Jump to content

Sprint Super Bowl Coverage/DAS


Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So data usage is starting to roll out.

Tmobile up 38% (which is starting to turn useless. Because they haven't released a real number for years.

https://www.t-mobile.com/news/super-bowl-53-network-stats

Att 11.5TB in and around the stadium. They also have lots of other numbers with different sets. Like 2 mile radius and weekend data usage.

https://about.att.com/newsroom/2019/touchdown_data.html

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plan ahead! 😀

2020: South Florida, Hard Rock Stadium, Super Bowl 54

2021: Tampa, Raymond James Stadium, Super Bowl 55

2022Los Angeles, Los Angeles Stadium, Super Bowl 56

2023: Glendale, University of Phoenix Stadium, Super Bowl 57

2024: New Orleans, Mercedes-Benz Superdome, Super Bowl 58

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting article: https://www.mobilesportsreport.com/2019/02/super-bowl-53-smashes-wi-fi-record-with-24-tb-of-traffic-at-mercedes-benz-stadium/

Very detailed stats on Wi-Fi usage and the “take rate”.

Verizon also implemented Wi-Fi offloading: “autoconnect in play”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the Wifi usage of 492MB per user that makes tmobiles 129 MB per user look very very bad. I thought the 129MB looked strange before but when we comparing it to what was done on wifi. No wonder tmobile never shows total data used number. They most likely were able to send the fewest amount of data through their pipes.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
6 hours ago, mikejeep said:

Some solid upgrades here. Anyone going to the game or going to be in the area?

Edited by RedSpark
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brad The Beast said:

Would like to know this also. Florida has been a declining Sprint market according to RootMetrics. 

Florida is 7 markets.  ;)

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would like to know this also. Florida has been a declining Sprint market according to RootMetrics. 
Which I don't understand lots of Florida has both 3x41 and 15x15 B25. Now Miami is 3x41 and only 5x5 for everything else but still

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Which I don't understand lots of Florida has both 3x41 and 15x15 B25. Now Miami is 3x41 and only 5x5 for everything else but still

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

I know for the West Palm/Miami market indoor reception reception is a big problem. A lot of concrete and steel building and only 5x5 of B26 which wasn't deployed initially at the start of LTE deployment. Cell spacing isn't the best either for the more residential areas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for the West Palm/Miami market indoor reception reception is a big problem. A lot of concrete and steel building and only 5x5 of B26 which wasn't deployed initially at the start of LTE deployment. Cell spacing isn't the best either for the more residential areas. 
Well hopefully the super bowl is changing all of that

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
    • My wife has a Pixel 8 Pro and has no complaints. I have an S22U and I get slightly better signal than her but 99.9% of the time, its not noticeable. 
    • My favorite is the nexus 6.  Love the form factor also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...