Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

https://np.reddit.com/r/verizon/comments/5to84t/introducing_verizon_unlimited/

 

Multi plan $100. $20 for each smartphone. My cousin doesn't have full details so cannot confirm. Waiting on more nfo tomorrow.

I edited my post above to contain the link from Verizon that was posted earlier. It would be beyond surprising if VZW would be willing to destroy it's margins to gain market share at this point.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like we're all traitors lol. I'm sure Marcelo is looking at these comments like

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/5f/56/7b/5f567b0a162453399f8af1cb564f8139.gif

But in all seriousness, I'm curious to see how Masa will respond. Sprint's network plans sound promising (on paper) this year but we all know how they are when it comes to execution.

As far as I can tell, Marcelo doesn't seem to appreciate that he's comparing Sprint's promotional pricing, which is only available to new customers.

 

With Verizon's new Unlimited plan, it's as important to keep current customers as it is to get new ones... I hoping he'll pay attention to that.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I can tell, Marcelo doesn't seem to appreciate that he's comparing Sprint's promotional pricing, which is only available to new customers.

 

With Verizon's new Unlimited plan, it's as important to keep current customers as it is to get new ones... I hoping he'll pay attention to that.

The general doesn't know which battle he is fighting on the battlefield.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see this competition. Sprint is still in an excellent spectrum position.

 

However, Marcelo needs to have SoftBank start kicking in major funding for CapEx to accelerate network deployment. This is going to be an interesting few weeks to see what Sprint does.

I completely agree that Marcelo needs to do this, but I believe he's already tried. He still needs to try more, at least in the interim, knowing Masayoshi Son wants to spare too much money on Sprint right now, due to possible planning for a T-Mobile merger.

 

Yet, if Sprint were to spend on network development, as I believe they should, that would put them in a much better position, especially considering Sprint's superior spectrum position. Sprint ought to do everything they can to get band 41 deployed on all towers currently at least that, then decide whether to spend on new towers or not dependant on its status regarding T-Mobile merger possibilities.

 

I'd like Sprint to at least announce an intent on a merger with T-Mobile, despite that I agree with those here wanting Sprint not to focus on a merger, because an attempt I believe will get AT&T to try again for T-Mobile, which if happens, Sprint should back off and work on network deployment. They could easily be the best with the spectrum they have, if only located on all existing towers, then plan to develop more.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon just set it off. So much for Sprint's 12 month $90 tease.

 

Network strain? Bring it on. Verizon will have another justification for a mega merger or buyout which nets spectrum.

Spot On!

 

I think this will happen, the first possibly with Dish. I think this is a great move on Verizon's part bringing back unlimited data, but they may run into a spectrum crunch soon enough with success in this plan. Dish would give them the extra spectrum they need, which in building more competition to AT&T hopefully will produce the results I believe will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I edited my post above to contain the link from Verizon that was posted earlier. It would be beyond surprising if VZW would be willing to destroy it's margins to gain market share at this point.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pricing most likely confirmed. Was able to add 5 lines in cart for $200 with auto pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I switch I would save $40 with the free phone deal with trade in all while gaining more coverage and much faster speeds in way more places. Plus volte support and 10 gigs hotspot. Thank you Sprint and T-Mobile for making this happen. If the S8 was out I would be all over this.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just shocked that they included the 10GB of mobile hotspot. The pricing is really good. I really do not know how Sprint can compete. This is a major shock to the system. Love them or hate them, you cannot say Verizon does not have the best network in the country. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But on a realistic note, what people forget is that this plan goes directly against T-Mobile's unlimited data plan, rather than Sprint. I hate to say it but in most urban markets it's usually T-Mobile vs. Verizon, and Sprint & AT&T picking up the rest. This will stem the tide of Verizon defectors, and also entice some folks to come back. 

 

As for me personally, I carry a Verizon phone as well as my Sprint phone for work, and travel the country on business travel. Very rarely do I run into a place where my Sprint phone doesn't work as well, so it's not worth the expense to switch.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much for Sprint spending $200 Million on TIDAL.... should have put that into CapEx or paid off debt with it. The move looks pretty ill-timed with this development.

 

Verizon's move here is really serious, and I'm not sure Marcelo realizes it... or if he has, he hasn't said anything yet.

 

So far, he's retweeted someone else who called the Verizon CEO "a snoozer": https://twitter.com/sprintsback/status/830967531691139072

 

Sprint's at the $60/month price point for one line because it has mobile optimized video. Add in the $20/month upgrade for HD Streaming and you hit $80/month.... which is Verizon's Price Point for Unlimited with HD Video.

