Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I believe the main reason that Marcelo is so quiet about NGN is because of the network equipment leasing vehicle.  It is very likely network equipment vendors will likely accept some cash as payment for sprint's capital expenditure but also accept some of the payment as long term lease.  Both vendors and Sprint have every incentives not to reveal the vendors because they don't want other providers especially Tmobile (who does not have that much cash either) to request vendors to extend them similar treatments.  

 

Back on January 7, 2015, Sprint posted the following:

 

Sprint Closes on $2.1 Billion of Financing with Three New Vendor Financing Agreements and Existing Loan Expansion

 

OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (BUSINESS WIRE), January 07, 2015 - Sprint Corporation (NYSE: S) announced today that it has signed three new vendor financing facilities totaling $1.8 billion to purchase 2.5 GHz network equipment and related services from key suppliers. Sprint also amended and expanded by $300 million its credit relationship with Export Development Canada (EDC) as well as amended the terms of its existing secured equipment credit facility.

“These deals provide Sprint with greater flexibility and liquidity options as we focus on growing the business and investing in our network,” said Joe Euteneuer, Sprint’s Chief Financial Officer.

The three new vendor financing agreements are:

  • A secured facility for up to $800 million from Nokia Networks maturing in June 2021. It is backed by credit insurance provided by Finnvera plc, the export credit agency of Finland.
  • A secured facility for up to $750 million from Samsung maturing in Dec. 2022. It is backed by credit insurance provided by the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation (Ksure), the export credit agency of Korea.
  • A secured facility for up to $250 million from ALU maturing in Dec. 2021. It is backed by credit insurance provided by Delcredere | Ducroire (D/D), the export credit agency of Belgium.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, it's not all good news. This Verified Care Rep said his entire call site is closing down on February 5th.

 

Via the Sprint Subreddit

This is all a part of their cost reduction strategy already announced. Nothing new here. They are doing it in stages.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Back on January 7, 2015, Sprint posted the following:

 

Sprint Closes on $2.1 Billion of Financing with Three New Vendor Financing Agreements and Existing Loan Expansion

 

OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (BUSINESS WIRE), January 07, 2015 - Sprint Corporation (NYSE: S) announced today that it has signed three new vendor financing facilities totaling $1.8 billion to purchase 2.5 GHz network equipment and related services from key suppliers. Sprint also amended and expanded by $300 million its credit relationship with Export Development Canada (EDC) as well as amended the terms of its existing secured equipment credit facility.

“These deals provide Sprint with greater flexibility and liquidity options as we focus on growing the business and investing in our network,” said Joe Euteneuer, Sprint’s Chief Financial Officer.

The three new vendor financing agreements are:

  • A secured facility for up to $800 million from Nokia Networks maturing in June 2021. It is backed by credit insurance provided by Finnvera plc, the export credit agency of Finland.
  • A secured facility for up to $750 million from Samsung maturing in Dec. 2022. It is backed by credit insurance provided by the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation (Ksure), the export credit agency of Korea.
  • A secured facility for up to $250 million from ALU maturing in Dec. 2021. It is backed by credit insurance provided by Delcredere | Ducroire (D/D), the export credit agency of Belgium.

 

These vendor financing are debts.  If they utilize these financing, they will increase their net debts which management trying to avoid.  The network equipment leasing vehicle works as if the vendors still own the equipment and Sprint leases these equipment from them.  The difference between the two is one Sprint owns the equipment but its net debts will increase, and other one Sprint does not own the equipment but leases them from vendors and has no effect on debts.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These vendor financing are debts.  If they utilize these financing, they will increase their net debts which management trying to avoid.  The network equipment leasing vehicle works as if the vendors still own the equipment and Sprint leases these equipment from them.  The difference between the two is one Sprint owns the equipment but its net debts will increase, and other one Sprint does not own the equipment but leases them from vendors and has no effect on debts.  

 

Appreciate the explanation on that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It read in an article that sprint could mimic 5G speeds with opening all of there carrier aggregation pipes...any truth to this?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

3xCA, and 4x4 MIMO is probably more than capable.  Sprint mentioned late last year they plan on experimenting with up to 5xCA soon, so we'll see what happens as it gets closer.  If it's as simple as adjust backhaul and installing a carrier card, it may be an easy transition, especially if they have NGN going full throttle.

While Sprint could come up with 5XCA I didn't think there was a true definition of what 5G is yet or the speeds it could produce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im sure not every single market will get lte plus..

