Jump to content

Sprint LTE Coverage Maps via Sensorly


Recommended Posts

eeeek...

 

 

 

Error

 

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.

 

 

Error message

PDOException: SQLSTATE[08004] [1040] Too many connections in lock_may_be_available() (line167 of /homez.27/etrepere/www.sensorly.com/includes/lock.inc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eeeek...

 

Error

 

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.

 

Error message

PDOException: SQLSTATE[08004] [1040] Too many connections in lock_may_be_available() (line167 of /homez.27/etrepere/www.sensorly.com/includes/lock.inc).

 

Looks like their server upgrade may not have gone entirely as planned.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loads much faster here (web page on the PC). Nice upgrade. Glad to see you were not buried by your own success.

 

Hopefully there will be some purple to fill in in St Charles County soon and I gave give it a real workout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gone on three different trips in the past month to map areas in the north metro, and after each trip nothing would update.

 

I emailed sensorly each time and it seemed to me like I was being brushed off with excuses about how it would update in couple days.

 

It's easily been a month since some of those changes went up.

 

I went as far as wiping my phone to do a clean reinstall of everything.

 

It showed 4G captures, and uploaded those points to the server, but I'm pretty sure data is being lost.

 

I can't see using the app anymore given the last time it worked for me was about 300 miles ago. I can't afford driving around like a fool to map nothing.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gone on three different trips in the past month to map areas in the north metro, and after each trip nothing would update.

 

I emailed sensorly each time and it seemed to me like I was being brushed off with excuses about how it would update in couple days.

 

It's easily been a month since some of those changes went up.

 

I went as far as wiping my phone to do a clean reinstall of everything.

 

It showed 4G captures, and uploaded those points to the server, but I'm pretty sure data is being lost.

 

I can't see using the app anymore given the last time it worked for me was about 300 miles ago. I can't afford driving around like a fool to map nothing.

:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gone on three different trips in the past month to map areas in the north metro, and after each trip nothing would update.

 

I emailed sensorly each time and it seemed to me like I was being brushed off with excuses about how it would update in couple days.

 

It's easily been a month since some of those changes went up.

 

I went as far as wiping my phone to do a clean reinstall of everything.

 

It showed 4G captures, and uploaded those points to the server, but I'm pretty sure data is being lost.

 

I can't see using the app anymore given the last time it worked for me was about 300 miles ago. I can't afford driving around like a fool to map nothing.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

This is my experience as well for the last month or so. I have a WiMax phone so for fun I went around mapping because the map here is really low for actual WiMax coverage. Plus, I figured it may give people an idea of where the future Clearwire LTE bands could reach. Part of my job is driving around meeting suppliers so why not? Unfortunately all that was for naught as the maps still haven't updated my results and I am pretty much done bothering with it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would appear that updates are still not running. I would give it another day. Probably has a lot of data to catch up on.

 

I will say that the maps are loading MUCH quicker now, no lag time on the website, so that is nice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would appear that updates are still not running. I would give it another day. Probably has a lot of data to catch up on.

 

I will say that the maps are loading MUCH quicker now, no lag time on the website, so that is nice.

 

Yes very quick to load plus you have to think the longer it is down the longer the backlog to process which makes for even more of a backlog.

 

Give it time.. I am sure it will be awesome when it catches up.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

...

 

 

@ Cletus and Andrew, (unless you reset your phone before the data finished uploading) your data points will eventually be added, even if it takes a long time.

 

in the sensorly app > menu > details it will show how many messages are pending being sent.

 

Also, from what I remember, by default it only uploads data when plugged in and via wifi only. This can be changed in the settings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has been 4 days since I mapped and uploaded to several hundred points and still no update on the sensorly maps. While I can understand 24 delay this is going on much longer. Kinda takes away from the whole fun of it..

 

@l3x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has been 4 days since I mapped and uploaded to several hundred points and still no update on the sensorly maps. While I can understand 24 delay this is going on much longer. Kinda takes away from the whole fun of it..

 

@l3x

 

I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news: It looks like recent mapping is finally starting to show up. Points in the far Northwest of Chicagoland that I tracked last Friday just appeared on Sensorly a few minutes ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a post on sprint community by a Sprint rep that said Philly is 13% complete. This site says 45%. Which is right? I'm pretty sure the Sprint guy is wrong, but it concerns me. How come some areas launched below 40%, yet some are in the 50s and haven't launched yet? This is painful, because the 3g is cutting out now, during this work. At times, I have no data. None! My SG3 had to be put on 3g only. It kept flipping 4g to 3g and was even less useable than when steady 3g.

Edited by 66bobbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a post on sprint community by a Sprint rep that said Philly is 13% complete. This site says 45%. Which is right? I'm pretty sure the Sprint guy is wrong, but it concerns me. How come some areas launched below 40%, yet some are in the 50s and haven't launched yet? This is painful, because the 3g is cutting out now, during this work. At times, I have no data. None! My SG3 had to be put on 3g only. It kept flipping 4g to 3g and was even less useable than when steady 3g.

 

Philadelphia Metro market is 45% with NV upgrades. However, 13% is probably pretty accurate for LTE upgrades. Two different numbers.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff is finally showing up. I posted on the 3rd saying I got LTE 2 streets from my house, and it barely showed up today. I checked last night and it wasnt there, so this is good news. Hopefully within the next few days I'll have an LTE spot over my house because I briefly got LTE Monday night.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that the Coverage Map now starts up showing "Bouygues Telecom - 2G-3G" with the map centered somewhere in France -- or at least I think it's France, 'cuz all them names is in some funny furrin' language.

 

Then I have to scroll w-a-a-y down the page to find "Sprint 4G". OH, the pain and humiliation!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this link usually opens in the area associated with the geographic area of your ip.

 

http://www.sensorly.com/fullscreen/map/4G/US/USA/Sprint/lte_310sprint

 

For example, at home it opens on the stl area, while at work it opens on los angeles where my work dumps internet traffic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have gotten LTE in my bedroom a few times and in my living room twice. I'm wondering if the tower on Dean & Colonial is going to be the one I'll always be connected to from home. Anyone know if that tower might be able to give off a similar signal strength as the one by Lee Vista? I see a lot of LTE towers with a very low signal even being close by me, and distant ones that give me full bars. I don't really understand why.

Edited by XXavierXX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, we've started processing the backlog, we're still some days out but the backlog should be processed this weekend at the latest. Our servers are running at peak capacity. Follow status messages here http://status.sensorly.com/

 

Regarding the site, our site database went down and we couldn't even get to our backups so we got an old backup from 6 months ago and it looks like the geolocation stuff is missing, *sigh* And of course, this is a long bank holiday so there's no one to circumvent the isssue. *sigh* again...

The upside to this is that the site is much faster since we moved it to a new much much faster server

 

Thanks for your patience.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philadelphia Metro market is 45% with NV upgrades. However, 13% is probably pretty accurate for LTE upgrades. Two different numbers.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Robert, if that is accurate, then I guess spring launch is incorrect. 4g is one thing, but this testing and upgrade stuff is making all data use brutally rough. I thought I was looking at 45% LTE. Thanks for being there for me though. I need someone to get me off this ledge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...