Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

 

 

Probably bleeding over the edge. I wouldn't count on a strong signal for some time, as you're outside of the NYC market, and the Long Island market isn't currently seeing LTE activated. Probably at least a few more weeks before that starts to happen.

 

I read some where that the NYC & Long Island counts as one Market & im going with that . I don't think bleed over bc the tower closest to me has been acting weird like its being tested on , so im probably gonna be able to access tester LTE sometime around this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would wish Sprint would start advertising this, safe network practice should come with every new Sprint cellphone. Some would argue that's what they are paying for, while true you don't want a slow network.

 

--

Chris

 

That's why they have the Sprint Connections Optimizer available preinstalled on Android phones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I read some where that the NYC & Long Island counts as one Market & im going with that . I don't think bleed over bc the tower closest to me has been acting weird like its being tested on , so im probably gonna be able to access tester LTE sometime around this month.

 

The fact of the matter though, is that they are two seperate markets. If you were a sponsor, you'd see that it's clearly defined that Long Island is not part of the New York market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I read some where that the NYC & Long Island counts as one Market & im going with that . I don't think bleed over bc the tower closest to me has been acting weird like its being tested on , so im probably gonna be able to access tester LTE sometime around this month.

 

Sprint has NYC and Long Island as two separate markets. Long Island is 6-9 months behind NYC deployment. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/gallery/image/156-nationwide-sprint-market-map-medium/

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Sprint has NYC and Long Island as two separate markets. Long Island is 6-9 months behind NYC deployment. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/gallery/image/156-nationwide-sprint-market-map-medium/

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Oh well , im directly near the end of Queens like im on the borderline , so my town Elmont will probably get LTE around the time Queens does hopefully. I don't understand why Sprint has NYC & Long Island marked as 2 different Markets I mean its still NY State, it should be one Market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh well , im directly near the end of Queens like im on the borderline , so my town Elmont will probably get LTE around the time Queens does hopefully. I don't understand why Sprint has NYC & Long Island marked as 2 different Markets I mean its still NY State, it should be one Market.

 

The State of New York is much too large for one market. NY has six markets, statewide. And NYC market is already the largest in the country, with the most sites.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The State of New York is much too large for one market. NY has six markets, statewide. And NYC market is already the largest in the country, with the most sites.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Just learned something today thank you for the lesson . Im still hoping for a summer release of LTE in my town idc bout the rest of L.I lol .

Edited by IsaiahL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed LTE in ridgewood there's also LTE in east Elmhurst where I picked it up . Someone should go map it

I mapped some on sensorly at Metropolitan ave while shopping at BJs. The speeds in the parking lot were around 10 down and 6 up.

 

I see someone has been mapping Rikers island :rofl: . Maybe the signal is making it all the way to east emhurst :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant wait for LTE my 3G has been disappointing as of today , & my phone keeps flip flopping from 3G to 2G & then the 2G is working better than 3G IDK if that makes sense but its what im getting weird huh ,

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant wait for LTE my 3G has been disappointing as of today , & my phone keeps flip flopping from 3G to 2G & then the 2G is working better than 3G IDK if that makes sense but its what im getting weird huh ,

 

I wouldn't call it wierd, that actually sums up the service I've been getting in my area for about a year now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the toughest part about getting NV going in our area is building permits and access. Once that is all in place, you need to get a crane there to get a crew up to install panels and radio heads.

 

So much goes into getting a site online, it's very complex.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the toughest part about getting NV going in our area is building permits and access. Once that is all in place, you need to get a crane there to get a crew up to install panels and radio heads.

 

So much goes into getting a site online, it's very complex.

 

I understand that but Sprint needs to hurry up d.a. there moving mad slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I would disagree with you on that, but its your opinion and we all have one. Keep in mind that your area can go from no LTE to LTE in matters of months.

 

--

Chris

 

Keyword MONTHS , I wish it was weeks lml , but I guess i'll just have to wait , I wonder if its gonna be like this when 5G comes out Lol jumping a couple years into the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keyword MONTHS , I wish it was weeks lml , but I guess i'll just have to wait , I wonder if its gonna be like this when 5G comes out Lol jumping a couple years into the future.

 

LOL I know man we all want it fast, but it will. Well whenever the next wireless technology comes it will be implemented much quicker and faster than LTE for Sprint. Sprint is redoing all there towers getting new back haul and new tech. Basically its a BRAND new network. So once the new tech is announce all Sprint has to do is upgrade their network rather then replace it all like what they are doing now.

 

--

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keyword MONTHS , I wish it was weeks lml , but I guess i'll just have to wait , I wonder if its gonna be like this when 5G comes out Lol jumping a couple years into the future.

 

Have you read the article on the wall that Robert posted not long ago? Really helps to highlight how many moving parts there are with this project, and how hard it is to get everything to line up.

 

Verizon and AT&T both spent MONTHS rolling out their 4G networks in each locality. The difference is, you didn't know they were working on it. Then one day out of the blue, Verizon/AT&T say, oh by the way, 4G LTE is in your area now! And suddenly people can connect.

 

Sprint is allowing connections as each tower is completed, instead of waiting until the whole region is complete to turn it on. This gives the impression that Sprint is moving very slow because one week, LTE shows up on these few blocks, next week LTE shows up a few blocks away, but it's not everywhere. Reality is, Sprint is rebuilding the entire network in just over two years, which is incredibly fast for the amount of work that entails.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling a lot more towers are completed but not turned on until the market is launched. So the few that are made available are probably just to tease us. lol

 

Unless they are doing something different in New York, once a tower is completed, it is turned on and made public. Coverage the day before a "Launch" is not much different the day after a "Launch." Ask the people in Austin, or Boston. It's mostly a press release and Sprint acknowledging that there is enough coverage for it to be an official LTE market.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless they are doing something different in New York, once a tower is completed, it is turned on and made public. Coverage the day before a "Launch" is not much different the day after a "Launch." Ask the people in Austin, or Boston. It's mostly a press release and Sprint acknowledging that there is enough coverage for it to be an official LTE market.

 

You never know.... NYC is a special place....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know, people have reported a few towers in Brooklyn and then suddenly the tower isn't on. Probably gearing up for that NYC announcement.

 

That's the nature of testing and the rollout. Towers are up for some time, sometimes go back down for testing or further maintenance. When a tower is complete, it will be turned on. There is no holding back a bunch of towers until they make the announcement and turning them all on at once. That's not how Sprint is doing it. That's been stated many times before, even by Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...