Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Since this is a discussion thread, I'm just going to say that I wish my phone had a Sprint logo on it. Only so I could help promote the company. Also because I like the logo. What are your thoughts?

Print out and paste the Sprint logo onto your phone.  ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer how Sprint's doing it now, leaving phones close to stock from the manufacturer.

Agreed! I have long disliked att and Verizon's tacky approach to posting their ugly-ass carrier logos all over every phone they sell.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed! I have long disliked att and Verizon's tacky approach to posting their ugly-ass carrier logos all over every phone they sell.

 

Especially now that they aren't subsidized!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may be an educated geographer, but I have a Masters in City and Regional Planning. I still cant identify a Sprint antenna on a pole, but when it comes to demographics, economic trends, transportation, and what people are looking for in making their decissions on where to live and work, I am fully up to date on the statistics and literature.

 

When it comes to recruiting, Kansas City is a liability, not an asset.

 

The question is, is it enough of a liability to justify a very expensive move?

 

I still think you undervalue the development diversity of the Kansas City metro.

 

One, if a young Sprint recruit wants an urban lifestyle, he or she can always live downtown and commute to Overland Park.

 

Two, I hope that -- as an educated city planner -- you have read Joel Garreau's book "Edge City."  Kansas City has multiple "edge cities," but those of interest for people seeking an urban lifestyle are Crown Center/Crossroads District and the Country Club Plaza.  Marcelo lives in a treed, mansioned, "old money" neighborhood but five minutes from the Country Club Plaza.

 

Three, honestly, the Sprint Campus/Leawood Town Center is an emerging "edge city."  Right across the street from the Sprint Campus is a "New Urbanism" development filled with shops, restaurants, bars, and a hotel at walkable street level, then hundreds of apartments and lofts above.  The AMC Theatres headquarters is there -- plus a 20 screen AMC movie theatre just down the block.  Ericsson and ZTE have offices there.  That young Sprint "hipster" recruit could live there and even walk or bike across Nall Ave to work.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add one more counterpoint to the discussion, Omaha.  It is a smaller, non major league, and less attractive city than Kansas City.  Yet, Omaha has an impressive five longstanding Fortune 500 companies.  They have not relocated to other cities.  They are able to recruit employees.  The idea that the Midwest is a non destination is false, and it seems to be floated by people with a coastal bias.

 

AJ

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record...I've lived in Maryland (an hour from the coast) my entire life. If given the opportunity to move to the Midwest, I would. But I work for the federal government, which is mostly consolidated in my area...when I think Sprint, I think Kansas City. When I think T-Mobile, I think Seattle. Different strokes for different folks. I think Sprint's image fits well with their HQ, as does T-Mobile.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add one more counterpoint to the discussion, Omaha.  It is a smaller, non major league, and less attractive city than Kansas City.  Yet, Omaha has an impressive five longstanding Fortune 500 companies.  They have not relocated to other cities.  They are able to recruit employees.  The idea that the Midwest is a non destination is false, and it seems to be floated by people with a coastal bias.

 

AJ

 

The last sentence is dead nuts on.  :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So back on topic, I really do want to see the small cells in action here.

 

I did not know that this discussion was about small cells and that discussion of Marcelo possibly moving the headquarters away from Overland Park was off topic in the Marcelo thread.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not know that this discussion was about small cells and that discussion of Marcelo possibly moving the headquarters away from Overland Park was off topic in the Marcelo thread.

 

;)

 

AJ

 

;) Just saying...ya know?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add one more counterpoint to the discussion, Omaha.  It is a smaller, non major league, and less attractive city than Kansas City.  Yet, Omaha has an impressive five longstanding Fortune 500 companies.  They have not relocated to other cities.  They are able to recruit employees.  The idea that the Midwest is a non destination is false, and it seems to be floated by people with a coastal bias.

 

AJ

 

It also does not hurt to have the head of Berkshire Hathaway in the area.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add one more counterpoint to the discussion, Omaha.  It is a smaller, non major league, and less attractive city than Kansas City.  Yet, Omaha has an impressive five longstanding Fortune 500 companies.  They have not relocated to other cities.  They are able to recruit employees.  The idea that the Midwest is a non destination is false, and it seems to be floated by people with a coastal bias.

 

AJ

As well as several others that are in the Fortune 700s that most cities would kill for like TD Ameritrade, Valmont (center pivot irrigation), West (telecommunications), Tenaska and Green Plains (both agri-energy companies). Two of the top 25 largest architectural firms in the country (Leo A. Daily and HDR), Gallup (polling), Omaha Steaks etc.

It also does not hurt to have the head of Berkshire Hathaway in the area.

It does lead to some interesting scenes...

1405362532000-Screen-Shot-2014-07-14-at-

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also: https://twitter.com/marceloclaure/status/633839695449878532

 

Marcelo responded that a "Forever" program would be coming for Android as well.

I wonder if it'll be a broad program where anyone with any Android phone can switch to another Android phone or if it's only for specific lines (S6 to S7, Note 5 to Note 6, etc)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does lead to some interesting scenes...

 

 

Wow, would you look at that?!  Jimmy Buffett and Paul McCartney together.  That must have been one great concert.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-saw-our-network-densification-wont-be-traditional-slow-and-expensiv/2015-08-19

 

Sprint's Saw: "Our network densification won't be 'a traditional slow and expensive build'"

I'll take a "I'll believe it when I see it" stance on that.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it'll be a broad program where anyone with any Android phone can switch to another Android phone or if it's only for specific lines (S6 to S7, Note 5 to Note 6, etc)

 

Indeed. However, I'd be satisfied if it at least covered the flagships like Samsung Galaxy S6, HTC M9, LG G4. That covers far more ground. 

 

I'll take a "I'll believe it when I see it" stance on that.

They came, they saw, they conquered.  :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add one more counterpoint to the discussion, Omaha. It is a smaller, non major league, and less attractive city than Kansas City. Yet, Omaha has an impressive five longstanding Fortune 500 companies. They have not relocated to other cities. They are able to recruit employees. The idea that the Midwest is a non destination is false, and it seems to be floated by people with a coastal bias.

 

AJ

Mid-major Midwest markets are a non-destination. No young, future graduate of an AAU university is dreaming of ending up in Omaha, NE. They're thinking of NY, LA, SF, Mia, Chicago, Boston, and other metropolitan areas. I would support your case for St. Louis and Kansas City, but Omaha?!

 

There's only 2 things to do in Nebraska: 1. Watch Nebraska football and 2. Watch corn grow. And with the recent terrible coaching change, its going to be watching corn grow all year round for that state.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it'll be a broad program where anyone with any Android phone can switch to another Android phone or if it's only for specific lines (S6 to S7, Note 5 to Note 6, etc)

 

Marcelo can definitely make the economics of this work by leveraging his experience with BrightStar... not to mention the fact that BrightStar is also owned by SoftBank.

 

No carrier can match this business unit integration.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...