Jump to content

Is HD Voice now on? Mine appears to be working


Recommended Posts

Just completed an EVRC-NW call in PCS on my Nexus 5 here in Austin. The other end of the connection was a landline, and I could definitely tell the quality difference from the get-go, mainly from the background noise while the call was ringing. Of course, the actual voice part of the call was nice and clear too, through my headset.

 

Not completely sure when this enhancement happened, partially because I don't call non-cell phones much and as such the receiving end of the call is generally the limiting factor, but I like the quality increase. Need to find someone with an HD voice enabled Sprint phone to test that part of the conversation against.

 

Do you happen to know what kind of landline was on the other end?

 

I only ask since now with the prevalence of the Phone Connect devices, calling a "landline" doesn't necessarily mean it's not another wireless customer. That "landline" could easily be a Sprint Phone Connect (which may support EVRC-NW).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you happen to know what kind of landline was on the other end?

 

I only ask since now with the prevalence of the Phone Connect devices, calling a "landline" doesn't necessarily mean it's not another wireless customer. That "landline" could easily be a Sprint Phone Connect (which may support EVRC-NW).

 

This is an actual, Verizon wireline analog POTS line, served over 20,610 feet of toll-grade copper, with the last few feet of the connection being over the US flavor of DECT. No EVRC-NW on that side of the conneciton :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an actual, Verizon wireline analog POTS line, served over 20,610 feet of toll-grade copper, with the last few feet of the connection being over the US flavor of DECT. No EVRC-NW on that side of the conneciton :)

 

Well, that was a much better explanation than I thought I would get.

 

I wonder if perhaps the new technology required on the network for the HD Voice functionality is better at determining the best quality connection and codec mixing even if it isn't "HD Voice" the entire way end to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just called two friends that were in town this weekend one on Sprint and the other on Virgin mobile. Both calls sounded much clearer than before. Neat.

I checked tonight and I have the EVRC_NW SO on my G2 in the West KY market now. Seems like its enabled here as well. East/West Ky are served from the same MSC so its likely enabled across both markets. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connected to 800 here in maine and figured I would check and see if i had HD Voice on my Nexus 5.  Called the sprint voice mail system and it showed EVRC-NW.  Cool.

 

I then tried a call between the house phone which is a VOIP line and the Nexus 5 and it still shows EVRC-NW.

 

Then tried a call with the credit unions automated system and it showed the same thing.

 

I am not sure what to think now.

 

I dont know anyone else with Sprint service up here so i cant test that way. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had an HD voice call today. It was interesting considering that I only have 4g upgrades done here. The person calling me lives here but was in Nashville, I guess that made a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connected to 800 here in maine and figured I would check and see if i had HD Voice on my Nexus 5.  Called the sprint voice mail system and it showed EVRC-NW.  Cool.

 

I then tried a call between the house phone which is a VOIP line and the Nexus 5 and it still shows EVRC-NW.

 

Then tried a call with the credit unions automated system and it showed the same thing.

 

I am not sure what to think now.

 

I dont know anyone else with Sprint service up here so i cant test that way. :P

 

My theory is that the phone will utilize EVRC-NW if it can on that tower to ensure the highest quality connection on your side, and any codec changes that need to occur are taken care of on the network side somewhere for transcoding to another system. I have no basis for this idea other than anecdotal evidence from users here that are getting higher-quality calls, even without a full HD Voice connection end-to-end Sprint-Sprint.

 

It seems the most logical to have the network do some transcoding and ensure the highest quality codecs along the connection route that Sprint can control so even if it isn't HD Voice, it is a higher quality connection than whatever compromise would happen with determining an identical codec between the two ends. That compromise could end up with a low quality or old codec pretty easily versus a transcoding system that doesn't rely on what either end has in common, but rather whatever either end is capable of on the high end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My theory is that the phone will utilize EVRC-NW if it can on that tower to ensure the highest quality connection on your side, and any codec changes that need to occur are taken care of on the network side somewhere for transcoding to another system. I have no basis for this idea other than anecdotal evidence from users here that are getting higher-quality calls, even without a full HD Voice connection end-to-end Sprint-Sprint.

 

It is possible but also, in that type of set up you can introduce a lot of latency / delay due to having to transcode several times during the call in both directions.  There is already slight delay with cell phones to begin with.  I have to wonder in your example set up, how much additional delay there is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SIAP

 

http://www.lightreading.com/mobile/4g-lte/sprints-hesse-hd-voice-goes-nationwide-in-july-/d/d-id/708372?_mc=sm_lr

 

 

Oracle Industry Connect — BOSTON — Sprint CEO Dan Hesse revealed in his keynote here Tuesday that the operator is ready to launch its HD Voice service across the US in July.

