Jump to content

tyroned3222

S4GRU Member
  • Content Count

    1,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

tyroned3222 last won the day on July 7

tyroned3222 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

673 Trusted

About tyroned3222

  • Rank
    Member Level: 4G WiMax

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    s6 edge plus
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    US
  • Here for...
    Networking
  • Twitter Handle
    32_tyrone
  • Interests
    Networks

Recent Profile Visitors

1,335 profile views
  1. Ya, but what promoted sprint to add 19 thousand of them in Long Island alone.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Would you consider that in itself a disappointment? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. Very harsh The network is disappointing,” wrote the New Street analysts. “Based on the Tutela data and our own speed tests, it doesn’t seem like the deployment of 19,000 small cells has improved Sprint’s network much. There is little evidence of improvement year over year; Sprint’s network in Long Island appears worse than in the rest of the country, and Sprint still lags the other national carriers in Long Island.” I think what happened year over year a good amount of these small cells had already been rolled out.... so, the few more added In the years time frame didn’t help improve the network much Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. It has started Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. That work is happening behind closed doors Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. Many analyst believe that is what’s happening behind closed doors Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. I personally think sprint is in a better position to do so! Their capex had already been tied into many upgrades ( billons spent over the years). Dish is starting from scratch, they themselves have 10 billion at best from what they have said. The only way this turns out with a happy ending, if they get a bigger player with a heavy cash infusion, unlike what SoftBank did. I believe sprint spent 24/25 billion into network vision and Believe it or not it put them ahead in terms of newer equipment at the sites ( both at the top and base stations. Verizon still runs many legacy sites using LTE. In many areas, sprint is starting to outperform TMO on capacity after finally upgrading sites to b41. That alone would bring more competition as sprint could start pulling customers away from TMO. I think the main issue would be the ROI. Presenting a 5 year plan with heavy investing to investors and the board and than say it’s up in the air if we make a return on investment. That’s the only issue I see Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Again as I mentioned. Although numbers are getting better sprint is not seeing any money! No return on investment at all, they lost 111 million for the quarter.. you carry those type of numbers over 4 quarters those are huge losses https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2019/08/02/sprint-first-quarter-continues-losses.amp.html?ana=yahoo&__twitter_impression=true Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. That is true, but there is still 0 ROI on any of it Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. The FCC and DOJ are currently plotting to counterattack the state AGs lawsuit. FCC may issue unusual ruling supporting the merger that explicitly states that there are no anti-trust issues. Some have called this a form of undermining the states A statement like that is aimed for an audience of one. The judge that is Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Yes, that’s what Neville plans is. This was Neville quote.. it is the fastest and smoothest way to transition everyone Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. I’m sure the strategy is to get those customers into newer handsets and to TMO favor in a band 71 capable device and get a great deal to do so Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. I guess only 20 million handsets are capable of it .. most newer phones are .. most older ones can’t Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...