Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

Triband or not, I think I just scratched the Note3 off my list for 2013 and probably an upgrade altogether.  The Note 2 remains fantastic and meets my needs and Sprint's network offerings for the next 6 months.  

 

I'm sure its a fantastic device, but I would be more interested in getting my hands on a more finessed tri-band Galaxy S5 of whatever the next iteration becomes...  Its due time for a big overhaul more in line with the changes made between the first 3 generations.  The faux leather back is a sign that Samsung is finally willing to attend to the nanny complaints about housing (personally never cared, all galaxy devices have had better than average durability with drops and hardware reliability is stellar)... perhaps they will put out something with stunning, industrial-esque hardware next year. 

 

That being said, waiting with baited breath to read the full reviews on Sprint's Note3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Triband or not, I think I just scratched the Note3 off my list for 2013 and probably an upgrade altogether.  The Note 2 remains fantastic and meets my needs and Sprint's network offerings for the next 6 months.  

 

I'm sure its a fantastic device, but I would be more interested in getting my hands on a more finessed tri-band Galaxy S5 of whatever the next iteration becomes...  Its due time for a big overhaul more in line with the changes made between the first 3 generations.  The faux leather back is a sign that Samsung is finally willing to attend to the nanny complaints about housing (personally never cared, all galaxy devices have had better than average durability with drops and hardware reliability is stellar)... perhaps they will put out something with stunning, industrial-esque hardware next year. 

 

That being said, waiting with baited breath to read the full reviews on Sprint's Note3. 

 

U have an upgrade available or were you thinking about paying full retail for the Note 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U have an upgrade available or were you thinking about paying full retail for the Note 3?

 

One of my lines has an upgrade.  When I am ready, i'll flip the Note 2 and do the switcharoo.  That being said, I never let upgrade eligibility keep me from doing what I want ; ^_^

 

tumblr_m870gmbkrR1qzccmno1_500.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From ars;

 

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/09/hands-on-with-the-samsung-galaxy-note-iii-and-note-10-1/

 

The launch window is particularly impressive—Samsung is doing a worldwide launch of the Note III in 149 countries on September 25. Only the US and Japan are delayed until October.

 

To me, this pretty much seals that it will be tri-band, I suspect it will be a single sprint/softbank compatible device..

 

also, the tablet is indicated to support 800/2600 (but not 1900?);

 

 


NETWORK

LTE: LTE CAT4 800/850/900/1800/2100/2600
HSPA+ 42Mbps 850/900/1900/2100, HSUPA 5.76Mbps
3G: HSPA+ 21Mbps 850/900/1900/2100, HSUPA 5.76Mbps
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From ars;

 

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/09/hands-on-with-the-samsung-galaxy-note-iii-and-note-10-1/

 

 

To me, this pretty much seals that it will be tri-band, I suspect it will be a single sprint/softbank compatible device..

 

also, the tablet is indicated to support 800/2600 (but not 1900?);

 

Digiblur is right, it can't be the US version since 700 MHz is not supported.  The 2600 MHz LTE support in that article is for Japan since they have deployed LTE 2600 out in Japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From ars;

 

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/09/hands-on-with-the-samsung-galaxy-note-iii-and-note-10-1/

 

 

To me, this pretty much seals that it will be tri-band, I suspect it will be a single sprint/softbank compatible device..

 

also, the tablet is indicated to support 800/2600 (but not 1900?);

 

I had noticed that there was no 1900 LTE (but there was 800/2600) on the Tablet during the live video (I watched it for around 15 or so minutes this afternoon)... I just dismissed it as another market's tablet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had noticed that there was no 1900 LTE (but there was 800/2600) on the Tablet during the live video (I watched it for around 15 or so minutes this afternoon)... I just dismissed it as another market's tablet.

 

I wouldn't put much stock into the article, the information is clearly for the international version.  All it says in the specs for the US version is that the LTE bands supported will be market dependent and we know in the US that the case is also that it is wireless carrier dependent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear, You got catfished and you have to deal with a problematic member? You do not have my envy.

 

Yes, HawaiiD lured me in with his lyrical, poetic paragraphs.  I was practically hypnotized.  I think his real name might be Ronaiah or Lennay.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, HawaiiD lured me in with his lyrical, poetic paragraphs.  I was practically hypnotized.  I think his real name might be Ronaiah or Lennay.

 

AJ

I'm a little disappointed that you didn't pick up on the "problematic member" part of that but whatever.

 

HawaiiD is not for

you, you see

for he wants to go 

to France while you

just aren't a fan

of pants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little disappointed that you didn't pick up on the "problematic member" part of that but whatever.

 

Oh, I did catch that part, but I was not going to touch it, not even while wearing latex gloves.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not liking this trend of lacking Svxxx. It's like we are sliding back to the Vision days. On numerous occasions while out at a meeting on a conference call that I've gotten an email that has completely changed my day (reschedule meetings, emergency meetings, or something that needed my immediate attention etc). I might actually have to drop sprint after 11 years of service.

