Jump to content

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)


Recommended Posts

How can u tell when u are on smr 800 as opposed to the other bands

You can use the app posted above SignalCheck (consider the pro version, it is awesome) or use the debug screen. Looks like you have a EVO Shift, open up the dialer and try ##DEBUG# .... if that works choose 1X Engineering and look at SID and Band # you are connected to
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tk u need to update actually on iphone5 now

 

To enter the engineering screen on the iPhone, from your phone app type *3001#12345#* then call. I can't speak to the engineering screen when you have an LTE connection because its completely different and I haven't been in an area that has LTE yet (at least not long enough to mess with the engineering screen). But when you have a 3G connection you'll see two option to choose from: 1x and EVDO. For some reason the 1x screen on the iPhone 5 does not list all of the line item data (whereas on the 4s it shows the channel and frequency for your connection), so the only way I know of to tell if you're on an SMR connection is if your SID reads 22xxx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been out of touch for a couple of weeks. But I saw there were some new PRL's. I went and updated mine on the GNex. It went from 25012 to 25013, for what it's worth.

 

State: idle

SO:

Channel: 350

Band Class: 1

 

Not sure if those are useful or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

:(

shucks

 

Also the stock PRL doesnt scan 800smr in the New Orleans market yet either. You will have to write the one of the ones in the sponsor area that does.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright got the LG Optimus G and Ive got the 25013 PRL. Now I am in Memphis, TN and im hoping that this means I m getting 800 in my area. Question is this PRL given to the phones that will support 800SMR or is the handed out per region?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well im hoping for my tower being that it used for everyone within a 5 square mile area. That they approve 800 soon. I may be wrong but i thought i read somewhere that they turn it on sometimes before it is fully approved through Sprint. I may have drummed that up myself just out of pure want, so correct me if I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't believe the iPhone will show you, the engineering screen sucks on it for 1x.

 

I think it's something wrong with 6.1.2 and the 5. Maybe iOS 7 will fix that.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I may have jumped the gun a little. Sprint took away my 800mhz goodness this weekend and I'm back on 1900. I am assuming they were just testing it last week and getting downtilt measurements etc. However, the testing I did get to do, there were absolutely ZERO dropout zones that I could find in Columbus, IN. The 3 major dropouts I had at work were all filled with a completely usable signal, at worst dropping to around 98dBm in a stairwell. I even made calls upstairs and continued all the way into the basement without a single hiccup or breakup. It was a crystal clear call.

 

Here's hoping they turn it back on again soon...I miss it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I may have jumped the gun a little. Sprint took away my 800mhz goodness this weekend and I'm back on 1900. I am assuming they were just testing it last week and getting downtilt measurements etc. However, the testing I did get to do, there were absolutely ZERO dropout zones that I could find in Columbus, IN. The 3 major dropouts I had at work were all filled with a completely usable signal, at worst dropping to around 98dBm in a stairwell. I even made calls upstairs and continued all the way into the basement without a single hiccup or breakup. It was a crystal clear call.

 

Here's hoping they turn it back on again soon...I miss it.

 

Well the good thing is that you were able to experience what the coverage will be like. Now you'll have your expectations level set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When do towers get 1x Advanced? With 800Mhz or when a tower os 3G upgraded?

 

I believe when the tower is upgraded to Network Vision, it should have the 1x Advanced carrier card installed at the BTS. The big question is what advantage did Sprint decide to implement between 4x capacity or 70% more coverage?

 

IMO, Sprint should opt for the 4x capacity so that they can reduce the number of 1x carriers to conserve spectrum and the fact that the cell towers are optimized for 1900 MHz spacing already. I guess people can argue that there can be some areas where the 70% coverage would be the better option than the 4x capacity. Sprint should only have to deploy one 1x Advanced carrier at 800 and 1900 MHz with 4x capacity enabled on each and the saved spectrum should be invested into more EVDO and LTE carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe when the tower is upgraded to Network Vision, it should have the 1x Advanced carrier card installed at the BTS. The big question is what advantage did Sprint decide to implement between 4x capacity or 70% more coverage?

 

IMO, Sprint should opt for the 4x capacity so that they can reduce the number of 1x carriers to conserve spectrum and the fact that the cell towers are optimized for 1900 MHz spacing already. I guess people can argue that there can be some areas where the 70% coverage would be the better option than the 4x capacity. Sprint should only have to deploy one 1x Advanced carrier at 800 and 1900 MHz with 4x capacity enabled on each and the saved spectrum should be invested into more EVDO and LTE carriers.