 

Combine that with Sprint offering 5GB of Tethering vs Verizon's 10GB and Sprint has some work to do to respond with a competitive offer.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But on a realistic note, what people forget is that this plan goes directly against T-Mobile's unlimited data plan, rather than Sprint. I hate to say it but in most urban markets it's usually T-Mobile vs. Verizon, and Sprint & AT&T picking up the rest. This will stem the tide of Verizon defectors, and also entice some folks to come back. 

 

As for me personally, I carry a Verizon phone as well as my Sprint phone for work, and travel the country on business travel. Very rarely do I run into a place where my Sprint phone doesn't work as well, so it's not worth the expense to switch.

It's important to compare the pricing for Verizon's Unlimited (with HD Streaming) to Sprint's Unlimited Freedom Premium (HD Streaming) pricing.

 

Verizon= Unlimited 4 lines is $180/month (with AutoPay). 10 GB of Hotspot per line.

 

Sprint= Unlimited Freedom Premium 4 lines is $240/month (with AutoPay). 5 GB of Hotspot per line.

 

Sprint= Unlimited Freedom 4 lines is $160/month (with AutoPay). 5 GB of Hotspot per line.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or be like me and stayed with the $70 unlimited plan with 3gb of tethering that doesn't have restrictions but gets prioritized when the network is congested which is a rarity.

 

Sent from my 2PYB2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much for Sprint spending $200 Million on TIDAL.... should have put that into CapEx or paid off debt with it. The move looks pretty ill-timed with this development.

 

Verizon's move here is really serious, and I'm not sure Marcelo realizes it... or if he has, he hasn't said anything yet.

 

So far, he's retweeted someone else who called the Verizon CEO "a snoozer": https://twitter.com/sprintsback/status/830967531691139072

 

Sprint's at the $60/month price point for one line because it has mobile optimized video. Add in the $20/month upgrade for HD Streaming and you hit $80/month.... which is Verizon's Price Point for Unlimited with HD Video.

 

Combine that with Sprint offering 5GB of Tethering vs Verizon's 10GB and Sprint has some work to do to respond with a competitive offer.

I did see some tweet by Marcelo but it was simply "corny" at best.

As I said before vzw could have timed the release differently and it probably would have crushed sprint/Tmo if this was tied in with the new samsung release as a promo.

 

Most people are stuck paying for phones and won't switch I do love the idea and hopefully sprint comes back with the "framily" pricing as that would be the equivalent @45 a line.

 

I can't wait to see how this turns out

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much for Sprint spending $200 Million on TIDAL.... should have put that into CapEx or paid off debt with it. The move looks pretty ill-timed with this development.

 

Verizon's move here is really serious, and I'm not sure Marcelo realizes it... or if he has, he hasn't said anything yet.

 

So far, he's retweeted someone else who called the Verizon CEO "a snoozer": https://twitter.com/sprintsback/status/830967531691139072

 

Sprint's at the $60/month price point for one line because it has mobile optimized video. Add in the $20/month upgrade for HD Streaming and you hit $80/month.... which is Verizon's Price Point for Unlimited with HD Video.

 

Combine that with Sprint offering 5GB of Tethering vs Verizon's 10GB and Sprint has some work to do to respond with a competitive offer.

Even the 5 line for $90 promo is not going to be good enough since after a year it goes up to $180. Verizon is 200 for 5 lines and HD streaming with no extra charge. Add in increased coverage, data speeds faster (in more places) VoLTE, the most small cells of any carrier, free phone with trade in, 10 gb hotspot and unlimited 3g after. My god I dont know what to do. I wonder how long Verizon plans to keep unlimited around and how much damage its going to do to the network? I will say this again Sprint spending less than 20% on network capex compared to Verizon is not doing them any favors. They say surgical network deployment but there are so many towers in need of capacity upgrades this method is going to take forever.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even the 5 line for $90 promo is not going to be good enough since after a year it goes up to $180. Verizon is 200 for 5 lines and HD streaming with no extra charge. Add in increased coverage, data speeds faster (in more places) VoLTE, the most small cells of any carrier, free phone with trade in, 10 gb hotspot and unlimited 3g after. My god I dont know what to do. I wonder how long Verizon plans to keep unlimited around and how much damage its going to do to the network? I will say this again Sprint spending less than 20% on network capex compared to Verizon is not doing them any favors. They say surgical network deployment but there are so many towers in need of capacity upgrades this method is going to take forever.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Sprint needs to adjust its pricing and offering to match Verizon on hotspot and remove the 480p cap, put it at 720p for HD and still can keep the price at 60 for the first line, 40 for the second line etc.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...