Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3

linhpham2

By linhpham2
in Samsung

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Terrell352
Terrell352

Dear frequency fairy. It's me again. I know your probably tired of me asking and I hope it is within your power to help a poor lost cellular soul realize a world where sprint is on top and has a natio

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

Actually, the various Galaxy Note 3 FCC OET authorization docs must have been trickling in over the past few minutes because there are more now, including this one:   https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

Some posts in this thread are likely going to be sequestered, and the tone of this thread needs to get back on track.   S4GRU does not host rants.  End of story.   And those of you assigning "blam

Posted Images

sddabrow Member Level: 1x Advanced

sddabrow

Posted
Posted

Hmm I have a very tough decision right now. I was pretty gunho about the Note 3 but if it is this P variant, I may have to consider an alternative because I really don't want that single band LTE.

Right there with you.. Keeping this thread close

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ericdabbs Member Level: LTE Advanced

ericdabbs

Posted
Posted

Yikes! That could be couldn't it??? I see three bands of CDMA (PCS and two in the 800's) and only one of LTE (PCS)

 

Just when you thought we can all trust Sprint to do the right thing when it comes to these things.  There has to be something up with Sprint and Samsung not being on the same page.  We see what appears to be the GS4 mini pass through as triband LTE and they turn around and put the Note 3 as a single band LTE.  I don't get it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thewezgrays Member Level: eHRPD

thewezgrays

Posted
Posted

I still thought that triband was in the bag.. Now not so sure.. I guess I will hold out now for the HTC one max... The rumor of it being an exclusive gives more hope (but I also require an SD card so there is that)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ericdabbs Member Level: LTE Advanced

ericdabbs

Posted
Posted

Before we declare that the sky is falling, let's see is the S model hits the FCC.

 

Well we don't know if there will be a S variant hitting the FCC.  Also I found this.  I posted this earlier.  Kinda spells out that the S model is for SK Telekom in Korea although I didn't know that there were going to be a K and L models as well for Korea which were not listed in the leaks.

 

So if it is true that the S model is for SK Telekom we won't be seeing a FCC filing.

 

http://techkiddy.blogspot.com/2013/08/samsung-galaxy-note-iiism-n900ssm.html#

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zodiac12345 Member Level: 1x Advanced

zodiac12345

Posted
Posted

This thread reminds me of the thread about the leaks of the new "My Way" plans. Everyone on this site berated Sprint for making the plans. Then, all other tech sites praised it. 

 

Nevertheless, it seems the people waiting for triband LTE, will either get the LG G2 or the LD-D820, assuming it is the Nexus 5 and is intended for Sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ericdabbs Member Level: LTE Advanced

ericdabbs

Posted
Posted

This thread reminds me of the thread about the leaks of the new "My Way" plans. Everyone on this site berated Sprint for making the plans. Then, all other tech sites praised it. 

 

Nevertheless, it seems the people waiting for triband LTE, will either get the LG G2 or the LD-D820, assuming it is the Nexus 5 and is intended for Sprint. 

 

I am afraid so.  I am just trying to evaluate my options.  I will definitely have to check out the LG G2 at a verizon/att store this weekend as a backup option OR maybe even the HTC One Max if it peaks my interest enough assuming its triband LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dave Member Level: 4G WiMax

The Dave

Posted
Posted

The HTC One Max does look pretty good. If it has a stylus and sd slot, it can definitely give the Note 3 serious competition. Especially if it has triband and the Note doesn't. But, Samsung is usually ahead of things, so I just don't believe right now that they will release a single band LTE Note 3 to Sprint. Perhaps it is going to be delayed like the G2 and hasn't been submitted to the FCC yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ericdabbs Member Level: LTE Advanced

ericdabbs

Posted
Posted

The HTC One Max does look pretty good. If it has a stylus and sd slot, it can definitely give the Note 3 serious competition. Especially if it has triband and the Note doesn't. But, Samsung is usually ahead of things, so I just don't believe right now that they will release a single band LTE Note 3 to Sprint. Perhaps it is going to be delayed like the G2 and hasn't been submitted to the FCC yet?

