Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Milwaukee Market (including Madison)


sajanisch

Recommended Posts

I have still been doing sensorly with the LTE discovery app on my 21 mile route to work every morning. Nothing new to report and its been almost 2 months. Does it seem like there are only a few crews working in our market? At the current pace we will be lucky to get LTE by late this year in the MKE Metro Area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me jaded but since Sprint will not provide even soft date committals take any timeframes with huge dosages of salt. When I commiserated with the store rep about the horrible data service on 3G when I returned my phone, I got the sense their return rate had skyrocketed. He also said they are pulling off the Nextel antennas, etc. and that this was degrading the bandwidth even more.

 

Dies this make sense ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me jaded but since Sprint will not provide even soft date committals take any timeframes with huge dosages of salt. When I commiserated with the store rep about the horrible data service on 3G when I returned my phone, I got the sense their return rate had skyrocketed. He also said they are pulling off the Nextel antennas, etc. and that this was degrading the bandwidth even more.

 

Does this make sense ?

 

No, because Nextel is on a totally different frequency (800 Mhz) than Sprint 3g (1900 Mhz). What you will see is Sprint 800 SMR turning on in the Milwaukee market after the Nextel decommissioning (from July 1 on), and dramatic improvements in voice & text.  This has certainly happened in the Chicago market, which has been able to convert excess Nextel 800 Mhz capacity to 1x800 service even in advance of the Nextel shutdown.

 

For example, driving back to Crystal Lake from Milwaukee just a few minutes ago, I picked up 1x800 in Richmond IL (literally at the Cheddar Curtain sorry, Wisconsin state line), and carried a conference call entirely on 1x800 all the way from there to south of McHenry IL (about 15 miles with widely spaced towers) without any static, no drops, no hiccups in voice quality, in short, with perfect reception for the whole distance.  This would have been unlikely or impossible 3 or 4 months ago when only 1900 Mhz 1xRTT was available.

 

(Thanks to SignalCheck Pro for watching the connection for me!)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night at my home in Cottage Grove, WI (near Madison), I noticed LTE pop up on my phone.  It was off and on (probably doing some testing), but it was definitely there.  Signal was between -110 and -116, so I wasn't super close to the tower.  I was able to obtain this tower information: 

 

MCC - 310

MNC - 120

Cell 191 Band 25

UL Ch: 26665 DL Ch: 8665

 

My location in Cottage Grove was just off the interstate by the Kwik Trip gas station on Hwy N.  My speeds were only around 3 Mbit/sec download and 2 Mbit/sec upload, but I imagine that will change if they have backhaul work to do yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm out in San Francisco now and there's LTE everywhere! But the speeds are not great. Hoping to see Wisconsin improvements when I return!

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night at my home in Cottage Grove, WI (near Madison), I noticed LTE pop up on my phone.  It was off and on (probably doing some testing), but it was definitely there.  Signal was between -110 and -116, so I wasn't super close to the tower.  I was able to obtain this tower information: 

 

MCC - 310

MNC - 120

Cell 191 Band 25

UL Ch: 26665 DL Ch: 8665

 

My location in Cottage Grove was just off the interstate by the Kwik Trip gas station on Hwy N.  My speeds were only around 3 Mbit/sec download and 2 Mbit/sec upload, but I imagine that will change if they have backhaul work to do yet.

That portion was already marked on Sensorly.  I believe the tower is on the North side of I-94.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speeds in San Francisco are widely variable. You can see that my LTE signal is -108 and I am indoors. However, data is actual usable, which differs from Sprint's 3G. I have done outdoor tests and it's not really any better.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

uploadfromtaptalk1371217660307.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That portion was already marked on Sensorly.  I believe the tower is on the North side of I-94.

It could be the same tower, but what I'm seeing on Sensorly is over by I-94 and Highway 73.  I'm seeing -90 db when I walk around outside where Hwy N and I-94 are (that's a pretty good signal from that distance).  I did a drive-around in my area with Sensorly's "Map Trip", but I still don't see the data on the map.  I've always had problems with Sensorly posting my data (not sure what the problem is).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the early development down in Chicago like we are in. The network was unstable as far as speed and kept switching between 3G and 4G LTE. I was down there a month ago and everything as drastically improved. The network doesn't keep switching between 3G and 4G LTE. The speeds are consistent now as well. I'm sure there will be a bumpy ride at first but it will get better in Milwaukee and Madison as they fine tune everything for the location of the towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm traveling across the country, we left from ohare... I'm gonna say.. Absolutely amazing LTE and speed. Would have run speed tests but I was in the airport. Vancouver, BC on the other hand... 0 service at all on my iPhone. Does anyone know how service in Alaska is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Skokie in Northbrook, Illinois LTE definitely faster, but not amazing.  Sensory has it light purple but phone was struggling to make it to 5MB.  Is this what we have to look forward to once Milwaukee is complete?  Lacklusture?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A tower got marked 4g complete on Sherman Blvd and Silver Spring near or in Glendale! I'm gonna go drive past that sucker tonight and rejoice, I mean, see if it really is broadcasting LTE.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Sheboygan part of Milwaukee market or the Northern Wisconsin market?

 

Sheboygan is part of the North Wisconsin market. It's pretty much on the boarder of the North Wisconsin and Milwaukee market border line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any speed tests from that tower? Curious if it was a test run or if they're actively broadcasting.

Any other updates? It got kinda quiet.

 

 

 

http://postimg.org/image/ybc7jzycr/

 

 

When I first showed up to the tower, I couldn't get any LTE signal. I was running the LTE discovery app so it was cycling airplane mode on and off. I did that for about 15 min. Then I drove around the site to the north of it, then all of the sudden I grabbed an LTE signal. It was from that tower because in signal check pro, the LTE signal was very strong. Then I ran a bunch of speed test as I drove around the blocks near there mapping it on sensorly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My co-workers were getting 20 down and about 6-8 up on GS3's. On my Torque I was getting 25 down and same uploads.

 

 

Yea, I had some real good speeds in there, but it seemed to vary pretty widely from test to test as you can see from my screen shot. Given, I was driving around (slowly) while I was taking those tests... It's still very early in the rollout in this area though, so I'm sure it will get even better as more towers around it come online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...