Jump to content

Sprint Organic Network Expansion Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Uhhh, no. Network Vision still continues. In fact, there are some internal conversations about a push to finish up LTE to remaining sites via microwave. We also have seen some evidence of this in Grand Junction, Colorado where permitting recently started to microwave all the remaining sites in that area.

 

Sprint is being much more aggressive in completing existing work as well as adding more scope. This is all good news, no matter where you live. Also, i expect some iDEN sites to replace some sites in rural locations like yours, too.

Does this apply to loner sites that are surrounded by lte completed ones?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 9000 tower's/sites it roughly 180 per state Maryland has 23 counties that would be 7 or so per county in a real world,wonder if Sprint will do this in a real world way.

Nah, I would put all 180 Maryland towers in Garrett County

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are your thoughts? What do you expect? Is it just another daily topic to feed the sheeple? Are we leading the lambs to slaughter? Stay tuned next week for more ESS FOUURR GREWWWWW... errr.

 

Discuss people. 

 

So I was pronouncing it correctly the whole time!!!!!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 9000 tower's/sites it roughly 180 per state Maryland has 23 counties that would be 7 or so per county in a real world,wonder if Sprint will do this in a real world way.

 

This is all speculation, but as noted in the article it will rely on a multitude of factors. In terms of Maryland, I could see little growth in Western Maryland (do people still live there? :P ), but places like southeastern Frederick receiving new towers due to the suburbanization along I-270.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The urban sites portion would be useful in some areas of NYC. Sprint is probably trying to take back their crown as the interstate king. They're probably going to provide substantial enough service that you could drive from coast to coast and not encounter roaming at all. I'm also sure that RRPP is helping them a little bit with this in that some areas, they can simply skip over because the other carriers are doing them instead. 

 

I'M SO EXCITED!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The urban sites portion would be useful in some areas of NYC. Sprint is probably trying to take back their crown as the interstate king. They're probably going to provide substantial enough service that you could drive from coast to coast and not encounter roaming at all. I'm also sure that RRPP is helping them a little bit with this in that some areas, they can simply skip over because the other carriers are doing them instead.

 

I'M SO EXCITED!!!

The service in NYC actually seems to be improving for a change, not a false alarm this time.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 9000 tower's/sites it roughly 180 per state Maryland has 23 counties that would be 7 or so per county in a real world,wonder if Sprint will do this in a real world way.

 

I don't think it'll be in a real world way. They will probably do it percentage wise per market. LA, NYC, and a few other major markets receiving the largest portion of new sites. Of course, this is all speculation. I wouldn't at all mind if they added 50 new sites in just the Las Vegas Market alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like real band 41 expansion lookout tmobile .

Currently, Carter said, T-Mobile has fiber backhaul connections to 50,000 of its sites, out of 60,000 total sites. That decreases costs and allows for more data usage on the network, he said.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobiles-carter-its-myth-sprint-needs-fail-us-succeed/2014-11-13

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently, Carter said, T-Mobile has fiber backhaul connections to 50,000 of its sites, out of 60,000 total sites. That decreases costs and allows for more data usage on the network, he said.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobiles-carter-its-myth-sprint-needs-fail-us-succeed/2014-11-13

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

eh

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert - Any update on 800 in the IBEZ? NE Ohio is patiently waiting.

Sprint has started deploying 800MHz radios in many markets to be ready when rebanding and the IBEZ are clear this year. It will happen one market at a time over the course of 2015, mostly in the second half. We don't have any more info than that, but it's coming.

 

Using Moto X² on Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any expansion in the upstate of South Carolina?

I think it is up in the air right now man. Dude said it best in the article, roaming costs(!$!) prospective growth +$, and once it is rolled out, it is just interest% and opex /$/ I am imagining.

 

Look to areas that survived the meltdown in the city and suburbs, industrial areas that pose growth opportunities, and everyone else is rooting for highways like myself.

 

I live in teh styx now so I would appreciate a stonger rural presence. This should be cool man. I am getting geared up for this already.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the future once we get more specifications on what iDEN sites are being converted, have you thought about creating a new map to show which iDEN sites are being converted or just add them onto the NV Sites Map? I'm looking forward to seeing how much more the coverage grows.

 

tumblr_lzwagsA2Bs1r7n0dh.gif

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so exhausted so I'm not sure if im making sense so please forgive me...

 

Can sprint also pair up with their LTE roaming partners and maybe add 1x voice to their sites?

 

Also will this organic expansion delay any plans with their LTE roaming partners? If not then taking this organic expansion plan and their LTE roaming deal...this is all great for sprint!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...