Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jreuschl said:

I must have missed it.  What does T-Mobile plan on doing with B26?

Very occasionally I used the Band Selection app to force B26 in an area that T-Mobile hasn't upgraded a tower.  Obviously with the shut down that is probably not going to work anymore.

B26 will be sold to Dish as part of the merger deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jreuschl said:

I must have missed it.  What does T-Mobile plan on doing with B26?

Very occasionally I used the Band Selection app to force B26 in an area that T-Mobile hasn't upgraded a tower.  Obviously with the shut down that is probably not going to work anymore.

I believe one of the merger conditions was they had offer to sell it to Dish. 

EDIT: Oops didn't see that this had already been answered. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

I believe one of the merger conditions was they had offer to sell it to Dish. 

EDIT: Oops didn't see that this had already been answered. 

Actually, you are correct. It is possible Dish won't take it. Meanwhile both Dish and T-Mobile pretend they don't want it for negotiation purposes.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Known non-keep powerline site site near a powerful T-Mobile site in NW Columbus OH still operating on band 25 today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BucketHead25 said:

Not the greatest article... yeah Sprint was a little late to LTE but they're unnecessarily rough. In most cities it was at least competitive with the other carriers, if not better in some cases by the time the B41 rollout reached its peak.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dkoellerwx said:

Not the greatest article... yeah Sprint was a little late to LTE but they're unnecessarily rough. In most cities it was at least competitive with the other carriers, if not better in some cases by the time the B41 rollout reached its peak.

Agreed.  I happily relied on Sprint LTE Hotspot for several years for all of my internet needs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2022 at 4:26 PM, dkyeager said:

Actually, you are correct. It is possible Dish won't take it. Meanwhile both Dish and T-Mobile pretend they don't want it for negotiation purposes.

It's a small channel size and it's just yet another frequency they have to support. They should just sell it to AT&T/Verizon/USCC and be done with it. 

Or sell it to the government and have it incorporate it in the 700/800 Public Service frequencies.

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

It's a small channel size and it's just yet another frequency they have to support. They should just sell it to AT&T/Verizon/USCC and be done with it. 

Or sell it to the government and have it incorporate it in the 700/800 Public Service frequencies.

The FCC should consider ways to consolidate many bands into larger bandwith channels.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

It's a small channel size and it's just yet another frequency they have to support. They should just sell it to AT&T/Verizon/USCC and be done with it. 

Or sell it to the government and have it incorporate it in the 700/800 Public Service frequencies.

Dish has base stations and antennas already set up for n26, and phones are starting to come out supporting that. Yes, it's a 5x5 patchwork, but it can basically provide an anchor for higher-frequency NR that augments n71, which in many places is only 5x5 on Dish.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, S4GRU said:

Sprint still alive on all 3 bands here in the South Puget Sound area this morning.

Robert

Just cycled through where I'm sitting...not near any keep sites...and 25/26 don't exist...locking to them but.ps me over to AT&T MFBI (why TMo isn't doing 2/25 MFBI here I don't know...maybe Nokia equipment can't do it?). TMo B41 is visible, but Sprint isn't.

Two nights ago I saw 10 MHz Sprint B41 at the top of the band. Not sure whether that's live today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile is asking FCC for approval to obtain Watch TV 2.5 spectrum in Ohio to meet its 5G rural merger obligations in 29 Ohio and 2 Indiana counties. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=1979344942&attachmentKey=21484155&attachmentInd=applAttach

This implies that T-Mobile will aggressively go after 2.5 rural spectrum in the upcoming FCC auction 108 even more than I thought.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B25 no longer visible to my G2s with Sprint Sims except when rooted using NSG.  These were last used on MVNO Tello.  My LG G4 which was last used on Sprint with a Sprint Sim is unregistered on Verizon 3g.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigsnake49 said:

Is T-Mobile still trying to swap band 2/25 allocations to create larger adjacent blocks to band 25? 

Here they canibalized all of but the PCS G-block for B2 but they already had everything contiguous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

Is T-Mobile still trying to swap band 2/25 allocations to create larger adjacent blocks to band 25? 

I believe they have made a few attempts, but I don't think there has been a large scale effort so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cycled through here and there's a Sprint Keep Site within range with 25+26+41. 25 is still 10x10, while 41 is the same 10 MHz at the top of the band that I saw at the airport on Friday night. Speeds aren't great, but signal isn't bad, so my guess is that they turned up the power on the site vs. where it was before (B26 is -101 RSRP and I know the site nearest me is gone).

Will be downtown for fireworks tonight, so will see how networks perform. I have mmW-enabled VZW and AT&T SIMs to play with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several T-Mobile upgrade sites in my area came online last week. Interestingly, every single one used a single eNB for all LTE bands including B41. This is extremely unusual for my area and, from my understanding, most areas. Typically, B41 and the second B2 carrier will be on a different eNB than B2(first carrier)/B12/B66/B71. I've never understood the logic T-Mo has used for splitting eNBs but here's hoping it leads to them consolidating a number of the existing sites under single eNBs rather than creating even more chaos.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2022 at 1:05 PM, BucketHead25 said:

I guess this news means that all of the Sprint DAS installations are now offline as well? Can T-Mobile assume ownership of these installed systems and retool them for T-Mobile network access?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Several T-Mobile upgrade sites in my area came online last week. Interestingly, every single one used a single eNB for all LTE bands including B41. This is extremely unusual for my area and, from my understanding, most areas. Typically, B41 and the second B2 carrier will be on a different eNB than B2(first carrier)/B12/B66/B71. I've never understood the logic T-Mo has used for splitting eNBs but here's hoping it leads to them consolidating a number of the existing sites under single eNBs rather than creating even more chaos.

I've always hated the split eNBs. They make it that much harder to track upgrades of sites and more importantly it also makes it slightly worse for carrier aggregation. While T-Mobile has enabled the ability to aggregate bands across eNBs, it seems like the network avoids doing that as much as possible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

I've always hated the split eNBs. They make it that much harder to track upgrades of sites and more importantly it also makes it slightly worse for carrier aggregation. While T-Mobile has enabled the ability to aggregate bands across eNBs, it seems like the network avoids doing that as much as possible.

Agreed on the split eNBs being a pain. AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile all do it around here, I've always wondered what the technical reasoning was for it. AT&T and Verizon's follow a pattern at least which helps. Still better than the 5 eNBs Sprint sites had around here. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around here, the GCIs are a complete mess, with some sites having 5 or more.  I do hope they come back and tidy them; I know that some of the newer upgraded sites are not getting separate 600/700 GCIs like previous ones were. 

I'd be nice if they tidied the PCIs also, as they seem to be completely random and have no consistency across bands (or sometimes even within bands).

- Trip

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...