Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Has anyone seen the Sprint narwhal commercial? I just saw it but can't find it online anywhere. I wasn't a big fan of that one, but here is hoping it works.

Its been on several times on fox and FS1 with the Sprint Unlimited coverage. Its still better than the old commercials.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7Jn4/sprint-unlimited-plan-narwhals

Who ever hasn't seen this on TV yet.

guess we'll see if this works. I don't personally like it though and will fast forward through it. What I don't get is that when you see a t-mobile or Verizon ad, it is classy and to the point. I used to even rewind the t-mobile commercials because I liked then. So far I am embarrassed to be a Sprint costumer with these ads. I am not supposed to be on a budget carrier and don't want my ads to come across like it. You don't have to scream or be stupid to get your point across. Trust customers like they have a brain and not like Twitter and they will still get the message.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess we'll see if this works. I don't personally like it though and will fast forward through it. What I don't get is that when you see a t-mobile or Verizon ad, it is classy and to the point. I used to even rewind the t-mobile commercials because I liked then. So far I am embarrassed to be a Sprint costumer with these ads. I am not supposed to be on a budget carrier and don't want my ads to come across like it. You don't have to scream or be stupid to get your point across. Trust customers like they have a brain and not like Twitter and they will still get the message.

I agree, I wish they didn't feel like a nick toons commercial for the next toy.

 

I think Verizon has the right idea on advertising.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by CrimsonKnightDX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has to get your attention somehow. For a while, most people wouldn't pay attention to Sprint's commercials or name, even if it were the most high class/high production ad in the country. Seeing as though Sprint is recovery mode now, they have to pull silly commercials like this in order to get their name stuck in your head. Now, every time you hear that song, or it even pops up in your head, you'll remember that you heard it in a Sprint ad. That's how it's supposed to work.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has to get your attention somehow. For a while, most people wouldn't pay attention to Sprint's commercials or name, even if it were the most high class/high production ad in the country. Seeing as though Sprint is recovery mode now, they have to pull silly commercials like this in order to get their name stuck in your head. Now, every time you hear that song, or it even pops up in your head, you'll remember that you heard it in a Sprint ad. That's how it's supposed to work.

True, I see what you're saying and you're right. At the same time, they have been doing silly ads for quite sometime now, including the Framily commercials. I really think if they switched it to the style that Verizon is doing or even tmo... It might have the same positive effect without being so silly to gain attention.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess we'll see if this works. I don't personally like it though and will fast forward through it. What I don't get is that when you see a t-mobile or Verizon ad, it is classy and to the point. I used to even rewind the t-mobile commercials because I liked then. So far I am embarrassed to be a Sprint costumer with these ads. I am not supposed to be on a budget carrier and don't want my ads to come across like it. You don't have to scream or be stupid to get your point across. Trust customers like they have a brain and not like Twitter and they will still get the message.

While it isn't a commercial I would have chosen, it is shit-tons better than the current AT&T commercials. The "I appreciate you" AT&T commercial is nauseatingly annoying as are the rest of their current commercials.

 

I think Sprint is on the right track.

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint seriously needs to market themselves based completed markets... That commercial is one for various markets I will agree, but sprint should have serious take the gloves off and punch Verizon/at/Tmo in markets where they are up to par... A serious commercial that says " we are so sure about our network we are willing to cut your bill half just to prove it".

 

Leave the narwhals, chair saws and stuff In other markets..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess we'll see if this works. I don't personally like it though and will fast forward through it. What I don't get is that when you see a t-mobile or Verizon ad, it is classy and to the point. I used to even rewind the t-mobile commercials because I liked then. So far I am embarrassed to be a Sprint costumer with these ads. I am not supposed to be on a budget carrier and don't want my ads to come across like it. You don't have to scream or be stupid to get your point across. Trust customers like they have a brain and not like Twitter and they will still get the message.

Classy? Did you see the Kim Kardashian ad from T-Mobile?
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great. now I can't get that song out of my head.

 

I thought you more of a Kylie Minogue guy...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFx3WX4DES0

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sprint is the official carrier of the NBA or am I just late? I'm more a college bball guy myself.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sprint is the official carrier of the NBA or am I just late? I'm more a college bball guy myself.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, they have been for some time now. Wish they would do the NFL again at one point or MLB.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they have been for some time now. Wish they would do the NFL again at one point or MLB.

It would be kick ass if they did either, but with Verizon being very dominant in the NFL it would be IMO tough to get them to switch. But hey, money talks!

 

I'd honestly rather see them go after MLB. Again, just my opinion but I would think there is a bigger market in MLB. But I could be wrong.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to believe overall score in Atlanta, GA @ #4.  http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/atlanta-ga

 

Sprint only weakness is the Speed Index.  Does it hurt Sprint that bad?  I thought Atlanta is a rock solid network for Sprint too.

 

Came out 1st on Reliability Index, Call Performance and Text Performance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems the network vision is starting to pay off in big cities . San Antonio joins Chicago as a Sprint strong market http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/san-antonio-tx/2015/1H

Surprised the downlink decreased from their last report...and same with ATT and tmobiles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...