Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

On 5/9/2020 at 7:43 PM, 1dante said:

That definitely makes sense. I hope they are upgrading the area. 

I was there last week by the college and all of downtown. No 5G at all. Meanwhile in Ocala they have turned on five 5G towers already.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Terrell352 said:

I was there last week by the college and all of downtown. No 5G at all. Meanwhile in Ocala they have turned on five 5G towers already.

That’s good to know. Im sure they’ll make their way up soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint consumer brand headed for summer sunset

Quote

On the consumer side, “we’ve always been planning a summer timeframe,” Sievert said. “With COVID-19, we moved it out into the mid-summer instead of the early summer, and this is when we will essentially be advertising one flagship postpaid T-Mobile brand as well as operating a unified fleet of retail. The retail piece is why we slowed down just a little bit.”

T-Mobile hasn’t talked about an exact date – although some reports have pegged it as August 2 – but that’s when the company will present a unified value proposition behind the flagship postpaid T-Mobile brand. That value proposition will be activated by a fully trained, “fired-up team of people across all of our retail fleet, which will be branded T-Mobile,” Sievert said.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile lays out $60B, five-year buildout plan for 5G

Great background. The sheer amount of Capex here is impressive. I got so used to seeing drips and dribbles from Sprint over the years. It was really sad.

Some more background here: There's no slowdown in sight for T-Mobile's industry-leading 5G expansion efforts

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RedSpark said:

T-Mobile lays out $60B, five-year buildout plan for 5G

Great background. The sheer amount of Capex here is impressive. I got so used to seeing drips and dribbles from Sprint over the years. It was really sad.

Some more background here: There's no slowdown in sight for T-Mobile's industry-leading 5G expansion efforts

I’m excited. This merger was needed for Sprint

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m excited. This merger was needed for Sprint
60 Bil is great but that equals to 12 bill per year and vzw and att will spend 40 bill more, so if TMO wants to get there they need to spend more than that

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

60 Bil is great but that equals to 12 bill per year and vzw and att will spend 40 bill more, so if TMO wants to get there they need to spend more than that

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk


Does that 40 Bill more include spectrum auctions for acquiring mid band spectrum that both VZW & AT&T severely lack? The synergies that Sprint & T-Mobile have, they should be able to get away with 12 Bill a year while steadily rolling out MMWave. Plus we do not know if Dish will buy some 600 MHz or how long they will pay to utilize the New T-Mobile network. [emoji2375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that 40 Bill more include spectrum auctions for acquiring mid band spectrum that both VZW & AT&T severely lack? The synergies that Sprint & T-Mobile have, they should be able to get away with 12 Bill a year while steadily rolling out MMWave. Plus we do not know if Dish will buy some 600 MHz or how long they will pay to utilize the New T-Mobile network. [emoji2375]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dish already owns 600 and doesn't have to pay to use the TMO network for the first 7 years and that 100 million for att and vzw will be just network,vzw needs it way more than att. Att will only buy CBRS in limited areas and could go after Cband but vzw will buy the most

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dish certainly has to pay T-Mobile for being an MVNO.
Not for the first 7 years that's a stipulation to get the merger to pass. TMO didn't have to pay att when that merger failed for the first 7 years.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Not for the first 7 years that's a stipulation to get the merger to pass. TMO didn't have to pay att when that merger failed for the first 7 years.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

I thought it was just giving dish a certain, very good price for the first seven years. Not free use.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Not for the first 7 years that's a stipulation to get the merger to pass. TMO didn't have to pay att when that merger failed for the first 7 years.

Where is that coming from? It isn't accurate... And the T-Mobile AT&T situation isn't really analogous here at all.

56 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Dish certainly has to pay T-Mobile for being an MVNO.

 

20 minutes ago, Cardsfan96 said:

I thought it was just giving dish a certain, very good price for the first seven years. Not free use.

Correct. They're basically getting the best MVNO deal in the history of U.S. wireless, paying very favorable wholesale rates, but they're still paying.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, RedSpark said:

T-Mobile lays out $60B, five-year buildout plan for 5G

Great background. The sheer amount of Capex here is impressive. I got so used to seeing drips and dribbles from Sprint over the years. It was really sad.

Some more background here: There's no slowdown in sight for T-Mobile's industry-leading 5G expansion efforts

At least it isn't a cut.  That's roughly $12B a year.  Sprint and TMobile combined where already at this level.  Just getting shuffled around now to new priorities.  It's kinda unfortunate cause Sprint almost finished their Tri-Band build out and now we have to sit through it yet again with TMobile.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, red_dog007 said:

At least it isn't a cut.  That's roughly $12B a year.  Sprint and TMobile combined where already at this level.  Just getting shuffled around now to new priorities.  It's kinda unfortunate cause Sprint almost finished their Tri-Band build out and now we have to sit through it yet again with TMobile.

Difference is that T-Mobile under-promises and over-delivers. That's something we're not used to having with Sprint.

Sprint's Triband build-out was still not dense or expansive enough to be competitive.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Difference is that T-Mobile under-promises and over-delivers.

