Jump to content

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)


Recommended Posts

Check out this app on LTE only mode I was able to make calls (don't remember about receiving calls). Basically uses your Google voice number to make calls and such. It even was running fine on fringe LTE and EVDO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they finally turned up 1x800 at the site right outside my office...but I'm confused...do tri-band devices communicate on both 800Mhz and 1900Mhz at the same time? I was under the impression that it was single path, but here's my dilemma:

 

uploadfromtaptalk1401737215711.jpg

mu8yry4y.jpg

py3a2epa.jpg

y8ysy2e8.jpg

 

I am connected to 1x800 and evdo at the same time. I thought 1x800 wasn't including evdo. Also the signal looks crappier than evdo and I'm standing this far away from the site:

uploadfromtaptalk1401737215711.jpg

 

Sprint is top rack...

 

Also I have to force the test prl in the Premier section to attach to 800. Does anyone with production 1x800 know what SID and prl they are on and are getting working 1x800? Or sid it's 22433...

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

uploadfromtaptalk1401737414842.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they finally turned up 1x800 at the site right outside my office...but I'm confused...do tri-band devices communicate on both 800Mhz and 1900Mhz at the same time? I was under the impression that it was single path, but here's my dilemma:

 

attachicon.gifuploadfromtaptalk1401737215711.jpg

 

 

 

 

I am connected to 1x800 and evdo at the same time. I thought 1x800 wasn't including evdo. Also the signal looks crappier than evdo and I'm standing this far away from the site:

attachicon.gifuploadfromtaptalk1401737414842.jpg

 

Sprint is top rack...

 

Also I have to force the test prl in the Premier section to attach to 800. Does anyone with production 1x800 know what SID and prl they are on and are getting working 1x800? Or sid it's 22433...

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Yea you can be connected to evdo and 1x800 at the same time.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

You are not actually connected to both at the same time. For single path devices like the G2, N5, HTC One M8, etc, when not on LTE, the radio bounces between 1x and EVDO. If you watch signal check, you'll notice that only one of the technologies updates at a time. Unlike say the HTC One M7, where both 1x and EVDO update at the same time. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are not actually connected to both at the same time. For single path devices like the G2, N5, HTC One M8, etc, when not on LTE, the radio bounces between 1x and EVDO. If you watch signal check, you'll notice that only one of the technologies updates at a time. Unlike say the HTC One M7, where both 1x and EVDO update at the same time.

Thanks for the clarification David! I was wondering how that happened...

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can also be recieving a 1xrtt signal(either 800 or 1900) from one tower and ev-do from a different tower which is what appears to be happening at your office. If the 1xrtt 800MHz signal you are receiving were coming from the same tower as your ev-do it would be around -45dbm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can also be recieving a 1xrtt signal(either 800 or 1900) from one tower and ev-do from a different tower which is what appears to be happening at your office. If the 1xrtt 800MHz signal you are receiving were coming from the same tower as your ev-do it would be around -45dbm.

I have the issue of my 800mhz voice service being weaker than evdo and 1900mhz voice being the same or in some case better. I know that these signals are coming from the same site. Why is this? 800mhz is the stronger signal right?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the issue of my 800mhz voice service being weaker than evdo and 1900mhz voice being the same or in some case better. I know that these signals are coming from the same site. Why is this? 800mhz is the stronger signal right?

During the testing phase power output may be much lower than after acceptance. I know that one of the sites that I use regularly was like that. When it first started broadcasting 800MHz it was only usable for ~1 mile from the tower and signal levels when right by the tower were in the -70db range. Now it is at full power and covers a much greater area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the issue of my 800mhz voice service being weaker than evdo and 1900mhz voice being the same or in some case better. I know that these signals are coming from the same site. Why is this? 800mhz is the stronger signal right?

 

All else being equal (including the frequency), CDMA 1x will have superior propagation to Ev-DO, thanks mostly to having a lower order of modulation. Sprint chose to not deploy Ev-DO on SMR, so Ev-DO will always have a weaker signal and drop out before 1x (on either frequency) does.

 

Assuming that all sites in your area are upgraded, 1xA 800 should be the absolute last type of Sprint signal to drop before you begin to roam or have no service. As ImmerStark said, it is likely they are still testing things at that site, because tests are usually conducted at minimal power output and full downtilt. If 1x800 coverage remains subpar for more than a week or two, I would let Sprint know that the site has been left improperly configured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All else being equal (including the frequency), CDMA 1x will have superior propagation to Ev-DO, thanks mostly to having a lower order of modulation. Sprint chose to not deploy Ev-DO on SMR, so Ev-DO will always have a weaker signal and drop out before 1x (on either frequency) does.

 

Assuming that all sites in your area are upgraded, 1xA 800 should be the absolute last type of Sprint signal to drop before you begin to roam or have no service. As ImmerStark said, it is likely they are still testing things at that site, because tests are usually conducted at minimal power output and full downtilt. If 1x800 coverage remains subpar for more than a week or two, I would let Sprint know that the site has been left improperly configured.

I have two sites near me. The closest site has LTE and cdma 800, it has been deployed for 5 months or so. The other site I bounce off of from time to time has LTE but no 800 deployed yet. Could this be why tilt might be off and has minimal power?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the issue of my 800mhz voice service being weaker than evdo and 1900mhz voice being the same or in some case better. I know that these signals are coming from the same site. Why is this? 800mhz is the stronger signal right?

