Jump to content

Sprint Super Bowl Coverage/DAS


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mikejeep said:

Sprint appears to be surging ahead with the big gameday crowds on Tutela..fbcae481f6384c0649c11a0071b93467.jpg

Sure seems like it...

Sprint’s 5G looks like the big winner this year. Curious what the final reports will show.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brad The Beast said:

Graph has updated. Sprint is in last again. These graphs are garbage. What is it based on?? You refresh it and it changes to something else. Median download speeds hardly ever update. 

I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I'll be near the Dolphins stadium, but I'll be in Miami (at/near the airport) Wednesday night. Will be interesting to see how the LTE network performs once the town is back to normal, which it should be by then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ookla has published their report. Sprint came in third for overall speed, second for LTE speed. https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/football-stadium-speed-2020/

TLDR:

Verizon wins overall thanks to excellent 5G speeds (297.18Mbps average overall). It did however come in last for LTE speed (30.67Mbps average LTE speed).

T-Mobile comes in second for overall download speed (121.93Mbps average overall). First for LTE speed (66.35Mbps average LTE speed).

Sprint was in third for overall speed (114.93Mbps average overall). Second for LTE speed behind T-Mobile (56.16Mbps average LTE speed).

AT&T came in last again for overall speed (103.68Mbps average overall). Third in LTE speed (39.18Mbps average LTE speed).

5G Specific data:

Verizon had the fastest 5G thanks to their mmWave. They had an average 5G download speed of 646.17Mbps. They had the slowest average 5G uploads at 9.86Mbps. Verizon had the worst average 5G latency at 91ms.

T-Mobile came in second for 5G speed thanks to the mmWave they also rolled out. Their average 5G download speed was 348.33Mbps. They had the fastest 5G upload speed at 28.89Mbps. Their average 5G latency was 32ms.

Sprint came in third for 5G speed. Their average 5G download speed was 225.78Mbps. Their average 5G upload speed was 15.39Mbps. Their average 5G latency was 15ms, the best of the three reported.

AT&T didn't make the 5G cut. According to Ookla there were less than 10 AT&T 5G tests. As a result they didn't make it in.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Brad The Beast said:

Sprint came in third for 5G speed. Their average 5G download speed was 225.78Mbps.

This is surprisingly slow. Not sure why that would be. I don't believe the NR airlink would have been saturated...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

This is surprisingly slow. Not sure why that would be. I don't believe the NR airlink would have been saturated...

From the Sprint Newsroom Site:

At the Miami stadium where Sprint’s hometown Kansas City team and San Francisco will face off, we’ll provide even more Sprint customers with improved capacity and faster speeds on Game Day (as well as future games, events and concerts). Based on the huge increase in customers’ data usage last year and in 2018, we’re using two different technologies this year to help meet fans’ demands to stream, download, video chat, text and connect on social.

  • In and around the stadium, Sprint’s Massive MIMO radios using our fast 2.5 GHz spectrum and breakthrough “split-mode” feature will enable us to simultaneously deliver our most-advanced LTE service and Sprint 5G for customers attending the showdown in person.
  • In addition, we will be providing 4G/5G dual connectivity within the stadium, transmitting 4G over a state-of-the-art distributed antenna system (DAS) with more than 1,800 antennas and 5G through Massive MIMO radios.

Together, these solutions will provide the equivalent of 10 macro cell towers at the stadium. That will give fans the coverage and capacity they need whether they’re in their seats, at the concession stand or tailgating in the parking lot.

.........

Was the backhaul saturated? Not enough Massive MIMO radios?

