Jump to content

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)


Recommended Posts

Is anyone experiencing issues with reception on the 1x 800 band? I have had absolutely terrible service for the last few weeks. I can't complete a phone call and it is constantly cutting out to the point that I can't understand anyone on my Galaxy S4. I get a great -73-83dbm signal strength on 1x800 so I am not sure why I am having issues. Is anyone else experiencing this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is anyone experiencing issues with reception on the 1x 800 band? I have had absolutely terrible service for the last few weeks. I can't complete a phone call and it is constantly cutting out to the point that I can't understand anyone on my Galaxy S4. I get a great -73-83dbm signal strength on 1x800 so I am not sure why I am having issues. Is anyone else experiencing this?

 

i have this off and on with 1x800 here too. some calls will be perfect, some calls will be crap. deployment is still under way here and most people i talk to on the other end are on sprint too. so it could be where they are thats causing the issues and not with my end. i have no idea what causes it though, i just know sometimes its great and sometimes its not, and even other times the call will dial and connect on 800 and then within a few seconds of the call punt me over to 1900. then when the call finishes my phone goes back to 800 (running the 800 priority PRL)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DigiClaws

How far can a 800Mhz cell signal propogate in a rural area that is for the most part flat? Maybe some tress that are no more than 40 feet tall. Just trying to figure out how much the Sprint voice coverage will expand at the perimeter towers and if it will fill any roaming gaps inside of native coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How far can a 800Mhz cell signal propogate in a rural area that is for the most part flat? Maybe some tress that are no more than 40 feet tall. Just trying to figure out how much the Sprint voice coverage will expand at the perimeter towers and if it will fill any roaming gaps inside of native coverage.

 

Not sure how accurate this is, but on more than one occasion some of our members have reported connecting to sites that are nearly 10 miles away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah last week I was around 40 miles from an 800Mhz tower.

 

Also when I was in Sharon, PA I had a super strong 800Mhz signal that just wouldn't budge off of five bars even as I drive up and down steep hills.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are a premium member (which I strongly suggest you become!), the site acceptance reports have 800Mhz towers going live in IBEZ Zones like crazy. Become a member and check it out!

 

I don't know how they pulled it off, but I'm happy.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How far can a 800Mhz cell signal propogate in a rural area that is for the most part flat? Maybe some tress that are no more than 40 feet tall. Just trying to figure out how much the Sprint voice coverage will expand at the perimeter towers and if it will fill any roaming gaps inside of native coverage.

I've personally had several customers in rural Texas complain of a lack of coverage after migrating from iDEN to CDMA, and when I looked up their location they had been 7-8 miles away from the nearest iDEN tower. They swore that they had flawless Nextel coverage even though our maps showed them as being in a marginal coverage area. I know it's apples and oranges to compare CDMA and iDEN even on the same frequencies, and in a lot of these areas in Texas feature ideal terrain for wide coverage; flat land, tall towers, low vegetation, etc. But when you figure that the new towers will be 800 mhz and use newer technology, I think there'll be coverage pretty far out there in the rural areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think it will be interesting to see how far out into the ocean coverage will work as well. I bet people on cruise ships will be able to get signal much further away from port than before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think it will be interesting to see how far out into the ocean coverage will work as well. I bet people on cruise ships will be able to get signal much further away from port than before.

 

Will help for sure, but not as well as on land i don't think, i remember reading that the water vapor/moisture really degrade the signal much faster than over dry land

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will help for sure, but not as well as on land i don't think, i remember reading that the water vapor/moisture really degrade the signal much faster than over dry land

 

Also from what I understand, all towers by the coast have their antennas pointed towards land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How far can a 800Mhz cell signal propogate in a rural area that is for the most part flat? Maybe some tress that are no more than 40 feet tall. Just trying to figure out how much the Sprint voice coverage will expand at the perimeter towers and if it will fill any roaming gaps inside of native coverage.

 

 

Not sure how accurate this is, but on more than one occasion some of our members have reported connecting to sites that are nearly 10 miles away.

Multiple, if not numerous, reports of users picking up a usable 1x800MHz signal at distances of 30-50 miles. You can't expect that everywhere, but coverage is certainly going to go up, and fill in any gaps in coverage between sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So I was skiing today at Lutsen which is less than 60 miles away from the border and noticed I was connected to 1x800. From the IBEZ maps I saw this part of the state was well into the zone. I was up here this fall and 1x800 was not active. I'm not sure if this is helpful or not but I though I would make my observation known. Hopefully the picture works. I'm new to this type of stuff.

 

Screenshot_2013-12-20-16-12-27.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also from what I understand, all towers by the coast have their antennas pointed towards land.

 

No, that is not accurate.  Plenty of cellular antennas are coincidentally or even intentionally directed toward the water.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will help for sure, but not as well as on land i don't think, i remember reading that the water vapor/moisture really degrade the signal much faster than over dry land

 

That, too, is not accurate.  Because there are no obstructions other than the curvature of the Earth, propagation over water tends to significantly exceed that over land.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that is not accurate. Plenty of cellular antennas are coincidentally or even intentionally directed toward the water.

 

AJ

Some companies even build out networks and shoot backhaul from water based location to water based location miles from land. Some guy I know was even crazy enough to climb out there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.dropbox.com/s/73fj3059g5ni5u5/2013-12-21%2008.59.22.png

https://www.dropbox.com/s/m0jkclovxo5nwv4/2013-12-21%2009.00.25.png

 

connected to one approx 45 miles away. on the screenshot it says 43 miles but I got CDMA 800 a couple of miles before I went on google maps and took a screenshot.

 

Had the signal for like 10 minutes before fading.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the reasoning? Most customers are on land.

Many people here in Florida tend to go out miles off coast in yachts, fishing boats, Cruise ships, and plenty of small islands strung all down the coast. Seems perfectly reasonable to expect that a tower pushes a signal out for them.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my observations, there are areas where they appear to specifically set up sectors along coastlines to maximize coverage on land, and others where they appear that they are intentionally trying to cover water as well.

 

I have noticed in many places along the coasts of Florida and Southern California that they often appear to point sectors directly across the water. However, in Washington State, Oregon and most of Northern California, the sectors seemed to be aimed toward land. (Not including inland bodies of water like SF Bay and Puget Sound)

 

On a cruise through SF Bay and under the Golden Gate, I lost my signal only 1-2 miles out on the open sea. However, I have been able to keep a signal 12-15 miles out of Miami before.

 

I like to look at the sectors when I am along the coast and see where they are aimed. It's fun. Well, at least to me. Occasionally you can find a MW radome pointed straight out to sea.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've also noticed this. A while back I would go out on my friends boat (beautiful Everglades 32 ft, 3 350 engines.... Thing could outrun the coast guard if it had too....ironically we got pulled over once by them and they said its a good thing y'all didn't run because we would've had to call in the chopper.... miss it so much) Anyhow, I would pretty much always have service even several miles off the coast. It was nice. Girls had to be able to upload to Instagram somehow! LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...