Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

lol wtf? What's their "sell" on a phone that is exactly the same as Google's version, but costs hundreds of dollars more? I guess that price is there just to get the dummies who walk into a Sprint store, aren't eligible for an upgrade discount, and want to buy the phone on the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait!!!!! hopefully my order gets bumped up and shipped sooner. ordered a 32GB White Nexus 5. :D

 

now the fun part is getting ahold of the SIM card for it. How likely are Sprint sales reps going to understand and be willing to give/sell the SIM card?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't think of a single reason anybody would buy this phone from Sprint off contract...

Only reason I can think is google's horrible supply issues.  I could see some people paying the $90 premium to get the device when they want vs playing the waiting and luck game with google getting them in stock and then hopefully you buying one before they sell out again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean "I can't think of a single reason anybody would buy this phone from Sprint ON contract..."" right?

If you have no intention on leaving Sprint why would you pay $350 when you can get it for $150?  Not having a subsidized phone on a carrier that structures its pricing around subsidizing is wasting money.

Edited by shifted
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean "I can't think of a single reason anybody would buy this phone from Sprint ON contract..."" right?

No, he means "off". The reason to buy it "ON" contract is because it's cheaper - $199. But "off" contract from Sprint, at full price, it's hundreds more than Google's price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have no intention on leaving Sprint why would you pay $350 when you can get it for $150?  Not having a subsidized phone on a carrier that structures its pricing around subsidizing is wasting money.

What if you are not eligible for an upgrade discount yet, like me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have no intention on leaving Sprint why would you pay $350 when you can get it for $150?  Not having a subsidized phone on a carrier that structures its pricing around subsidizing is wasting money.

 

Well, not everyone has an upgrade laying around. And if I did, I'd rather save the upgrade for a device where the subsidized price makes more of a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have no intention on leaving Sprint why would you pay $350 when you can get it for $150? Not having a subsidized phone on a carrier that structures its pricing around subsidizing is wasting money.

You're assuming folks aren't going to use their subsidized upgrade for a different device that has a more handsome resale value.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, I've read Sprint's PR about the Nexus 5 and I know pre-rders open tomorrow and the device will be available next Friday for $150 for the 16GB version on contract - BUT I was wondering if anyone can confirm that Sprint will be offering the 32 GB version as well (and what the pricing would be).

 

I know it seems like a stupid question but the PR doesn't mention the 32 GB version at all, nor does it mention pricing... I just think it's suspicious that they're not mentioning such a simple thing. Any help?

 

I'm trying to decide if I should buy the 32 GB version through Google Play or Sprint... I have an upgrade but I'm worried that they won't be offering the 32 GB version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean "I can't think of a single reason anybody would buy this phone from Sprint ON contract..."" right?

No, off. On makes sense if you don't mind a contract and want a cheaper device. OFF contact makes no sense since Google is selling an identical device for less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, off. On makes sense if you don't mind a contract and want a cheaper device. OFF contact makes no sense since Google is selling an identical device for less.

 

Exactly, buy it OFF contract from Google. I wouldn't buy it off contract from Sprint, that's not what I was trying to imply. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah not surprised about this, tmobile did the same thing with the nexus 4.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah not surprised about this, tmobile did the same thing with the nexus 4.

I think this may point to Google selling these things at cost to consumers (or maybe even a small loss). However, they probably refuse to sell them to carriers at a loss/even and add the mark up on them when carrier bound. This was my hypothesis with the Nexus 4. And I'm still holding on to that thought.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the phone require a micro SIM from Sprint or no SIM at all?

 

What do these bands mean, 800/850/1900?

CDMA: Band Class: 0/1/10

Would be awesome if none so we could activate them online like I did with my Nexus S when I got it.  I know this is a different scenario though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the phone require a micro SIM from Sprint or no SIM at all?

 

What do these bands mean, 800/850/1900?

CDMA: Band Class: 0/1/10

Authenticating to LTE will definitely require a SIM. No idea on CDMA, although my guess is like the iPhone 5c/5s it will do SIM authentication rather than by ESN.

 

BC 10 is 800 (ESMR). I think 0 is 850 (Cellular) and 1 is 1900 (PCS).

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have no intention on leaving Sprint why would you pay $350 when you can get it for $150? Not having a subsidized phone on a carrier that structures its pricing around subsidizing is wasting money.

Because you want the phone now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Sprint charge that stupid $36 fee when you bought from Play Store since they aren't an authorized Sprint dealer (from what I've aware of)

I believe all activations incur this charge, no matter origin of the device

 

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...