 

I definitely hope they have 4x capacity on all 800 carriers. We want add many people as possible to be able to use that. In rural areas I think 70% more coverage would be much better suited. 4x capacity would be crazy over kill in those areas unless they are severely spectrum constrained.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right here are some questions i have...

 

I'm using the SignalCheck Lite app, and it lists my 1xRTT RSSI @ -92 , while my EV-DO is listed at -97 is it possible i have 2 different towers, 1 for 1X and a different for EV-DO? If not, why the difference in signal strength? Does Sprint have EV-DO deployed on all of its towers currently?

 

Also, assuming i was connecting to a 800 SMR tower for both 1X and LTE...would i have *roughly* the same signal strength for both?

 

What is also on my mind is that Sprint seems to have more issues with obtaining signals versus other wireless providers...how is a Tri-Band device going to perform versus a single or dual band device? wont there be more issues with trying to connect to the cell signal? Will most towers only get 2 bands?

 

It bugs me that your smartphone experience can differ greatly between device brands on the same network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right here are some questions i have...

 

I'm using the SignalCheck Lite app, and it lists my 1xRTT RSSI @ -92 , while my EV-DO is listed at -97 is it possible i have 2 different towers, 1 for 1X and a different for EV-DO? If not, why the difference in signal strength? Does Sprint have EV-DO deployed on all of its towers currently?

 

You can be connected to three different sites at once, 1 for 1x, 1 for EVDO and another for LTE.

 

Also, assuming i was connecting to a 800 SMR tower for both 1X and LTE...would i have *roughly* the same signal strength for both?

 

Not sure but 1x will likely be more usable.

 

What is also on my mind is that Sprint seems to have more issues with obtaining signals versus other wireless providers...how is a Tri-Band device going to perform versus a single or dual band device? wont there be more issues with trying to connect to the cell signal? Will most towers only get 2 bands?

 

PCS 1900 spectrum is the bread and butter for Sprint. It offers high capacity at the cost of (or due to the benefit of) high site density. The drawback to its use in the LTE build out is because it has such a high site density it takes a while to build out. Verizon and AT&T use 700 MHz spectrum which due to its lower frequency travels much further and has a low site density. For example, if a town requires 8 sprint PCS 1900 sites to cover it effectively, it may only require 2 or 3 Verizon 700mhz sites to cover the same area. Crews work at the same speed regardless of provider so you can see why Sprints build out takes longer.

 

Later this year Sprint will use its 800 MHz spectrum for LTE to get that same low band spectrum benefit. Because Sprint plans to use more sites with low band spectrum than vzw and ATT you should see better signal with Sprint than other providers in the same market areas served.

 

It bugs me that your smartphone experience can differ greatly between device brands on the same network.

 

That's just a product of the device OEMs

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lynyrd, please fix your quote/response.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right here are some questions i have...

 

I'm using the SignalCheck Lite app, and it lists my 1xRTT RSSI @ -92 , while my EV-DO is listed at -97 is it possible i have 2 different towers, 1 for 1X and a different for EV-DO? If not, why the difference in signal strength? Does Sprint have EV-DO deployed on all of its towers currently?

 

Also, assuming i was connecting to a 800 SMR tower for both 1X and LTE...would i have *roughly* the same signal strength for both?

 

What is also on my mind is that Sprint seems to have more issues with obtaining signals versus other wireless providers...how is a Tri-Band device going to perform versus a single or dual band device? wont there be more issues with trying to connect to the cell signal? Will most towers only get 2 bands?

 

It bugs me that your smartphone experience can differ greatly between device brands on the same network.

 

I'm going to try to answer all of your questions as quickly as possible.... Yes you can connect to two different towers for different signals. Your phone will usually choose there one that is less congested.

 

Roughly the same signal or 1X and LTE, but I would expect LTE to be a little worse. Since it's a much more complex signal it degrades quicker.