 

I'm also pretty surprised how many people are nonchalant about it. I'm sure there are people that rarely use call waiting or three way calling, but sprint wouldn't dare take those features away.

Edited by zeneker
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not liking this trend of lacking Svxxx. It's like we are sliding back to the Vision days. On numerous occasions while out at a meeting on a conference call that I've gotten an email that has completely changed my day (reschedule meetings, emergency meetings, or something that needed my immediate attention etc). I might actually have to drop sprint after 11 years of service.

 

I'm also pretty surprised how many people are nonchalant about it. I'm sure there are people that rarely use call waiting or three way calling, but sprint wouldn't dare take those features away.

Get a FreedomPop LTE broadband modem for when you absolutely need it. 500MB of data for free every month. It's worth the investment.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get a FreedomPop LTE broadband modem for when you absolutely need it. 500MB of data for free every month. It's worth the investment.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

It's not that I tether frequently (which I do tether my s3 in emergency situations.). It's while sitting on a phone call, that something as small in data as an email has been crucial. To me Svxx is just as important as call waiting to others. It's like sprint refuses to give me what I need. Finally I can get an flagship smartphone from sprint that is international ready, but I lose simultaneous voice and data. It's like I can't win and by winning I mean paying my hard earned money for.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that I tether frequently (which I do tether my s3 in emergency situations.). It's while sitting on a phone call, that something as small in data as an email has been crucial. To me Svxx is just as important as call waiting to others. It's like sprint refuses to give me what I need. Finally I can get an flagship smartphone from sprint that is international ready, but I lose simultaneous voice and data. It's like I can't win and by winning I mean paying my hard earned money for.

I understand where you are coming from. That's why I suggested the FreedomPop. Free data every month, or you can upgrade to higher data allotment, and it still runs on Sprint's network. Plus, the data devices pull a better signal than most phones do.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that I tether frequently (which I do tether my s3 in emergency situations.). It's while sitting on a phone call, that something as small in data as an email has been crucial. To me Svxx is just as important as call waiting to others. It's like sprint refuses to give me what I need. Finally I can get an flagship smartphone from sprint that is international ready, but I lose simultaneous voice and data. It's like I can't win and by winning I mean paying my hard earned money for.

 

You should try grooveip. Its an app in the playstore that does voice over IP with your google voice number. It works solid for me on LTE, even while driving! Maybe 2% of calls drop, but it also comes with an improvement in voice quality (from what I've observed.)  :tu: 

 

With Sprint you have the option to integrate your number with google voice, so this set up is quite nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty bummed about the Note 3 not having SVDO/SVLTE.  It's a deal killer for me since I don't have WiFi at work to fill the void.  I've gotten accustomed to it on my EVO and it sure is a nice change from the past devices lacking it.  I was going to pick one up on release day, but I think I'll wait for something else down the road.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1x data would still work while on calls, correct? Obviously that's unbearably slow in this day and age for most things, but that could be enough for email and other basic notifications until some OEM steps up to bring their engineers together to figure out how to bring back SVLTE. It's not as if VoLTE is just around the corner for Sprint. It's several years away yet, so this problem should not be brushed under the rug.

 

I've been considering picking up a MiFi 500 from FreedomPop myself, but to use one as a workaround for this new limitation (or rather, an old one brought back from the grave) is still a step backwards when the whole point of a smartphone is to combine multiple devices into one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1x data would still work while on calls, correct? Obviously that's unbearably slow in this day and age for most things, but that could be enough for email and other basic notifications until some OEM steps up to bring their engineers together to figure out how to bring back SVLTE. It's not as if VoLTE is just around the corner for Sprint. It's several years away yet, so this problem should not be brushed under the rug.

 

I've been considering picking up a MiFi 500 from FreedomPop myself, but to use one as a workaround for this new limitation (or rather, an old one brought back from the grave) is still a step backwards when the whole point of a smartphone is to combine multiple devices into one.

No, 1X data wouldn't work, there's only one path for all the celluar radios, meaning you can only use one at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've concluded that the Note III's FCC docs aren't out yet, right?  Why is everyone so solid that there's no SVDO/SVLTE?  Is it because the G2, which is using the same CPU doesn't have it?

Most people are choosing to believe what AJ said about price being a concern, also I'm personally taking the stance of until a Tri-band phone comes out with SVLTE I don't believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've concluded that the Note III's FCC docs aren't out yet, right?  Why is everyone so solid that there's no SVDO/SVLTE?  Is it because the G2, which is using the same CPU doesn't have it?

 

From what I understand, before the G2 FCC docs came out, there were already rumors of triband devices not including SVLTE due to cost concerns. Now that the G2 and this GS4 Mini do not include it, the prediction is the rest will not include it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've concluded that the Note III's FCC docs aren't out yet, right? Why is everyone so solid that there's no SVDO/SVLTE? Is it because the G2, which is using the same CPU doesn't have it?

I think it has to do with so many radios and bands being crammed into one device. The only reason I might hold out a glimmer of hope is that the larger size of the Note could give them more flexibility to do so, maybe sorta could be.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...