I don't know about.  From what I have seen

2G->LTE was cheap. Strictly just enough to enable LTE

New LTE coverage being just a single band, in a lot of cases just PCS or AWS

700 being just sprinkled around. Its a lot better now, but taken a long time to get to where it is now, but in many cases still very much so lacking due to lack of deployment. Especially new coverage that lacks it.

600 very much a sprinkle but the map makes you think they are done with it in a given area with it.

Reguardless of how fast it takes, still gotta sit through another full buildout of 2.5GHz. 😕 65k towers, gotta average 1800 sites a month for 3yrs to get a full 2.5GHz buildout on TMobile sites.  However, with how the currently build out, I wouldn't expect them to do a full build out of it. I can see a lot of low band sites not getting midband at all still and midband only sites getting added just 600MHz. 

Then at levels smaller than macro, will TMobile be able to just import those sites into their core or do they gotta do another build out there? Aug 2019 Sprint reported 32k small cells which is actually way more than TMobile's listed 25k small cells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

I don't know about.  From what I have seen

2G->LTE was cheap. Strictly just enough to enable LTE

New LTE coverage being just a single band, in a lot of cases just PCS or AWS

700 being just sprinkled around. Its a lot better now, but taken a long time to get to where it is now, but in many cases still very much so lacking due to lack of deployment. Especially new coverage that lacks it.

600 very much a sprinkle but the map makes you think they are done with it in a given area with it.

Reguardless of how fast it takes, still gotta sit through another full buildout of 2.5GHz. 😕 65k towers, gotta average 1800 sites a month for 3yrs to get a full 2.5GHz buildout on TMobile sites.  However, with how the currently build out, I wouldn't expect them to do a full build out of it. I can see a lot of low band sites not getting midband at all still and midband only sites getting added just 600MHz. 

Then at levels smaller than macro, will TMobile be able to just import those sites into their core or do they gotta do another build out there? Aug 2019 Sprint reported 32k small cells which is actually way more than TMobile's listed 25k small cells.

I dont think this build out will take that long since they already have the permits and backhaul

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like we have been waiting for eternity to have a network experience similar to the duopoly but I got faith New T-Mobile will take advantage of this opportunity and keep the momentum going for the next three years. COVID-19 was supposed to slow down the buildout but with vehicle traffic cut in half in the big metros, I would not be surprised if their timeline continues to speed up until the quarantine is lifted. Just think of all the work every states DOT has been able to get done on the highways in the past two months. From a logistical stand point, New T-Mobile should have the ability to demo and ship new tower equipment at a faster pace.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Bennyjet29.         

I think the "know-it-all" arm-chair would-be COO's on some of the forums and Youtubers need to quit lamenting  over "only $60Billion on Capex."      it's been 6 weeks and some are already predicting whether this was a good or bad network merger.       I'm interested in seeing where the network stands come September or October.   I really think we have good things coming for a change...   It just needs a little time.  

I also heard on one of T-Mobile's calls this week with C Moffett, that T-Mobile admits they will definitely be competing in the upcoming spectrum auctions.   This is way more than we came to expect from Sprint.      

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Bennyjet29.         
I think the "know-it-all" arm-chair would-be COO's on some of the forums and Youtubers need to quit lamenting  over "only $60Billion on Capex."      it's been 6 weeks and some are already predicting whether this was a good or bad network merger.       I'm interested in seeing where the network stands come September or October.   I really think we have good things coming for a change...   It just needs a little time.  
I also heard on one of T-Mobile's calls this week with C Moffett, that T-Mobile admits they will definitely be competing in the upcoming spectrum auctions.   This is way more than we came to expect from Sprint.      

The iPhone 12 launch will be the ultimate barometer/stress test for the New T-Mobile network. I love my iPhone 11 Pro Max but got a feeling I will be tempted to pay some $$$ for an early upgrade to the iPhone 12 Pro Max as I just upgraded in February. Hence, I understand the urgency to first finish network overhauls in the metro areas as those will have the most 5G upgrades and usage. Bottom line, we have “hope” again of a compatible network that should rival the duopoly, which is still hard for me to fathom! [emoji1430]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this over on the T-Mobile Reddit...

“I was able to speak to the tower crew.  This site has been planned for nearly a year now.   They’re just doing 700/AWS for now and will be adding 600/n41 at some point in the near future.   They’ve been upgrading sites in northern NJ and Central NJ with band 41 for the last several weeks.  I was told expect an aggressive buildout.”

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dewbertdc said:

They’re just doing 700/AWS for now and will be adding 600/n41 at some point in the near future.

Seriously?  Seems like a waste of effort and resources to have to come back and upgrade the site again right after building it.

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?  Seems like a waste of effort and resources to have to come back and upgrade the site again right after building it.
- Trip
All they have to do is add the B71 and B41 antennas that's about it

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Trip said:

Seriously?  Seems like a waste of effort and resources to have to come back and upgrade the site again right after building it.

- Trip

It sure does, which makes me think they're having trouble keeping enough stock of B71/B41 equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dewbertdc said:

It sure does, which makes me think they're having trouble keeping enough stock of B71/B41 equipment.

It is early. Some of this could also be contractual with tower hands.  Also note that T-Mobile has a far less monolithic approach to sites than Sprint. Many sites only have two bands. (I use NSG and sit near the sites and go though each band.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...