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

But what is a market? A town? A city? A metro? Sprint has just under 100 markets. That is how they divide their network. But, the latest announcement has over 100 markets with LTE plus. So, again, what is a market? There is no way to answer your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad news for the City of Bristol, Sprint is closing its customer care facility next month , more than 400 people will be effected by the closure.

 

New article ----> http://m.wcyb.com/news/Sprint-laying-off-hundreds-in-Blountville/37580010

According to the Reddit thread on this topic, 6 call centers are closing and 2000 people are losing their jobs. Sprint is apparently going to go "all-in" on vendor-provided customer care which I'm sure will be top tier! /sarcasm

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Reddit thread on this topic, 6 call centers are closing and 2000 people are losing their jobs. Sprint is apparently going to go "all-in" on vendor-provided customer care which I'm sure will be top tier! /sarcasm

Every company that goes this route soon finds out it does not work.  The vendor will hire anybody and everybody and none of then will have a clue. You will get transferred around, lied to, and whatever it takes to just cover up your issue.

Sprint even tried it in the past and it failed. It will fail again.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen when companies go to vendor-provided customer care (aka outsourcing), the company requires certain metrics from the vendor (call answer time, time on phone, CSAT, etc). The vendor does anything possible to meet the requirements: as you said; lie to the customer, transfer them when the time on the phone gets higher than target, etc. By the time the company knows what's really going on, they have a bad reputation and are barely 1 year in a 5 year contract with the vendor.

 

Source: a company I worked for prior tried outsourcing phone support. They maintained an escalations desk in-house. Shortly it was apparent only the escalations desk actually solved any customer problems, so the vendor was fired shortly thereafter.

 

This being said, Sprint has used vendor-provided care for a long time (a Xerox-owned company, I forget the name, was their vendor at least as of 2013) so maybe this will be more successful. At least, successful for people other than the 2000 being laid off.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Reddit thread on this topic, 6 call centers are closing and 2000 people are losing their jobs. Sprint is apparently going to go "all-in" on vendor-provided customer care which I'm sure will be top tier! /sarcasm

Every company that goes this route soon finds out it does not work. The vendor will hire anybody and everybody and none of then will have a clue. You will get transferred around, lied to, and whatever it takes to just cover up your issue.

Sprint even tried it in the past and it failed. It will fail again.

The $2.5B in cuts has to come from somewhere and execs have said many times that everything is on the chopping block.

 

I don't think you can make the jump that Sprint will outsource a lot of their customer care. They might outsource some, but I don't think they'll go 1 for 1. They may have found they can provide customer care with fewer call centers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I read in the Reddit thread, these are IL call centers, aka, most of us. The CL call centers, aka business or Corporate Liable, are still staying open. Playing favorites with business customers is not a smart move, especially when a large majority of customers are most likely individuals. I sure hope this announcement of the closing call centers doesn't make investors mad come morning, prompting a large sell off like we just started getting out of.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I read in the Reddit thread, these are IL call centers, aka, most of us. The CL call centers, aka business or Corporate Liable, are still staying open. Playing favorites with business customers is not a smart move, especially when a large majority of customers are most likely individuals. I sure hope this announcement of the closing call centers doesn't make investors mad come morning, prompting a large sell off like we just started getting out of.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Actually, it'll be good for the investors to know that costs are going down, in my opinion. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good phone care was one thing sprint had going for it, they weren't perfect but they were the most consistent of any company I've had to call into several times and the most polite. If that goes by the wayside that would be quite a shame considering corporate retail as a rule of thumb has been horrendous. (Though I do acknowledge that some have reported good experiences). I won't jump to any conclusions, but this sounds bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Reddit thread on this topic, 6 call centers are closing and 2000 people are losing their jobs. Sprint is apparently going to go "all-in" on vendor-provided customer care which I'm sure will be top tier! /sarcasm

Employees of the Bristol Sprint call center thought their jobs would have been safe, apparently its the only call center in the country that handles calls from other Sprint employees. 

 

Its a shame too because Sprint just built that facility about 3 or 4 years ago in Bristol, TN when they re-located from Bristol, VA, what will they ever do with the road they named "Sprint Dr"

 

Updated news article regarding the Bristol Sprint facility 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever I try to use chat it always says it's unavailable.

The chat works very well, but I have the same problem. Last two times I needed something had to keep checking back all day until it was available.

 

Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...