Jump to content


Honored Premier Sponsor
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Flompholph last won the day on November 16 2019

Flompholph had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,207 Wireless Expert

1 Follower

About Flompholph

  • Rank
    Member Level: 4G WiMax

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
  • Gender
  • Location
    Connellsville, Pa
  • Here for...
    4G Information

Recent Profile Visitors

3,733 profile views
  1. No way they are writing the opinion this week. January 15(almost a month) is closing arguments and I am giving them at least a week for anything to be written and filed. Has there been made a distinction between Tmobile 5G and new Tmobile 5G in court? I have not seen any mention of Tmobile 5G being not real high speed 5G in their ads.
  2. Looks like there is still another month+ left for this judge. I am curious how the judge is going to view T mobiles ads about nationwide 5g deployments without the merger and how the merger will help them go faster. Tmobile is in a tough position to talk in to different direction and hope they don't look at the other.
  3. With how reporters are twisting things today(no matter what side of the coin you are on. The other side is twisting things.) no I don't trust them that is why I asked for source material. The "x days" is a reference to the judge setting a bench trial "A bench trial is scheduled before this Court from December 9 through December 20, 2019." It doesn't say I will have a written judgement by the 19th. If you want to tell yourself 9 days be my guess just don't give others hope this train wreck will be over any time soon.
  4. 9 day to complete the case? lol This thing is going to go on for another a year plus if the states want to push it. This court by itself could take a month+ then on to appeals. Has anyone posted the court filings yet? They are public but I think someone needs to buy them some how then they can repost the court filings.
  5. Looks like the dead line has passed and dead maps are showing up. If anyone needs help with mapbox let me know.
  6. So the google API only one person would have access to the script? Then everyone can edit a google sheet and limit the people who edits through google sheet? Also on the mapbox front I learned mapbox studio has a 5 MB limit for datasets (where you can edit in Studio). So you have to replace the tileset with a CSV. I put a demo of the Pittsburgh map in the honored section which was a pain to get the map to size correctly. Also looking at the full NV data through chrome makes my PC hurt a little 65% on a i7 5930K.
  7. So I was able to get different colored pins to show up in mapbox. This may help https://docs.mapbox.com/help/tutorials/add-points-pt-2/#style-as-a-symbol-layer Pretty much have to create a new SVG (image of the pin https://labs.mapbox.com/maki-icons/editor/) then set conditions for each. So you can use the same pin names as fusion but you have to set that "condition" (the fusion pin name) for the svg you made. Not sure how to pull info for a popup within their studio yet. At the very least we should have a map with different color pins if the fusion death time passes.
  8. Is there a reason that the SQL could not be deleted and re imported similar to how I do the SCP notes DB. I use DB Browser to delete the data. Then I export a csv from google sheets to import back in to the specific table in the database. But I have to admit that I have no real experience with SQL. If the new google map still use kml it should not be that hard to make a .kml text file with google sheet script. Either way s4gru should be able to use google sheets to edit the data then have a really limited and trusted group to take the sheets and move it to a map easily.
  9. What is the question? The only thing missing is qam increases. But qam and MIMO kind of fight each other. QAM like strong clean signal and MIMO needs things to bounce off of(spacial defersity). Spacial defersity is why it will probably only be a 8x increase with 32x32 MIMO and not the 16x. (But that is real world vs true capacity.)
  10. There is a community database with a couple markets. If you shared your market data (Site note with GCI) I could add it. It would give me a reason to update the database. Which is amazing that it has been 8 months since last update. I don't care if you use any of the data and I don't think any of the other market mangers would care. But if shared the data is premier data and the same rules apply with how the data is shared.
  11. The argument put forth before I posted was that sprint needed (merger even with DISH) spectrum because of uploads speeds. So how did your phone request the data at 200Mbps if it was upload limited? "faster overall experience" to whom? Which is my point of the white papers most people will notice they can't watch a video more so than my iCloud/google photos won't back up in the background. Professional IRL streamers are less than 1 in 100,000 and they should be using a bonded connection that is using multiple carriers and wifi point 2 point for coverage reasons besides walking between good and bad areas for each carrier. Skype like I said only needs ~.2 Mbps. Downloads are multiplied many times over by MIMO and qam. When adjusting the Config timing so how is zero download excess and have excess uplink and how is that helpful? But without going into "technical stuff" I don't know how to show with "feelings". Used download/upload data and comparing that to capacity the different config capacity with MIMO and QAM included.
  12. There are more devices are on 4g than 5g meaning more noise and chance some one is on the edge of signal using up the RS Blocks. More noise then they have to lower the qam to pass the data. The more RS Blocks used on the edge is less RS Blocks OK that is between you and the white papers I have read. But sorry I believe white papers by Cisco and others over you unless you have white papers showing that upload is used more than downloads. Personally I think it is funny you must believe carriers limit downloaded video to 720p but uploaded videos there is not limit on that. What ever leave your 3 word respond proving me wrong. Complaints have nothing to do with average data usage and where that data is used. Sorry to brake your bubble but people measure this stuff and write reports on this. But I guess the new mantra is to say something enough times or loud enough then it is the truth.
  13. Not if qam is the reason no matter how much B41 thrown at upload it won't matter. It would only go from .1 to .2 Mbps. As long as downloads are working then there is enough uploads. Or you would not be able to request data packets. If someone needs upload that bad they should be forced off the band(load balancing) like they do for downloads. If someone is skyping that is only .1 to .5Mbps upload. If live streaming that is only ~1Mbps. There is no big demand for upload unless you run p2p server on phone.
  14. I think SeanK was looking to see what the blavk ethernet cord plugged into the netgear not the bottom. If your switch does not have enough ports you may need a bigger one. lilotimz i think is guessing the black wire goes to the airave is plugged into the netgear. But the netgear you have to pay for a new ip on each port. So if you pay one ip then it will go to the white wire until it is off then go to the black wire.(guessing white ethernet wire eero and black ethernet wire airave plugged into netgear)
  15. Max Speed would not change you are still limited by the phone design not the tower. More capacity is needed right now on the 4G side. 4x4 phone on 40Mhz is still 600+Mbps but they still need more right.
  • Create New...