Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

That video just gave me more confidence, like a pep talk after a 3-8 season but you still feel like your going to at least get the wildcard to have a shot at the championship. When they said talk less and do more. That was a standing ovation.

The video answered a lot of questions but they still want to stay quiet on the network upgrades so the competition does not know? You can say broad things like "X markets will see over 5,000 new sites, macro and small cells by the end of 2016." Meh, I am glad they finally answered the service disruption question. That was what most people were concerned about in regards to the site relocations.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The video answered a lot of questions but they still want to stay quiet on the network upgrades so the competition does not know? You can say broad things like "X markets will see over 5,000 new sites, macro and small cells by the end of 2016." Meh, I am glad they finally answered the service disruption question. That was what most people were concerned about in regards to the site relocations.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

 

Competitive intelligence is a very important thing to keep in mind here. Sprint clearly doesn't want to give away any information that a competitor can take advantage of to the detriment of Sprint, and even the most seemingly innocuous piece of info can be a gold mine for the competition to know in terms of deducing Sprint's resources or strategy. These competing companies have multiple people on staff, or retain outside experts to do competitive intelligence modeling based on every single utterance a Sprint Executive makes.

 

These Sprint executives are clearly well aware of this, and I'm glad Sprint is being smart about how this is handled.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

BingeOn looks like it has been a disaster for their network.

If you think BingeOn hurt their network you're sorely mistaken. At least for now, BingeOn has resulted in an INCREASE in network speed and capacity. Reducing all video streams to 480p saves tons of bandwidth. Their rapid subscriber growth has had a big impact on network speeds. Sub growth has outpaced their network upgrades, resulting in reduced performance.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, Marcelo just sent out a letter to employees explaining the reasons for moving up the Earnings Call:

 

When I looked back at what we accomplished with our network over the past year, I’ve got to tell you, it’s clear to me that we have a really good and positive story. I’m excited because no other wireless carrier made greater improvement than we did, and this gives us such a solid foundation to make our network even better. That’s why I found it so frustrating – to tell you the truth, I was really angry! – when the media reports came out with rumors about our network plans.

Last Friday, Re/code published an article saying that we were going to take $1 billion in operating expenses out of our network, and move our equipment off towers we lease. This led to more speculation by other publications and analysts, and some of them jumped to inaccurate conclusions. Some were saying we are going to make our network worse and they questioned the strength of our company’s finances for the longer term. With all of these rumors flying, we’ve seen a steep drop in our stock price.

I’m a big believer that we need to address something like this head-on, so I want to talk about it with you. And we also will tell Wall Street analysts, investors and reporters next week because we moved up our quarterly results announcement from when it was initially planned. We will be working through the weekend so we can get everything ready in only a few days. Usually we spend more than two weeks working through the final details for reporting our results. But we don’t want to wait this time because we are going to set the record straight!

 

Via the Sprint Subreddit

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That video gave me so much more hope!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

If you're that much of a believer, buy some Sprint stock! Investing is based on "hope" you know....   :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're that much of a believer, buy some Sprint stock! Investing is based on "hope" you know.... :)

That I do know lol.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Competitive intelligence is a very important thing to keep in mind here. Sprint clearly doesn't want to give away any information that a competitor can take advantage of to the detriment of Sprint, and even the most seemingly innocuous piece of info can be a gold mine for the competition to know in terms of deducing Sprint's resources or strategy. These competing companies have multiple people on staff, or retain outside experts to do competitive intelligence modeling based on every single utterance a Sprint Executive makes.

 

These Sprint executives are clearly well aware of this, and I'm glad Sprint is being smart about how this is handled.

Only if they created a map of sites they're going to upgrade in the next few months. Similar to how they had the roadmap for Nextel removals. AT&T was following the map and sending ads to former Nextel subs. That was dumb, however, I feel like reassuring the consumer has more beneficial impact on Sprint than staying quiet. Something broad like this post today is good.

 

It emphasizes that their consumers experiences are important, and that they are working on it. People are skeptical, after the whole WiMax/Network Vision fiasco.

 

If you think BingeOn hurt their network you're sorely mistaken. At least for now, BingeOn has resulted in an INCREASE in network speed and capacity. Reducing all video streams to 480p saves tons of bandwidth. Their rapid subscriber growth has had a big impact on network speeds. Sub growth has outpaced their network upgrades, resulting in reduced performance.

I think the unlimited data for all users until March is what's hurting the network the most. Once that ends, I fully expect speeds to pick back up.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the unlimited data for all users until March is what's hurting the network the most.  Once that ends, I fully expect speeds to pick back up.

I doubt the speeds will increase in bigger cities. Maybe smaller towns might see some improvements, but here in NYC, its brutal. Sprint without the second carrier have slowed down to sub 5mbs average, Att has been horrible here. Tmobile used to be a heck of alot faster, now its closer to 5-10mbs. Only Verizon has held up well, but even their speeds have taken a big hit.