 

I have the same issue.  Granted, I have a Note II that I have loaded a custom PRL on so I get 1x800 at all (Since some Note IIs really have problems on 1x800)  So maybe it is just my phone.  I get about a bar stronger signal at my condo on 1x800, yet the 1900 quality is better.

 

I may even just accept the non-800MHz PRL is forcing on the Note IIs because of this.

 

If the 800 signal is strong, then there's no issue and quality is very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im noticing 800 mhz LTE in the SW Florida area. Does that mean spark is coming to that area? Or is it just plain 800 mhz deployment. Plus I'm noticing a slight change in coverage but not a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im noticing 800 mhz LTE in the SW Florida area. Does that mean spark is coming to that area? Or is it just plain 800 mhz deployment. Plus I'm noticing a slight change in coverage but not a big difference.

 

Full acceptance of all five 800/1900 Network Vision upgrades on a cell site is a prerequisite to Nokia's rollout of 8T8R band 41 upgrades on the same site. That doesn't mean that 800 LTE is indicative of a band 41 upgrade coming soon, just that it won't be possible otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1x800 deployment has been funny here. My Moto X has been latching onto it quite frequently, but the coverage seems identical to 1x1900... Calls drop in the same locations while driving as they did on 1900.

 

Signalcheck never shows my 1x800 signal going below -104db. If it's bouncing around from -100 to -104 when i'm on the fringe, it's working fine... but if it sits at -104 too long it seems as if it doesn't have a usable data link, and just hasn't figured that out yet. Eventually it will drop back to 1900 until it scans for 800 again.

 

Also, Signalcheck is showing 800mhz service from two different towers in my area, both with different addresses than the towers I knew about with LTE. I haven't zeroed in on them yet to see if they actually turned up new towers for 800mhz, or if Signalcheck just has the addresses wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1x800 deployment has been funny here. My Moto X has been latching onto it quite frequently, but the coverage seems identical to 1x1900... Calls drop in the same locations while driving as they did on 1900.

 

Signalcheck never shows my 1x800 signal going below -104db. If it's bouncing around from -100 to -104 when i'm on the fringe, it's working fine... but if it sits at -104 too long it seems as if it doesn't have a usable data link, and just hasn't figured that out yet. Eventually it will drop back to 1900 until it scans for 800 again.

 

Also, Signalcheck is showing 800mhz service from two different towers in my area, both with different addresses than the towers I knew about with LTE. I haven't zeroed in on them yet to see if they actually turned up new towers for 800mhz, or if Signalcheck just has the addresses wrong...

 

The 1x location is often offset from the actual cell site into the serving cell. And if you're not seeing a performance improvement on 1x800, it probably isn't fully optimized yet.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1x location is often offset from the actual cell site into the serving cell. And if you're not seeing a performance improvement on 1x800, it probably isn't fully optimized yet.

 

That makes sense. The address range shown is about 1-2 miles from where the actual sites are. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I new to this thread. I have a question about 800MHz LTE and Sprints 2.5GHz band 41. I live in Southern Michigan and about a week ago I talked to some Sprint tower climbers that were installing 2.5 equipment on a water tower in my rural area. The first thing I was wondering is why they would be installing 2.5GHz equipment before 800MHz LTE antennas? Seems like that would be installed in bigger cities this early in the upgrade process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I new to this thread. I have a question about 800MHz LTE and Sprints 2.5GHz band 41. I live in Southern Michigan and about a week ago I talked to some Sprint tower climbers that were installing 2.5 equipment on a water tower in my rural area. The first thing I was wondering is why they would be installing 2.5GHz equipment before 800MHz LTE antennas? Seems like that would be installed in bigger cities this early in the upgrade process. 

 

Are you saying that they were adding 2.5 GHz equipment to a legacy site, or that they were creating a new site with 2.5 GHz equipment only? Because you may see the latter frequently since 2.5 GHz requires denser site spacing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying that they were adding 2.5 GHz equipment to a legacy site, or that they were creating a new site with 2.5 GHz equipment only? Because you may see the latter frequently since 2.5 GHz requires denser site spacing.

They were adding 2.5 GHz equipment to an existing site that has been 3G upgraded and has added 1900 MHz equipment to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were adding 2.5 GHz equipment to an existing site that has been 3G upgraded and has added 1900 MHz equipment to it.

The equipment that is added to make a site 3G upgraded contains the 800 equipment in it.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except in this case; depending on where he's located in Southern Michigan he may be in the IBEZ, and Samsung has installed antennas and RRUs that are capable of only 1900 MHz.

West of I-69 is the rough cutoff for the IBEZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except in this case; depending on where he's located in Southern Michigan he may be in the IBEZ, and Samsung has installed antennas and RRUs that are capable of only 1900 MHz.

West of I-69 is the rough cutoff for the IBEZ.

The panels that are installed are still capable of 800, but they only install RRU's that are capable of 1900.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems weird that they don't install the 800MHz RRUs in the IBEZ even though eventually 800 will be available in that area for Sprint to use. Seems like it's unnecessary extra work for the installer techs, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...