/verizon-stops-activating-cdma-3g-devices-as-network-shutdown-looms

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

Places that are seeing band 5 ... I guess we should expect those markets to have CDMA shut off already I'm guessing of course

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Verizon has a lot of 1x M2M customers. Until those are gone there will be some 1x. Probably not enough for Sprint to roam on.

That's what I'm thinking. They may just leave a sliver of 1x left for legacy purposes but get rid of the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

Would they disable cdma 1x voice and just leave data?

No real reason to get rid of voice for a few years.  They could just leave a sliver of 1x CDMA in a 1900mhz guard band and the part that already exists in 800mhz.  That would satisfy any legacy M2M customers.  They may even pick up the CDMA M2M customers that are currently on Verizon when they shut theirs down if their devices are capable of using the Sprint band classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No real reason to get rid of voice for a few years.  They could just leave a sliver of 1x CDMA in a 1900mhz guard band and the part that already exists in 800mhz.  That would satisfy any legacy M2M customers.  They may even pick up the CDMA M2M customers that are currently on Verizon when they shut theirs down if their devices are capable of using the Sprint band classes.
If I'm not mistaken most of them are capable of using the Bands Sprint uses?

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

If I'm not mistaken most of them are capable of using the Bands Sprint uses?

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

They may have BC1 support but I doubt many of them would have BC10 support. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, danlodish345 said:

So then I agree with you. They would have to do a lot of upgrading.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

With the incentives offered to upgrade from 2g/3g to lte modules by Verizon, I can't imagine anyone would upgrade to hardware that supports BC10 and not LTE - it such modules exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's very true as well. It all needs to be future-proof. So why not insensitize them

With the incentives offered to upgrade from 2g/3g to lte modules by Verizon, I can't imagine anyone would upgrade to hardware that supports BC10 and not LTE - it such modules exist. 


Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

Verizon has a lot of 1x M2M customers. Until those are gone there will be some 1x. Probably not enough for Sprint to roam on.

According to Verizon Enterprise, they will no longer support non-LTE devices after 12/31/19, period. AT&T shut down GSM over a year ago, there's no reason Verizon won't do the same with CDMA. 

Screenshot_20180905-185138.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Verizon Enterprise, they will no longer support non-LTE devices after 12/31/19, period. AT&T shut down GSM over a year ago, there's no reason Verizon won't do the same with CDMA. 
Screenshot_20180905-185138.thumb.png.8795073d5fb1104990549dbc286afa0d.png
The only question I figure is what is going to happen to Sprint customers when Verizon shuts down CDMA altogether. I think they may try to Kabul some type of Lte roaming agreement but I don't know.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only question I figure is what is going to happen to Sprint customers when Verizon shuts down CDMA altogether. I think they may try to Kabul some type of Lte roaming agreement but I don't know.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

By that time all of sprints roaming will be handle by tmo.. hoping by that time tmo would have services in these areas

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...