 

I doubt Sprint would just present out any FCC docs as placeholder while they continue to do some more evaluation and resubmit more docs later.  The field testing should be done by now if it were to be released by early Oct like the rest of the other carriers.

 

I really hope the HTC One Max brings something that will make me consider that phone or else its off to maybe LG G2 or Nexus 5.  I just hate having to wait longer to upgrade my phone now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lilotimz Member Level: LTE Advanced

lilotimz

Posted
Posted

What begs the question, is that we had information saying two Samsung devices were to be released by year's end that support triband LTE. If one is going to be the S4 Mini...what's the other one?

 

It's two high end Samsung devices this fall with triband capabilities. The S4 mini is by no means high end and is more of a mid range phone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thewezgrays Member Level: eHRPD

thewezgrays

Posted
Posted

Engadget seems to think the R4 variant is meant for Sprint, which is dumb because even the Note II had band class 10 whereas the R4 variant does not.

 

http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/11/samsung-galaxy-note-3-reaches-the-fcc-in-att-and-sprint-forms/

That don't make sense... The "P" totally does because the bands match that of the S4 (and many others)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nickel Member Level: 4G WiMax

Nickel

Posted
Posted

That don't make sense... The "P" totally does because the bands match that of the S4 (and many others)..

Yeah I know, you think after doing this for so know they could figure out what bands to look for, but they probably just saw "CDMA" and said hey that's for Sprint!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thewezgrays Member Level: eHRPD

thewezgrays

Posted
Posted

Yeah I know, you think after doing this for so know they could figure out what bands to look for, but they probably just saw "CDMA" and said hey that's for Sprint!

If the tech blogs (and that is really all Engadget is) are that "stupid" makes you scared for the rest of the population...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nickel Member Level: 4G WiMax

Nickel

Posted
Posted

If the tech blogs (and that is really all Engadget is) are that "stupid" makes you scared for the rest of the population...

The rest of the population doesn't even a clue what a band is, much less who has what. Like I said they probably saw "CDMA" and then band 25 and connected it with Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yuhfhrh Member Level: eHRPD

Yuhfhrh

Posted
Posted

All of this is surprising to me! If the Note 3 does end up being just single band, I guess we can throw out the chances of a triband GS4 as well. It wouldn't make sense to have a triband s4, but not a triband note 3. Heck, it doesn't even make sense to have a triband GS4 mini and a single band Note 3. But Sprint said we would get a triband device from Samsung before years end.

 

...I don't know what I think at this point lol :frantic:  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ericdabbs Member Level: LTE Advanced

ericdabbs

Posted
Posted

All of this is surprising to me! If the Note 3 does end up being just single band, I guess we can throw out the chances of a triband GS4 as well. It wouldn't make sense to have a triband s4, but not a triband note 3. Heck, it doesn't even make sense to have a triband GS4 mini and a single band Note 3. But Sprint said we would get a triband device from Samsung before years end.

 

...I don't know what I think at this point lol :frantic:  

 

that is what I said.  Its hard to understand what Samsung is doing.  If the HTC One Max is triband LTE I really have to question Samsung and Sprint's thinking in making a single band LTE device like this at this point.  I highly doubt its because Sprint thought users of the Note 3 would prefer SVLTE over triband LTE.  I wish the mass amount of Sprint customers understood what triband LTE meant and how much of a bummer it is of the lack of support for it.  Why the GS4 mini got triband and not the Note 3 we will never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Jelly roll   Jelly Roll
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Yuhfhrh
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Yuhfhrh · Posted

      Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
    • RedSpark
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By RedSpark · Posted

      https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/05/att-announces-7-monthly-add-on-fee-for-turbo-5g-speeds/ Hopefully we don't ever see T-Mobile do something like this. Based on how I was treated with my Credit Limit, it's definitely not the same company it was before the merger, and it's entirely possible they'd try it.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...