 

A tri-band device should be far superior to others. Mostly because it has more usable signals to choose from. Sprint normally operates on the 1900mhz frequently which doesn't travel as far as lower frequencies so that's why they seem to have more trouble getting a signal, unlike Verizon or ATT. However since Sprint can user their 800mhz frequency with tri-band devices soon their network will be superior to others. Most towers will get 800mhz.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am due for an upgrade now and was looking for some advice. I hear lots about the tri and dual band LTE devices. I was wondering if you think that I should just go ahead and upgrade even if the next big device (HTC One or S4) doesn't support it? And if you think I should wait, when do you think sprint will start selling these mysterious dual and tri band devices?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am due for an upgrade now and was looking for some advice. I hear lots about the tri and dual band LTE devices. I was wondering if you think that I should just go ahead and upgrade even if the next big device (HTC One or S4) doesn't support it? And if you think I should wait, when do you think sprint will start selling these mysterious dual and tri band devices?
the best guess is 2nd half of this year. Sprint IS deploying 1900Mhz LTE right now and hasn't yet begun to deploy 800 and won't until iDEN is shut down in June. So 1900 is the only one you'll be using in the near future regardless. 800 CDMA 1xAdvanced should be out before LTE and already is in some places... Devices already support that

 

I guess what I'm saying is- it doesn't matter

 

EDIT: Removed mistaken reference to EV-DO.

Edited by MacPCS
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile Fires Back At AT&T After Their Statements On T-Priority
    • February is always closer than you think! https://stadiumtechreport.com/news/caesars-superdome-gets-matsing-deployment-ahead-of-super-bowl-lix/ Another Super Bowl, another MatSing cellular antenna deployment. Caesars Superdome, home of the NFL’s New Orleans Saints, has deployed a large number of cellular antennas from MatSing as part of an effort to increase wireless network capacity ahead of the upcoming Super Bowl LIX in February, 2025. It is the third such deployment of MatSing equipment at Super Bowl venues in as many years, following cellular upgrades at Allegiant Stadium for Super Bowl LVIII and at State Farm Stadium for Super Bowl LVII. According to the Saints, the MatSing antennas were part of a large wireless overhaul this offseason, done primarily “to satisfy fans’ desires for wireless consumption and bandwidth,” an important thing with Super Bowl LIX coming to the venue on Feb. 9, 2025. Each year, the NFL’s big game regularly sets records for wireless data consumption, with a steady upward progression ever since wireless networks were first put into stadiums. https://www.neworleanssaints.com/news/caesars-superdome-transformation-2024-new-orleans-saints-nfl-season-part-1-wifi-upgrades-wireless-cellular During the offseason renovation project, the foundation of the facility's new Distributed Antenna System (DAS) was the installation of 16 multi-beam, wideband spherical lense antennas that are seven feet in diameter and weigh nearly 600 pounds apiece, a model called the MatSing MS-48H180. Another 16 large antenna spheres of varying sizes and frequencies have also been installed for a total of 32 new large antennas, in addition to 200 cellular antennas inside and around the building, all of these products specifically made for high-density environments such as stadiums and arenas. The DAS system's performance is expected to enhance further as it becomes fully integrated throughout the season. The MatSing MS-48H180 devices, with a black color that matches the Caesars Superdome's roof, each were individually raised by hoist machines to the top of the facility and bolted into place. Each cellular antenna then transmits 48 different beams and signals to a specific area in the stadium, with each sphere angled differently to specifically target different coverage areas, allowing increased, consistent coverage for high-density seating areas. In addition to creating targets in seating and common areas throughout the stadium, these antennas create dedicated floor zones that result in improved coverage to the field areas for fans in 12 field-level suites and the Mercedes-Benz End Zone Club, teams and on-field media and broadcast elements. The project is also adding 2,500 new wireless access points placed in areas such as concourses, atriums, suites and food and beverage areas for better WiFi coverage.
    • https://www.yahoo.com/news/dallas-county-completes-first-911-194128506.html - First 911 call/text received over Starlink/T-Mobile direct to cell.  This appears to be in Dallas County, MO.
    • FCC: "We remain committed to helping with recovery efforts in states affected by Hurricane Helene. We stand ready to do all that is necessary to return connectivity to hard-hit areas and save lives." SpaceX: "SpaceX and @TMobile have been given emergency special temporary authority by the @FCC to enable @Starlink satellites with direct-to-cell capability to provide coverage for cell phones in the affected areas of Hurricane Helene. The satellites have already been enabled and started broadcasting emergency alerts to cell phones on all networks in North Carolina. In addition, we may test basic texting (SMS) capabilities for most cell phones on the T-Mobile network in North Carolina. SpaceX’s direct-to-cell constellation has not been fully deployed, so all services will be delivered on a best-effort basis." Space posted this at 2pm today on X.
    • https://ibb.co/KrTR877 https://ibb.co/DK3MVgw https://ibb.co/VgWtZwR Should work with these links
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...