Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

yes, however they could still could have kept legacy voice tech going during the transition, with V+D LTE ready for when the coverage is ready.

 

And no VOLTE is not the same as a dedicated or dynamic voice channel DTM'd or multiplexed over the connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding HSPA, per wiki UMTS release 7 supports voice over HSPA

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Mobile_Telecommunications_System

 

 


Release 7
  • Enhanced L2
  • 64 QAM, MIMO
  • Voice over HSPA
  • CPC – continuous packet connectivity
  • FRLC – Flexible RLC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding HSPA, per wiki UMTS release 7 supports voice over HSPA

 

Of course.  But no operator, as far as I know, has implemented the back end to support it.  The only current options are for third party VoIP apps.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick news.google search let me know that the T-Mobile and Verizon GN3 have passed thru FCC... we can't be much further behind!  I would think any delay would be good for us (final touches on tri-band maybe)...

 

EDIT: wouldn't it be nice if the GN3 launch (or any others) proceeded like the iPhone did?  Press release. FCC docs open up. Pre-order in three days.  Buy in 10 days. Apple totally has that down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EA quick news.google search let me know that the T-Mobile and Verizon GN3 have passed thru FCC... we can't be much further behind!  I would think any delay would be good for us (final touches on tri-band maybe)...

Every one of them passed through the FCC except the Sprint variant. I'm hoping our variant is NOT this one 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=134996&fcc_id=A3LSMN900P

 

It has mention of band class 10 for CDMA (SMR), and LTE band 25 (PCS G) along with GSM radios. 

 

I don't think this is our device however, because our variant should be A3LSMN900S.

 

Edit: If it is the Sprint variant, well, no triband for us

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every one of them passed through the FCC except the Sprint variant. I'm hoping our variant is NOT this one 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=134996&fcc_id=A3LSMN900P

 

It has mention of band class 10 for CDMA (SMR), and LTE band 25 (PCS G) along with GSM radios. 

 

I don't think this is our device however, because our variant should be A3LSMN900S.

 

Edit: If it is the Sprint variant, well, no triband for us

 

Yikes! That could be couldn't it??? I see three bands of CDMA (PCS and two in the 800's) and only one of LTE (PCS)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per androidauthority.com, here are the following variants of the Note 3. This article was made before IFA, so it is old news but has the model numbers that Samsung is using.

 

SM-N900 – base International Version of device based on Exynos SoC
SM-N9005 – international version based on Snapdragon SoC (probably Snapdragon 800)
SM-N900A – U.S. AT&T Version of Device
SM-N900T – T-Mobile Version
SM-N900V – Verizon Version
SM-N900S – Sprint Version
SM-N900R4 – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant (Rogers?), or simply test version passed to the testers
SM-N900P – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant.

 

Source: http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-3-mini-anyone-three-different-sizes-249412/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be great... And I figured it would end in an S anyways...

 

Still very curious on this "P" model... I am trying to figure out if the 2nd band in the 800's listed in SMR or not...

 

EDIT: I do not see the "lower" 800 stuff on the CDMA page -- only on the summary page -- so I guess that would make it definately not a Sprint phone... (total guesses as this stuff is Greek to me)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per androidauthority.com, here are the following variants of the Note 3. This article was made before IFA, so it is old news but has the model numbers that Samsung is using.

 

SM-N900 – base International Version of device based on Exynos SoC

SM-N9005 – international version based on Snapdragon SoC (probably Snapdragon 800)

SM-N900A – U.S. AT&T Version of Device

SM-N900T – T-Mobile Version

SM-N900V – Verizon Version

SM-N900S – Sprint Version

SM-N900R4 – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant (Rogers?), or simply test version passed to the testers

SM-N900P – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant.

 

The "R4" has USCC and C Spire written all over it, as it is only CDMA2000/LTE.  No GSM/W-CDMA.

 

Like it or not, my guess is that the "P" variant is for Sprint.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "R4" has USCC and C Spire written all over it, as it is only CDMA2000/LTE.  No GSM/W-CDMA.

 

Like it or not, my guess is that the "P" variant is for Sprint.

 

AJ

I hope you are wrong. If this is the sprint version.. I guess I will have to hold my breath for the htcone..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the "P" variant does support SVLTE.  So, my theory on the oversized Note 3 possibly sticking with single band LTE to maintain simultaneous CDMA1X voice and LTE may prove true.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this P one is NOT sprint, what else could it be?

 

C Spire is probably your only hope, but even that does make much sense.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen guys, everything is up in the air right now. The P variant may be Sprint or it may not. We won't know anything until the SM-N900S passes the FCC. 

 

That assumes there is an "S" variant submitted to the FCC OET.  We shall see.  But all of this has occurred in the last few hours.  I queried the FCC OET earlier today and found nothing new.  Josh, our FCC OET reporter, has not chimed in, so I may need to check if he has been asleep at his desk or playing video games again.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I initially checked the FCC, the Verizon "V", T-mobile "T", "R4", "P" and "W8" variants were already released. Around 4 PM Eastern time, the AT&T "A" variant trickled in. I was hoping the "S" variant would drop by, but it didn't. And as AJ mentioned, if there is an "S" variant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen guys, everything is up in the air right now. The P variant may be Sprint or it may not. We won't know anything until the SM-N900S passes the FCC.

 

the S might not, if it does not exist.. But yeah, I am not gonna worry about it until something official comes out..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...