Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy S8 & Dual Sim/Duos


Andrew Revering

Recommended Posts

Okay so after 9 days of experience I can say this. HPUE might be legit or the radio on this phone is really good but....only on b41 only mode. With only the b41 radio I am getting it in places my Note 5 and GS7 can not in b41 only mode and usuable at that. Just a example at the park I go to I can't get b41 on the other phones with b41 mode active but on the S8+ I'm on b41 with speeds between 8-30 and sometimes even 50mbps. A radio update can make this phone prefer b41 more and then it can possibly be crowned the LTE Plus champ!

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My S8+ is holding onto weak Band 26 inside a building where my Nexus 6 would have no signal/roam. I don't know if it's due to recent site optimization or a generally better radio inside the phone but I'm really impressed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay so after 9 days of experience I can say this. HPUE might be legit or the radio on this phone is really good but....only on b41 only mode. With only the b41 radio I am getting it in places my Note 5 and GS7 can not in b41 only mode and usuable at that. Just a example at the park I go to I can't get b41 on the other phones with b41 mode active but on the S8+ I'm on b41 with speeds between 8-30 and sometimes even 50mbps. A radio update can make this phone prefer b41 more and then it can possibly be crowned the LTE Plus champ!

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Hopefully the extra B41 LTE range from the benefit of HPUE is as advertised where it is about 90% of B25 LTE range.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those seeing any sort of lag like I was, try not using Swiftkey keyboard. Gboard is behaving a lot better overall. No lag in recents key, etc.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have problems with Gboard not responding after leaving the keyboard open and letting the phone sleep then waking up the phone? I can only type after clicking out of keyboard and clicking the text field to bring the keyboard back.

 

I've tried uninstalling and using the Samsung keyboard and it doesn't do it to the Samsung keyboard.

 

I also got notification that my Gear VR shipped!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have problems with Gboard not responding after leaving the keyboard open and letting the phone sleep then waking up the phone? I can only type after clicking out of keyboard and clicking the text field to bring the keyboard back.

 

I've tried uninstalling and using the Samsung keyboard and it doesn't do it to the Samsung keyboard.

 

I also got notification that my Gear VR shipped!

That was happening to me for a long while, and that is why I no longer use gboard, back to the Samsung keyboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was happening to me for a long while, and that is why I no longer use gboard, back to the Samsung keyboard.

I thought it was the beta version at first, but nope. I don't have that issue on my S7 Edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have problems with Gboard not responding after leaving the keyboard open and letting the phone sleep then waking up the phone? I can only type after clicking out of keyboard and clicking the text field to bring the keyboard back.

 

I've tried uninstalling and using the Samsung keyboard and it doesn't do it to the Samsung keyboard.

 

I also got notification that my Gear VR shipped!

Well shoot, haven't run into that yet. At least Gboard is behaving better than Swiftkey for me now. Still wish I could get the keyboard a little smaller than the smallest setting, but this screen is so tall it's okay.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see there is a report (1) of burn-in of the home button from the always on display. The interwebs are taking this and running with it, even if this 1 dutch report isn't even real... regardless I have to ask -- AOD is not new. Did the S7 ever have burn-in issues with its always on display? If S7 and other AMOLED phones didn't have issues, I don't know why people would worry so much about this one. I feel like some of these sites are just grabbing at straws to find problems when there really are none.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see there is a report (1) of burn-in of the home button from the always on display. The interwebs are taking this and running with it, even if this 1 dutch report isn't even real... regardless I have to ask -- AOD is not new. Did the S7 ever have burn-in issues with its always on display? If S7 and other AMOLED phones didn't have issues, I don't know why people would worry so much about this one. I feel like some of these sites are just grabbing at straws to find problems when there really are none.

Hi Andrew,

 

I'm not sure about if the newer AMOLED-equipped smartphones have any issues with burn-in or not. However, I went to a Best Buy last year during the late summer, I believe it was, and there were several AMOLED smartphones on display which had severe burn-in. It even gave me the idea to create a poll in the General Topics section asking for opinions between AMOLED and LCD.

 

Back then, I voted for LCD. I don't have a problem with OLED, and I actually prefer the imaging of OLED better than LCD, so long as its either based on RGB or on LG's white subpixels with RGB color filters. I very much dislike Samsung's use of Pentile and its Diamond Pixel counterpart variety. I don't like the warmish tint it produces. To me, its like having an annoying, headache-inducing, overwhelming amount of bass that colors the midrange audio with a boomy thickness to the sound.

 

Until Samsung goes back to using the much better Super AMOLED Plus displays, which feature the lovely true-to-life saturated colors based off of actual RGB subpixels, rather than hideous blobs of green diamond-shaped trixels all over the place, LCD is my preferred display of choice in smartphones.

 

Of course, televisions are a bit different, since OLED doesn't use Pentile in any form. So, I prefer the imaging and overall technological structure with its benefits in contrast with LED LCD. However, there is an issue of image retention with OLED, which if worsened over time, increases the risk of burn-in. Yet, the 2017 models are reportedly quite a bit less likely to have image retention, which even if it does happen, it shouldn't be as pronounced, nor last quite as long.

 

Again though, I'm not sure about Samsung's particular smartphone OLED technology updates for this year. Considering how bad things looked last year, they'd have to do alot to make it better from last

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally found a spot where I can really test HPUE indoors. Site has B25/B25-2ndC/B26/B41-3xCA 

 

I will test one band at a time disabling the other 2 bands to see just how close B41 with HPUE is to B25

 

Will test all bands vs each other in terms of speed/stability and to see how the distance affects overall performance.

 

I'll hopefully have some results by tomorrow evening.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally found a spot where I can really test HPUE indoors. Site has B25/B25-2ndC/B26/B41-3xCA

 

I will test one band at a time disabling the other 2 bands to see just how close B41 with HPUE is to B25

 

Will test all bands vs each other in terms of speed/stability and to see how the distance affects overall performance.

 

I'll hopefully have some results by tomorrow evening.

You can test all you want, but the user experience will come down to where Sprint decides to set the B41 RSRP signal threshold for HPUE handsets.

 

Current non-HPUe devices drop B42 at -117 RSRP. For HPUE devices, it should be slightly lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can test all you want, but the user experience will come down to where Sprint decides to set the B41 RSRP signal threshold for HPUE handsets.

 

Current non-HPUe devices drop B42 at -117 RSRP. For HPUE devices, it should be slightly lower.

On a galaxy s-7, I can occasionally hold onto a 117 signal on band 41 but only in a idle condition. If I try to actually use the data, I will drop to band 25 or maybe band 26.  At -115, I sometimes can hold on to an active data session, but it will be super slow and probably move to band 25 or 26. I do not have an S-8 to test, but I would hope that you would be able to hold and use the data connection at -115 or worse and actually have some decent speed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can test all you want, but the user experience will come down to where Sprint decides to set the B41 RSRP signal threshold for HPUE handsets.

Current non-HPUe devices drop B42 at -117 RSRP. For HPUE devices, it should be slightly lower.

From what I have seen in testing -122 seems to be the ceiling. But I found a site that has almost no traffic after 11pm and has every piece of tech Sprint has put out. At -72 I hit about 200mbs around midnight.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I assume that any agreement is not perpetual and has an end date. - Trip
    • I think it is likely that T-Mobile will be forced to honor any existing US cellular roaming agreements in those areas as a condition of them taking over the spectrum.  In that case, there would be no improvement of service unless T-Mobile improves the service offering in those areas.
    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. However this depends on how it is structured. Use of a different plmn for satellite service might make it possible for planes only to connect with satellite. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...