Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Users Thread!


nexgencpu

Recommended Posts

You are selling it???  The HTC One is probably the pinnacle of Android handset design, maybe even of all handset design for the foreseeable future.  Mine will be "parked in the garage" soon, but it is going nowhere.  It is a museum piece.

 

AJ

 

Wow. I never heard AJ talk anything up this much before! I must not be reading enough of his posts lol. Damn it is a great phone, but I am tight on cash and ordered a nexus 5. I went back to my rooted evolte  :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are selling it??? The HTC One is probably the pinnacle of Android handset design, maybe even of all handset design for the foreseeable future. Mine will be "parked in the garage" soon, but it is going nowhere. It is a museum piece.

 

AJ

This got me thinking.. Wonder if I could bring more value to my Note2 by calling it the pinnacle of the digiblur ROM and PRL design developer version. Own the device the man himself developed on! One of a kind and priceless including a framed letter of authenticity. Buy it now! ;)

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my n5 (32GB) activated today, I noticed that the PCS signal is slightly stronger at work.

 

Tried to activate it online, accepted all the phone/SIM numbers, but then told me to use the chat, worked no problem.

Rebooted and then updated the profile.

 

Of course, LTE is no more outside here now in Felony Way, WA, just the slow 3G [which might indicate 3G isn't converted over], hopefully that will change next year.

 

I can swap the AT&T and Sprint SIMs out, with no real problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaaargh

 

 

So, Google carries no more weight with Sprint? They used to be so cozy back when they began gvoice integration.  Maybe there was some fallout related to Clearwire investments/non-investments.  I know the Nexus is made by LG, but Nexus should equal Google (or maybe not)

My guess is they are releasing the less popular phones first to see how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So after digging around my assumption is there is a way to enable the DIAG mode through ADB...I have seen scripts which do this for AOSP ROMS however don't have the nuts to do try this...hopefully someone gives it a whirl...

perhaps a link to the scripts would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is they are releasing the less popular phones first to see how it goes.

If anything, they are releasing Spark to the more popular phones first:

http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/8/comScore_Reports_June_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share

 

Sure, the GS4 Mini, the Mega 6.3, and the HTC One Max are not really flagship devices, but I wouldn't be surprised if all three of those models individually outsold both the Nexus 5 and the G2 individually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be a hell of a performer. My G2 after messing around with some settings is besting my old GS3 now. It's hard to imagine an even better RF performer out there.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Messing with what settings i need to know my G2 is the same if not worse than my old gn2 at lte speeds and signal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything, they are releasing Spark to the more popular phones first:

http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/8/comScore_Reports_June_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share

 

Sure, the GS4 Mini, the Mega 6.3, and the HTC One Max are not really flagship devices, but I wouldn't be surprised if all three of those models individually outsold both the Nexus 5 and the G2 individually.

 

Well in terms of whether I consider these 3 devices to be flagships here: GS4 mini = no, Mega 6.3 = no, HTC One Max = yes!

 

I consider the HTC One Max to be a flagship phone.  A phone that has a Snapdragon 600 does not automatically disqualify it as being a non-flagship phone because the GS4 and HTC One are powered with the same SOC chip.  The HTC One Max was clearly marketed to the phablet fans that want that big screen but also have the HTC build quality and "touch" to it. 

 

The only reason why the HTC One Max is getting crapped on is because of the Snapdragon 600 chip (which by no means is a crappy processor), the lack of OIS in the camera (fair criticism) and lack of Beats Audio (HTC and Beat parted ways..not much you can do and most can't tell a huge difference between the two).  Had the HTC One Max just come installed with a Snapdragon 800 and possibly OIS in the camera, people would be praising this phone and calling it an instant flagship.  IMO it still holds the prestige of being a flagship model material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally got shipping notice!!!!

Me too @8pm central

 

Good thing I ordered the bugdroid case today . Nokia wireless charger later

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Edited by AMD64
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This got me thinking.. Wonder if I could bring more value to my Note2 by calling it the pinnacle of the digiblur ROM and PRL design developer version. Own the device the man himself developed on! One of a kind and priceless including a framed letter of authenticity. Buy it now! ;)

 

Seriously.. when the time comes, I am certainly going to get top dollar for *the* EVO LTE used to develop SignalCheck!  B)  Screw eBay, I'm going to Sotheby's with this...

 

-Mike

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally got shipping notice!!!!

Nice.  Unfortunately I'm still sitting at "ship by 11/22".  Here's hoping for tomorrow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We now have confirmation that the Nexus 5 is not slated to receive its Spark software update until early next year.  The Samsung and HTC handsets will receive their updates tomorrow.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4950-sprint-spark-official-name-for-the-tri-band-network-was-sprint-to-demo-its-25ghz-network-technology/?p=238747

 

AJ

 

How is this going to work exactly? Sprint will push the update to just nexus phones? Would this prevent you from receiving future updates from Google directly since this update will deviate you from stock? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone in the baton rouge area having LTE connection issues with their Nesux 5?  I just drove from downtown to bluebonnet running Sensorly and never picked up LTE, It showed 3G the whole way. Then when I got home it locked on to my Airave right away, which it never has done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...