Jump to content

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)


Recommended Posts

to followup with yesterdays post about me spotting 800 1x on actual maine sites...i found another site as well outside of Sanford.  this specific one was brought online within the last day or so because it wasnt seen on Tuesday night.  I will be away next week and with the way they are working I expect to get back into the area and see some significant upgrades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can any phone do a handoff between 800 and 1900 w/o dropping a call?

I think that might be more of an artifact of some sites being legacy 1900 and the 800 sites all being network vision. The problem isn't with the frequencies themselves, but with the coordination between the basestations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can any phone do a handoff between 800 and 1900 w/o dropping a call?

Absolutely. It's not phone dependent anyway, from what I understand, it's the network. Switching between frequencies shouldn't cause a dropped call. Switching between roaming and non-roaming will.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. It's not phone dependent anyway, from what I understand, it's the network. Switching between frequencies shouldn't cause a dropped call. Switching between roaming and non-roaming will.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

Thanks for the info.  I was under the impression that it might take a while for the phone's antenna to retune from 1900 to 800 and connect to the tower quickly enough without dropping the call.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed there hasn't been much info on how the roll out of refarmed 800 mhz is going... are they having problems? Is it a bigger undertaking than they expected?

In the individual market threads a lot of people have talked about connecting to 1x800.  In addition the accepted map is showing more and more 1x800 sites accepted by Sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly Robert isn't getting the same constant source of 800 activations like he is for 3G and 4G acceptances. So it's entirely possible that there are more 800 acceptances than we realize.

I thought we the people could help him with pictures and proof of a tower with 800 and 4G and ect. But I guess that's not enough lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we the people could help him with pictures and proof of a tower with 800 and 4G and ect. But I guess that's not enough lol

We could but if the rest of the community is anything like me, they care more about the deployment of 800/1900/2600 LTE more :-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we the people could help him with pictures and proof of a tower with 800 and 4G and ect. But I guess that's not enough lol

I'm with Robert on this. It is much better to know the data you're sharing is completely accurate; relying on user reports to confirm 800 acceptance isn't the best idea. It would be very easy for someone with good intentions and a reasonable amount of technical knowledge to think they are connected to a certain site on 800 and be mistaken. Pictures don't mean much; even if there is something 800-specific that could be spotted, nobody is debating that the equipment is there.. it was installed at the same time all the other stuff was. And of course, just because a site is broadcasting something at that moment doesn't mean it bas been accepted. Lots of variables!

 

-Mike

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Robert on this. It is much better to know the data you're sharing is completely accurate; relying on user reports to confirm 800 acceptance isn't the best idea. It would be very easy for someone with good intentions and a reasonable amount of technical knowledge to think they are connected to a certain site on 800 and be mistaken. Pictures don't mean much; even if there is something 800-specific that could be spotted, nobody is debating that the equipment is there.. it was installed at the same time all the other stuff was. And of course, just because a site is broadcasting something at that moment doesn't mean it bas been accepted. Lots of variables!

 

-Mike

But see, if someone posts pics of a tower with the ID and it broadcasting 800SMR and a month later. Posts an update and it's still live. I think that is credible enough. But I understand  the whole process.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But see, if someone posts pics of a tower with the ID and it broadcasting 800SMR and a month later. Posts an update and it's still live. I think that is credible enough. But I understand  the whole process.

 

I have the authority to make CDMA1X 800 acceptance reports and have made plenty in my home state.  So, if you want more CDMA1X 800 acceptance reports, all you need to do is pay me to come to your town because I have the spectrum analyzer, engineering screen know how, and S4GRU street cred.

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But see, if someone posts pics of a tower with the ID and it broadcasting 800SMR and a month later. Posts an update and it's still live. I think that is credible enough. But I understand the whole process.

I hear you, but I think it's very difficult to confirm you are actually connected to the CDMA 800 site you think you are. In my corner of suburbia, I can get strong signals from multiple sites in many areas, especially on 800. I've been parked near a tower that I was convinced I was connected to.. crazy-strong signal, seemed to weaken as I moved away from it.. nope. Figured out it was a totally different site. I'm sure that isn't an issue in less dense areas, but I think overall it's enough of a concern.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But see, if someone posts pics of a tower with the ID and it broadcasting 800SMR and a month later. Posts an update and it's still live. I think that is credible enough. But I understand  the whole process.

 

Particularly if the SID is no longer 22429. Once the site has been broadcasting a market-specific SID for a few weeks, I think it's safe to say it's been accepted.

 

I hear you, but I think it's very difficult to confirm you are actually connected to the CDMA 800 site you think you are.

 

You don't trust your app (or rather, the phone) to report accurate 1x site coordinates? It was my understanding that the coordinates reported by NV site sectors are much more precise than legacy sites, whose coordinates were often offset to some degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the authority to make CDMA1X 800 acceptance reports and have made plenty in my home state.  So, if you want more CDMA1X 800 acceptance reports, all you need to do is pay me to come to your town because I have the spectrum analyzer, engineering screen know how, and S4GRU street cred.

 

AJ

Oh damn baller. I like your sarcasm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh damn baller. I like your sarcasm.

 

Well, I am not being entirely sarcastic.  If you want to pay to bring me to Fort Wayne, we could probably do it.  One of my tutoring students just relocated back to Oklahoma City, and I made two 700 mile roundtrips to meet with him over the past week.  So, I do not mind travel.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't trust your app (or rather, the phone) to report accurate 1x site coordinates? It was my understanding that the coordinates reported by NV site sectors are much more precise than legacy sites, whose coordinates were often offset to some degree.

Hah, I wish! Unfortunately, that is not true. Many areas still have the offset, including mine. Around me, many sites have been broadcasting LTE for over a year and they turned 800 on about 2 months ago.. if they were going to change the coordinates, I'm afraid they would have by now. A couple did change slightly, but they did not get any more accurate.. just moved a few small decimal digits over, still nowhere near the site. I have never discovered a site in the Boston market broadcasting its true location. :(

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never discovered a site in the Boston market broadcasting its true location. :(

 

Bummer. FWIW, the NV sites I've come across in the Chicago, Central and East Iowa markets have always been within a block of where they say they are ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am not being entirely sarcastic.  If you want to pay to bring me to Fort Wayne, we could probably do it.  One of my tutoring students just relocated back to Oklahoma City, and I made two 700 mile roundtrips to meet with him over the past week.  So, I do not mind travel.

 

AJ

Well Shoot cause I know you love to be here. 700 miles what 200$ gas ? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bummer. FWIW, the NV sites I've come across in the Chicago, Central and East Iowa markets have always been within a block of where they say they are ;)

 

Yeah, those are some of the few markets that have actually broadcast their locations somewhat accurately. In the Nebraska market, Kansas market, Colorado market, and Missouri market, the locations that sites broadcast, even NV sites, are no where close to correct :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, those are some of the few markets that have actually broadcast their locations somewhat accurately. In the Nebraska market, Kansas market, Colorado market, and Missouri market, the locations that sites broadcast, even NV sites, are no where close to correct :(

Have we determined if this is an OEM issue? That is to say, is one of the OEMs updating the broadcast coordinates to be correct and the other two aren't? Or two are and one isn't?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, those are some of the few markets that have actually broadcast their locations somewhat accurately. In the Nebraska market, Kansas market, Colorado market, and Missouri market, the locations that sites broadcast, even NV sites, are no where close to correct :(

really? Like if a tower is near the interstate, Lol it puts the dot right on the interstate. But it's within 10 ft of being accurate here. It's 99% accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...