Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Users Thread!


nexgencpu

Recommended Posts

Im talking stock vs stock not modified nexus vs unmodifed G2. In that respect the nexus will not win. No Spark update. Smaller battery, ok camera.

Debatable but RF performance is a huge one, even on stock my n5 had upwards of 10dbm increase in signaI . I do like the screen colors stock wise of the g2 more, but saying the nexus will not win is an opinion. Both have ups and downs. But i like both phones,  and both are winners in my book!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess LG is the real winner in all of this. I played with the nexus for one day and found battery life to be okay and stock android to be surprisingly boring. I do love the screen just like my G2 and I love the fact that I can switch carriers at anytime.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly they both have ups and downs, both are great devices, but the G2 is only $499. I do miss my n5 RF wise and wireless charging wise. The g2 is more prone to breaks when dropped. And easier to drop in my opinion. Im keeping both phones, and will switch between the two.

Huh its listed as $699 for full retail(what I was going off of) on Amazon. That was my point though, there's at least 20 options when you walk into a store (not including older models of phones) and phones are kind of at the limits of what we need hardware wise. Its purely personal preference that causes someone to chose a phone now days, because they're all essentially identical hardware wise and just have different software features.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tweeted Sprintcare asking about the Nexus 5 Spark update. Here is the (lame) response:

 

Thanks for the question. We are still working LG to get a fix for our customers. *SJL

 

Sounds like LG is the hold up? Maybe it's not a high priority for LG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tweeted Sprintcare asking about the Nexus 5 Spark update. Here is the (lame) response:

 

Thanks for the question. We are still working LG to get a fix for our customers. *SJL

 

Sounds like LG is the hold up? Maybe it's not a high priority for LG?

Or maybe the glorified CS Reps that man the twitter account have no idea what they are talking about ????

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory, spark update goes from LG>sprint>Google (assumed collab in between)

 

Right? It is possible Google isn't even sitting on it yet...

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I guess its possible. In my head though I'd assume once lg was able to get the G2 update out the n5 one would've been soon after (due to the n5 being based off the G2). So I'd think Google has it and the issue is with the radios and not screwing up other carrier support.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its possible. In my head though I'd assume once lg was able to get the G2 update out the n5 one would've been soon after (due to the n5 being based off the G2). So I'd think Google has it and the issue is with the radios and not screwing up other carrier support.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

The g2 was likely an easier fix since it was sprint only. The nexus 5 has to work on all north american bands

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The g2 was likely an easier fix since it was sprint only. The nexus 5 has to work on all north american bands

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

That's what I was trying to say, in response to the comment that it could be lg that's the hold up. Lg's portion of the update wouldn't be much different than it was for the G2. Google handles the parts where there'd be issues(from what I understand). If I'm missing something or not understanding please correct me.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I was trying to say, in response to the comment that it could be lg that's the hold up. Lg's portion of the update wouldn't be much different than it was for the G2. Google handles the parts where there'd be issues(from what I understand). If I'm missing something or not understanding please correct me.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

no its unlocked so lg has to have a modem that handles all carriers for the nexus 5 they can't just push out a sprint fix.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no its unlocked so lg has to have a modem that handles all carriers for the nexus 5 they can't just push out a sprint fix.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I thought Google handled the modem/baseband and lg just handled the hardware side of it?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is correct.

So would I be correct in thinking the things lg had to go for the g2 update would be quite similar to the n5's? So the hold up would have to be on Google's end at this point?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So would I be correct in thinking the things lg had to go for the g2 update would be quite similar to the n5's? So the hold up would have to be on Google's end at this point?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

For the G2 update, Either LG or Sprint (whoever actually deals with the modem, my money's on sprint) had to get the modem to work with sprint's network.  for the N5, Google (Since neither sprint or LG have any direct software input) has to get the modem to work for sprint, while still allowing it to work with all other carriers.  That, along with the reasoning of a post a while back talking about google's priority (essentially sprint users are not a high one) means it's not ready yet.  I'm sure if it was a feature every nexus user could use, it would be done by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the G2 update, Either LG or Sprint (whoever actually deals with the modem, my money's on sprint) had to get the modem to work with sprint's network. for the N5, Google (Since neither sprint or LG have any direct software input) has to get the modem to work for sprint, while still allowing it to work with all other carriers. That, along with the reasoning of a post a while back talking about google's priority (essentially sprint users are not a high one) means it's not ready yet. I'm sure if it was a feature every nexus user could use, it would be done by now.

Alrighty I think I've got everything straightened out in my head. I personally believe our update has been done for awhile and Google just decided to wait to push it out until they can squash some of the bugs too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alrighty I think I've got everything straightened out in my head. I personally believe our update has been done for awhile and Google just decided to wait to push it out until they can squash some of the bugs too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

hopefully. we'll see pretty soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is any only else getting data connection dropping out. Comes back in seconds

Yup, I have been for awhile but I didn't know it was exactly that. It usually comes to my attention when I get the text sent noise from textra but it doesn't actually send. I just toggle airplane mode for a second.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious if you guys are having the same issues I have been having. I found that having B26 enabled was my issue. Try disabling B26 if it isn't available in your market (especially you kojitsari since you are in the same market as me). I haven't had the issue since on my G2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious if you guys are having the same issues I have been having. I found that having B26 enabled was my issue. Try disabling B26 if it isn't available in your market (especially you kojitsari since you are in the same market as me). I haven't had the issue since on my G2.

 

I have my phone set to cdma/auto due to LTE not being fully available at my hone yet, it saves my battery a lot. So I wouldn't think having the extra hands enabled would really matter, I'll try it today and see what happens though

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...