Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

True. Roaming on 1x is horrible. Verizon 1x is slower than Sprint 1x from my personal observations. I am not sure if or when we will see LTE roaming, though. It seems it would either meet carrier stubbornness or a cost issue from carriers demanding a premium paid for access to their precious LTE network. Not sure if over time it will be common once LTE becomes more standard or if it does happen, if it would mean the beginning of paying for a premium roaming service add-on to your plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Nexus 4 has pretty crummy battery life. Worst battery life of any phone I've had since GS2.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

I suggest you update to the latest version of android.

 

MAJOR battery improvements.

 

I used to have to charge very often, could barely make it through the day (if at all).  Now I can breeze through 1-2 days.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think any LTE roaming agreements will be shown and billed as native. It is far more in the interest of smaller carriers to use Sprints network for nationwide coverage than for Sprint users to get better coverage. If anyone could gouge on pricing it would be Sprint but based on Hesse's comments about reducing roaming fees I suspect the goal is fair reciprocity.

 

Sent from my Galaxy using Tapatalk 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did Verizon do in the past that rubbed Google in the wrong way?

 

They don't really like complying with the open network part of what they agreed to when they bought C block spectrum.

Google pushed for this requirement before the sale when through.

 

(
B)
Use of devices and applications.

 Licensees offering service on spectrum subject to this section 
shall not deny, limit, or restrict the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice
 on the licensee’s C Block network, except:

(1) Insofar as such use would not be compliant with published technical standards reasonably necessary for the management or protection of the licensee’s network, or

(2) As required to comply with statute or applicable government regulation.
 

 

 

http://buzzmachine.com/2013/09/17/verizon-caught-red-handed/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't really like complying with the open network part of what they agreed to when they bought C block spectrum.

Google push for this requirement before the sale when through.

 

 

( B) Use of devices and applications. Licensees offering service on spectrum subject to this section shall not deny, limit, or restrict the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice on the licensee’s C Block network, except:

(1) Insofar as such use would not be compliant with published technical standards reasonably necessary for the management or protection of the licensee’s network, or

(2) As required to comply with statute or applicable government regulation.

 

 

http://buzzmachine.com/2013/09/17/verizon-caught-red-handed/

And, I'd imagine, that's just scratching the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

( B) Use of devices and applications. Licensees offering service on spectrum subject to this section shall not deny, limit, or restrict the...

 

When posted here, every FCC rule point B in the CFR is cool.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Nexus 5 is released on Sprint, what are the chances that going forward future devices will also be launched on Sprint? I don't want a redo of the Galaxy Nexus on Sprint and then Nexus 4 being absent. I think the HTC One is my last HTC handset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Nexus 5 is released on Sprint, what are the chances that going forward future devices will also be launched on Sprint? I don't want a redo of the Galaxy Nexus on Sprint and then Nexus 4 being absent. I think the HTC One is my last HTC handset. 

 

The Evo 4G LTE was my last HTC device. The LTE radio was garbage, and wouldn't pick up even when I stood underneath the tower. Traded it to some kid on craigslist for an older Galaxy Nexus, which I'm still using, and picks up LTE just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Evo 4G LTE was my last HTC device. The LTE radio was garbage, and wouldn't pick up even when I stood underneath the tower. Traded it to some kid on craigslist for an older Galaxy Nexus, which I'm still using, and picks up LTE just fine.

Did you ever compare the two side by side for actual signal strength?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Evo 4G LTE was my last HTC device. The LTE radio was garbage, and wouldn't pick up even when I stood underneath the tower. Traded it to some kid on craigslist for an older Galaxy Nexus, which I'm still using, and picks up LTE just fine.

 

Also , has anyone compared phones signal strengths side by side ie evo LTE, gs4, motox , lg2 etc?

 

That would be awesome.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you ever compare the two side by side for actual signal strength?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

Not side by side, but I wrote down the signal strength and location of 3G and LTE on my Evo, then when I traded for the Galaxy Nexus, I compared it to my notes. Blew the frickin' doors off the Evo! Just for an example, I took the bus and train 45 miles to trade for the Nexus, and on the Evo, I got LTE 0 times. On the way back with the Nexus, I got LTE over a dozen times. Stock rooted on both the Evo and the Nexus, not custom ROMs. 

 

Edit: Thought I should post a link relevant to the Nexus 5, being that's what this thread is for: http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2013/09/22/nexus-5-and-ubuntu-connection/

Edited by A30N
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not side by side, but I wrote down the signal strength and location of 3G and LTE on my Evo, then when I traded for the Galaxy Nexus, I compared it to my notes. Blew the frickin' doors off the Evo! Just for an example, I took the bus and train 45 miles to trade for the Nexus, and on the Evo, I got LTE 0 times. On the way back with the Nexus, I got LTE over a dozen times. Stock rooted on both the Evo and the Nexus, not custom ROMs. 

 

Edit: Thought I should post a link relevant to the Nexus 5, being that's what this thread is for: http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2013/09/22/nexus-5-and-ubuntu-connection/

That link was basically saying that because they're supposed to launch at the same time we think ubuntu might be on the Nexus 5. Also, I think what Canonical meant by being available on the nexus first was simply that it'll be much easier to put ubuntu on it, so that's where they're going to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That link was basically saying that because they're supposed to launch at the same time we think ubuntu might be on the Nexus 5. Also, I think what Canonical meant by being available on the nexus first was simply that it'll be much easier to put ubuntu on it, so that's where they're going to start.

 

Yeah, they had some experimental builds on the old Galaxy Nexus, but it was buggy as hell and all the apps were unfinished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they had some experimental builds on the old Galaxy Nexus, but it was buggy as hell and all the apps were unfinished.

Yeah, I remember that. One can only hope that since they tried to get all that money that they'll have a better plan this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any info on how this device performs RF wise in the FCC filing? And how that compares to other devices?

 

Anything is probably better than my EVO, but having a great performing RF device for once in my life would be great.

 

I remember there being a blog post here about how weak the EVO 4G LTE was RF wise. I bought it anyway, and while its a great phone otherwise, i hate its signal strength daily.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...