 

It's crazy to think 10mbs during business hours in Midtown is actually as good as it gets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the speeds will increase in bigger cities. Maybe smaller towns might see some improvements, but here in NYC, its brutal. Sprint without the second carrier have slowed down to sub 5mbs average, Att has been horrible here. Tmobile used to be a heck of alot faster, now its closer to 5-10mbs. Only Verizon has held up well, but even their speeds have taken a big hit.

 

It's crazy to think 10mbs during business hours in Midtown is actually as good as it gets.

Honest question: what day to day usage of a phone needs more than 10 megabits per second? I'm not at all trying to be antagonistic here I just don't understand how people use their phones to need more speed than that today.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This far into a project with the equipment already being designed and made, what could be left of a secret?

Funding for the actual installs. AT&T had major network plans either last year or the year before and stopped half way through because the cost of upgrading was much higher than anticipated.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This far into a project with the equipment already being designed and made, what could be left of a secret?

I think they're referring more to the densification strategy with small cells?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will sprint have to continue offering the 50% promo to win customers?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

Sprint previously extended it because it was working. And not every one of those customers ultimately chooses the 50% off plan from the offer page or when in the store. It starts a conversation and gets people in the store or on the website. Some of those customers wind up choosing the $70/month Unlimited Plan instead ($60 for each additional line if they want to add friends/family to it), which isn't discounted.

 

It's a good question. We'll see.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honest question: what day to day usage of a phone needs more than 10 megabits per second? I'm not at all trying to be antagonistic here I just don't understand how people use their phones to need more speed than that today.

My point is not how usable 5, 10 or even 20mbs is (I think 99% of users would be totally satisfied with 10mbs average) But rather what will those numbers look like in another 6 months to a year. 

 

We know Att is busy deploying WCS, Verizon is king of small cell and Sprint has 2.5, what will Tmobile do? I think 600Mhz will do nothing for them and unlicensed spectrum would take mounds more density.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is not how usable 5, 10 or even 20mbs is (I think 99% of users would be totally satisfied with 10mbs average) But rather what will those numbers look like in another 6 months to a year. 

 

We know Att is busy deploying WCS, Verizon is king of small cell and Sprint has 2.5, what will Tmobile do? I think 600Mhz will do nothing for them and unlicensed spectrum would take mounds more density.

The only thing they really can do is refarm Edge to B2 LTE for additional capacity.  I'd have to look up how much PCS T-Mobile has in NYC, though.  I agree that Sprint's capacity plans are golden for now.  I would personally like Sprint to announce their 5G plans soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint extended it because it was working. And not every one of those customers ultimately chooses the 50% off plan from the offer page or when in the store. It starts a conversation and gets people in the store or on the website. Some of those customers wind up choosing the $70/month Unlimited Plan instead ($60 for each additional line if they want to add friends/family to it), which isn't discounted.

So do you think they will continue to offer it?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing they really can do is refarm Edge to B2 LTE for additional capacity. I'd have to look up how much PCS T-Mobile has in NYC, though. I agree that Sprint's capacity plans are golden for now. I would personally like Sprint to announce their 5G plans soon.

It read in an article that sprint could mimic 5G speeds with opening all of there carrier aggregation pipes...any truth to this?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It read in an article that sprint could mimic 5G speeds with opening all of there carrier aggregation pipes...any truth to this?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

3xCA, and 4x4 MIMO is probably more than capable.  Sprint mentioned late last year they plan on experimenting with up to 5xCA soon, so we'll see what happens as it gets closer.  If it's as simple as adjust backhaul and installing a carrier card, it may be an easy transition, especially if they have NGN going full throttle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3xCA, and 4x4 MIMO is probably more than capable. Sprint mentioned late last year they plan on experimenting with up to 5xCA soon, so we'll see what happens as it gets closer. If it's as simple as adjust backhaul and installing a carrier card, it may be an easy transition, especially if they have NGN going full throttle.

Not just 4x4, 8x8 right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the main reason that Marcelo is so quiet about NGN is because of the network equipment leasing vehicle.  It is very likely network equipment vendors will likely accept some cash as payment for sprint's capital expenditure but also accept some of the payment as long term lease.  Both vendors and Sprint have every incentives not to reveal the vendors because they don't want other providers especially Tmobile (who does not have that much cash either) to request vendors to extend them similar treatments.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is not how usable 5, 10 or even 20mbs is (I think 99% of users would be totally satisfied with 10mbs average) But rather what will those numbers look like in another 6 months to a year.

 

We know Att is busy deploying WCS, Verizon is king of small cell and Sprint has 2.5, what will Tmobile do? I think 600Mhz will do nothing for them and unlicensed spectrum would take mounds more density.

From what I am reading, I am not seeing the typical user experience being 5 mg in a market that has LTE Plus completed so I'm not sure it's a valid concern to worry about what the future will be like. I think the future will be LTE Plus with speeds as far as I am seeing that are significantly greater than what you are describing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I am reading, I am not seeing the typical user experience being 5 mg in a market that has LTE Plus completed so I'm not sure it's a valid concern to worry about what the future will be like. I think the future will be LTE Plus with speeds as far as I am seeing that are significantly greater than what you are describing.

Not to sound condescending or anything,

 

But, did you actually read my post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...