Edited by RedSpark
Updated
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have we reached peak data? ATT data usage went down from 11.5 TB to 10.2 TB in stadium and 23.5TB to 14.5TB 2 mile radius. The last couple years it has doubled should be interesting to see the others.

 https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2020/01/data_network_football_game_2020.html

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flompholph said:

Have we reached peak data? ATT data usage went down from 11.5 TB to 10.2 TB in stadium and 23.5TB to 14.5TB 2 mile radius. The last couple years it has doubled should be interesting to see the others.

 https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2020/01/data_network_football_game_2020.html

I don't think you can read too much into it without lots of other variables filled in. How many AT&T devices were at the stadium (and within 2 miles) this year compared to last year? Also, Hard Rock Stadium is kind of in the middle of nowhere, at least population / destination wise.. especially compared to last year, in Downtown Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-customers-record-amounts-data-super-bowl

Verizon's numbers are out also with 21.5 TB in and around the stadium. 

This is the first time in 5 years data has not grown massively. Sprint for example 2015 754GB ,2016 1.6TB, 2017 5TB, 2018 9.7TB, 2019  25TB, and now 2020 7TB.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Flompholph said:

https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-customers-record-amounts-data-super-bowl

Verizon's numbers are out also with 21.5 TB in and around the stadium. 

This is the first time in 5 years data has not grown massively. Sprint for example 2015 754GB ,2016 1.6TB, 2017 5TB, 2018 9.7TB, 2019  25TB, and now 2020 7TB.

That is interesting.

Unless I’m missing it, T-Mobile only released this information: 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RedSpark said:

That is interesting.

Unless I’m missing it, T-Mobile only released this information: 

 

 

I mean Sprint really did quite well. Very well.  But the importance of that extremely quick 5G ping time (latency) can NOT be overstated!  Nice! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Wow.

For comparison....

Here's what Verizon is doing: https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-elevates-super-bowl-lv

Here's what AT&T is doing-in-part (more information is referenced in an earlier link): https://www.fiercewireless.com/operators/at-t-s-mmwave-5g-takes-off-at-tampa-airport

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Some pretty solid upgrades here!

Summarized:

  • $100+ million investment in 5G infrastructure across the city. More than 95% of people in Greater Los Angeles are now covered with T-Mobile’s super-fast Ultra Capacity 5G network.
  • At SoFi Stadium, T-Mobile deployed a brand new state-of-the-art 5G system with upgraded 100 Gigabit backhaul and the deployment of Ultra Capacity 5G service using mid-band and millimeter wave spectrum. Gives SoFi the capability equal to nearly 100 traditional macro cell sites. T-Mobile customers could experience peak download speeds of 1.5 Gbps.
  • Across the city, indoor systems have been upgraded at more than a dozen venues, including Los Angeles Convention Center, Crypto.com Arena and LA’s most popular and largest hotels. At LAX, T-Mobile now provides 5G service at Tom Bradley International Terminal and Mid-Field Satellite Concourse.
  • Hundreds of macro sites have been upgraded and nearly 200 small cells across the city have been installed or upgraded with Ultra Capacity 5G increasing the density and capacity of the network and providing peak speeds up to 1 Gbps.

Here's what AT&T is doing:

And Verizon:

More info: https://www.verizon.com/about/news/speed-january-31-2022

 

Nice overall analysis here: https://www.lightreading.com/5g/verizon-atandt-and-t-mobile-again-rally-around-5g-for-super-bowl/d/d-id/775159

Edited by RedSpark
Added AT&T/Verizon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BucketHead25 said:

Am I the only one tired of these super bowl stories?  This event is for the elites who can afford to spend $5000 for a ticket to a 3 hr show.   

This thread is specifically about Super Bowl mobile coverage. From a tech standpoint, it's pretty cool to see what can be accomplished. I would suggest skipping over it in the future if you're not interested. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BucketHead25 said:

Am I the only one tired of these super bowl stories?  This event is for the elites who can afford to spend $5000 for a ticket to a 3 hr show.   

Nothing in this thread (running for seven years now!) has anything to do with the cost of tickets or "elites". It's purely focused on the network/upgrades that each carrier deploys in the Host City for the Game.

Each carrier is deploying the best network that it can for a high profile/huge capacity event, and it's neat to see their talking points about what makes their network the best vs. the others. The really cool thing is that many of these upgrades are permanent. So as time has gone on with the Game being hosted in different cities, these Host City networks have substantially improved as technology advances.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...