HD Voice increases the clarity of a voice call across 7 octaves, as opposed to the 4 octaves that many current smartphones support. Sprint seen some delays to the service, which it first expected to have available in 2013, it is so far only deployed in a few markets like Kansas City. (See Sprint Commits to Tri-Band, HD Voice PhonesSprint Bringing Spark to Kansas City, and Sprint Delays HD Voice Launch to Q2.)

"Voice is still the killer app," Hesse told the crowd.

"Some of you may have experienced [HD Voice], we've launched in a few markets," he said. "We'll launch the entire country around the first of July."

 

 

Deep Dish
018.jpg
Having spectrum band options allows Sprint to offer a 4G pizza, "with extra toppings," Hesse explains.

 

 

Hesse also took the time to try and explain Sprint's "Spark" 4G update plans. "I'm told this is a technical crowd," he said.

As the image above shows, Sprint is using its Clearwire-derived 2.5 GHz spectrum for LTE speed and capacity. The 1900 MHz 4G portion gets more coverage and capacity, while the 800 MHz LTE signals go a long way for better coverage. (See Stephen Bye: Sprint's Network Visionary and Igniting the Future: Sprint Spark.)

Hesse says that Sprint can also eek more range out of 2.5 GHZ LTE TDD spectrum with "8 transmitters and 8 receivers in one box" (8T8R) at the cellsite and MIMO (multiple antenna arrays) on the device.

Combining this with carrier aggregation -- bonding unrelated radio channels for a fatter pipe -- could give Sprint 120 MHZ of spectrum to play with in the second half of 2015, Hesse said.

"That's two big channels of 60 MHz," he adds. "We're talking 18 months away."

The company expects that this update could lead to device download speeds of 150 Mbit/s to 180 Mbit/s.

Hesse told them that this is what justified the company's buyout of long-time partner Clearwire, access to 90 MHz of 2.5 GHz spectrum across the US. "You need these super big highways and that's why we spent all the money for Clearwire," he said. John Saw, former CTO of Clearwire, and the man behind the company's LTE strategy, has just taken over as chief networks officer at Sprint. (See John Saw to Become Sprint Network Boss.)

— Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, Light Reading

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did some searching on the web and some people are reporting this as well. I was unaware the 5s was hd voice capable. Do you have a credible source?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

 

Posted at sprint.com now too.

http://support.sprint.com/support/article/FAQs_about_HD_Voice_from_Sprint/3b348589-81a4-452d-8758-cd47d7ddb952

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called my wife last night in north Fort Worth and it was obviously HD voice. Very clear call, to the point where we both commented on it. Also, our noise-canceling software on our phones (Nexus 5 and HTC One) was in full play, because I was driving with the windows open in my Mustang and she had screaming kids, and neither of us could hear all the background noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had my first HD Voice experience tonight.. wife called my N5 from her iPhone 5s, we both immediately noticed the incredible clarity. It was by far the clearest telephone call I have ever heard, landline or mobile. She put it on speakerphone while driving and it didn't sound any different.

 

Very impressed. The fact that she noticed means anyone will notice.. she pays virtually no attention to stuff like this!

 

FWIW, we were both physically in the Boston market (no, not the chicken place unfortunately).. I have a MA number and she has a MI number.

 

-Mike

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know if Sprint has plans to push firmware updates to older devices that would include support for the HD Voice Codecs?

Probably not. It takes more than just a codec for HD voice. There are some hardware requirements too. Like two microphones.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two Microphones? Interesting...My past experience with VOIP, enabling HD Voice was as simple as installing an HD Voice Codec. I believe all the phones we were using only had one mic.

 

Would you have a link for the hardware requirements? Wouldn't mind doing a little learning :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two Microphones? Interesting...My past experience with VOIP, enabling HD Voice was as simple as installing an HD Voice Codec. I believe all the phones we were using only had one mic.

 

Would you have a link for the hardware requirements? Wouldn't mind doing a little learning :)

Not sure this list it totally complete or accurate, but it is worth looking at.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Smartphones_using_HD_Voice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question has probably been answered before. But say I call someone who has an iPhone 5, and I have a 5s. Will I be able to hear them better than they can hear me because of HD voice? I'm not sure if it requires both devices to be HD voice capable. Sorry if that's a dumb question, even though there are no dumb questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question has probably been answered before. But say I call someone who has an iPhone 5, and I have a 5s. Will I be able to hear them better than they can hear me because of HD voice? I'm not sure if it requires both devices to be HD voice capable. Sorry if that's a dumb question, even though there are no dumb questions.

You both need to have it, or nothing. It will just sound regular until both phones are on the hd codec.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...