Jump to content


S4GRU Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


tyroned3222 last won the day on July 7

tyroned3222 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

673 Trusted

About tyroned3222

  • Rank
    Member Level: 4G WiMax

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    s6 edge plus
  • Gender
  • Location
  • Here for...
  • Twitter Handle
  • Interests

Recent Profile Visitors

1,310 profile views
  1. It has started Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. That work is happening behind closed doors Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. Many analyst believe that is what’s happening behind closed doors Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. I personally think sprint is in a better position to do so! Their capex had already been tied into many upgrades ( billons spent over the years). Dish is starting from scratch, they themselves have 10 billion at best from what they have said. The only way this turns out with a happy ending, if they get a bigger player with a heavy cash infusion, unlike what SoftBank did. I believe sprint spent 24/25 billion into network vision and Believe it or not it put them ahead in terms of newer equipment at the sites ( both at the top and base stations. Verizon still runs many legacy sites using LTE. In many areas, sprint is starting to outperform TMO on capacity after finally upgrading sites to b41. That alone would bring more competition as sprint could start pulling customers away from TMO. I think the main issue would be the ROI. Presenting a 5 year plan with heavy investing to investors and the board and than say it’s up in the air if we make a return on investment. That’s the only issue I see Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. Again as I mentioned. Although numbers are getting better sprint is not seeing any money! No return on investment at all, they lost 111 million for the quarter.. you carry those type of numbers over 4 quarters those are huge losses https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2019/08/02/sprint-first-quarter-continues-losses.amp.html?ana=yahoo&__twitter_impression=true Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. That is true, but there is still 0 ROI on any of it Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. The FCC and DOJ are currently plotting to counterattack the state AGs lawsuit. FCC may issue unusual ruling supporting the merger that explicitly states that there are no anti-trust issues. Some have called this a form of undermining the states A statement like that is aimed for an audience of one. The judge that is Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Yes, that’s what Neville plans is. This was Neville quote.. it is the fastest and smoothest way to transition everyone Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. I’m sure the strategy is to get those customers into newer handsets and to TMO favor in a band 71 capable device and get a great deal to do so Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. I guess only 20 million handsets are capable of it .. most newer phones are .. most older ones can’t Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Tmo is reporting 20 million handsets Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Yes, they will all be brought under one core.. 20 million sprint customers are ready for it via firmware update Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. Is it not reciprocal roaming In the same filing, T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray also provided some details on how T-Mobile plans to migrate Sprint customers to its network once the merger is approved. Ray said that it will move existing T-Mobile and Sprint customers to a common core network. That will require T-Mobile’s engineering team to bridge the two standalone core networks together. To do that, they will use a bridge technology called multi-operator core network (MOCN), which basically uses a virtual single core network to route services to the T-Mobile core. At the same time, T-Mobile engineers will increase the scale of T-Mobile’s core network to handle increased traffic created by the new Sprint customers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Create New...