Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Users Thread!


nexgencpu

Recommended Posts

So what is this update supposed to fix? If there's not a new radio I'm either waiting for an ota(if there is one) or just going to put it off for awhile.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

New radio and probably a kernel patch for towelroot. We'll know more when AOSP is updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone wanna test drive the radio? I'm going to fire it up now and do some measurements.

Edit: Why is the N5 listed as LTE/GSM on the factory image page?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone wanna test drive the radio? I'm going to fire it up now and do some measurements.

Edit: Why is the N5 listed as LTE/GSM on the factory image page?

I would like to, but I'm trying to remember how to flash this. I always use the zips....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after you have extracted the files..

 

 

adb reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash bootloader <bootloaderfile.img>
fastboot reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash radio <radiofile.img>
fastboot reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash boot boot.img
fastboot flash system system.img
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

after you have extracted the files..

adb reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash bootloader <bootloaderfile.img>
fastboot reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash radio <radiofile.img>
fastboot reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash boot boot.img
fastboot flash system system.img

No new bootloader, so there is no need to flash it. Also no need to reboot-bootloader in between radio and boot/system.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

after you have extracted the files..

adb reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash bootloader <bootloaderfile.img>
fastboot reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash radio <radiofile.img>
fastboot reboot-bootloader
 
fastboot flash boot boot.img
fastboot flash system system.img

No need to flash new bootloader, right?

 

Edit: Stressing NEED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know I always do it so it matches the factory image exactly... it only takes seconds...

 

those are (edited) commands straight out of the flashall.bat file, so if google says for me to do it, ima gonna do it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know I always do it so it matches the factory image exactly... it only takes seconds...

 

those are (edited) commands straight out of the flashall.bat file, so if google says for me to do it, ima gonna do it.

Touche... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took them many many months for an update and now a second one within a few weeks.  Crazy.  And a new radio, that shocked me.

 

Limited testing...  B25 is about the same.  I'm going to go for a ride in a bit and see how B26 performs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know I always do it so it matches the factory image exactly... it only takes seconds...

 

those are (edited) commands straight out of the flashall.bat file, so if google says for me to do it, ima gonna do it.

Thanks, I'm all flashed up now.  Really appreciate it.

 

EDIT: Trying xposed module now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.16 looks pretty good. I can't compare it to .23, .17, or 1.13, but on Band 25 it's only about 6 dbm worse than .15. I don't have any B26 or B41 here though, so y'all will have to test that for me.

 

It looks like EVDO performance is very close to and 1x800 performance is slightly better (4ish dbm) than .15's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.16 looks pretty good. I can't compare it to .23, .17, or 1.13, but on Band 25 it's only about 6 dbm worse than .15. I don't have any B26 or B41 here though, so y'all will have to test that for me.

So far my results is about the same as yours. I'm about to go for a ride and a sec and see how it performs in places I frequent most.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.16 looks pretty good. I can't compare it to .23, .17, or 1.13, but on Band 25 it's only about 6 dbm worse than .15. I don't have any B26 or B41 here though, so y'all will have to test that for me.

 

It looks like EVDO performance is very close to and 1x800 performance is slightly better (4ish dbm) than .15's.

 

A .03 bump is not going to change performance very much at all. You're seeing normal variation in signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A .03 bump is not going to change performance very much at all. You're seeing normal variation in signal.

This. The changes may not even be related to Sprint. They could be T-Mobile specific, or GSM in general. Let's not forget that the Nexus 5 is first and foremost a GSM phone, and the fact that it works at all on Sprint is, for all intents and purposes, gravy.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Two s24 ultras, both say fully up to date. One has T-Mobile and Verizon network, Service provider software version 17, carrier config version 2, and few apps [google play system March 1], other with T-Mobile, Dish Rainbow Sim, Verizon Network (inactive), Service provider software version 19, no carrier config, and many apps [Google play system April 1]
    • Since T-Mobile is testing the fiber waters for a time when FWA needs to be paired back, here is an article comparing the two costs (performance differences not mentioned): https://www.fierce-network.com/broadband/nextlink-ceo-compares-fixed-wireless-fiber. 
    • Checked and found a 2.7mb Google Play System 'security' update pending.   Post install the update date still showing April 1st however.
    • The May security update is out.
    • A new SignalCheck Pro update is now available on Google Play! Notable changes: Improved duplicate LTE GCI cleanup function. Duplicates with the greater number of recorded connection 'hits' will now be kept. Duplicate entries appear for a variety of reasons but can cause neighbor cell notes to display improperly. Strongly recommend running this cleanup function occasionally. Improved site note logging functionality. Better matching of co-located cells and prior Sprint sites. Overhauled display functions to fully re-sync all information when reopening app or with swipe-down gesture. The swipe-down gesture now essentially restarts the core functions of the app. Other changes: Added 5G-NR band to notification pulldown title. Added accent colors for additional wireless providers. Added option to disable street address geocoding when editing a site note; coordinates will populate instead. Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved identification of unregistered 5G-NR cells. Improved LTE PLMN identification on some devices. Resolved issue with log import proceeding when log backup fails. Resolved issue with some 5G-NR connections displaying improper band. Resolved issue with some 5G-NR neighbor cells displaying improper band. Updated internal libraries. As always, I appreciate everyone's support. Dual SIM bugs are *still* being ironed out but it is a priority to resolve. Thanks!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...