Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

By end of February, what are you thoughts about how much LTE will be up in NYC. That's about a month and a half.

 

Could be a lot, could be none.

 

Honestly it's tough to gauge how fast or slow the deployment will be. So many varying factors, especially in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooklyn near 11214, inside brooklyn public library near ps97 got lte. Im on it right now. Speeds not bad about 10mbps. Not sure if im mapping it correctly. All I need to do is jist open the sensorly map correct?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooklyn near 11214, inside brooklyn public library near ps97 got lte. Im on it right now. Speeds not bad about 10mbps. Not sure if im mapping it correctly. All I need to do is jist open the sensorly map correct?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

Easiest way is to click "Map Trip" and it will show you the data points it is mapping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By end of February, what are you thoughts about how much LTE will be up in NYC. That's about a month and a half.

 

I honestly believe that depending on how well Sprint does in the NYC Market it will determine how well Network Vision changes their customers mind. If Sprint fails to deliver well I would expect the downfall of Sprint. By the end of february I expect LTE in more places, how ever I know NYC won't be half complete. By June I expect NYC nearing completion. I just want Sprint to claim #1 spot in fastest and most stable network, they once were king right?

 

--

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I honestly believe that depending on how well Sprint does in the NYC Market it will determine how well Network Vision changes their customers mind. If Sprint fails to deliver well I would expect the downfall of Sprint. By the end of february I expect LTE in more places, how ever I know NYC won't be half complete. By June I expect NYC nearing completion. I just want Sprint to claim #1 spot in fastest and most stable network, they once were king right?

 

--

Chris

Where they ever that good? I really dont know since I started using sprint only two years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I am not sure, but I remember that's what everyone used to have and talk about. So I would guess they were once that good?

 

--

Chris

I am sure sprint will catch up. 2013 is their year to turn it over and if not, it will be a big disappointment. If it wasnt for this site, I would've dropped sprint and went to tmobile. I hope I made the right decision.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure sprint will catch up. 2013 is their year to turn it over and if not, it will be a big disappointment. If it wasnt for this site, I would've dropped sprint and went to tmobile. I hope I made the right decision.

 

Everyone who choose to stay with Sprint did the best decision in their life, Sprint is changing, Sprint is starting new, what more can anyone want? Sprint is using new technology to delivery the best service possible, I am not just saying that I believe that! New towers, and technology packed into every 1 tower spread over 30,000 towers they have. Now that's truly amazing. Sprint :tu:

 

--

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the day, Sprint was the number #1 provider in terms of data speeds and throughput. They were a company of firsts, and some can say, still are.

 

But the huge explosion in data demand, combined with the steady decline of customers, and mis-management and direction, brought Sprint down to the bottom, spiraling the drain. It took Dan Hesse being as radical as possible, to save the company.

 

I'm going to be hitting my 10th year soon, and I can safely say, I've seen it all.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i see(sensorly map) that in the bronx there`s really some dark purple and some really light purple coverage, will that stay that way or will the light coverage get darker once LTE its officially turned on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i see(sensorly map) that in the bronx there`s really some dark purple and some really light purple coverage, will that stay that way or will the light coverage get darker once LTE its officially turned on?

 

Keep in mind, Sensorly is crowd-sourced, so the more readings people upload, the darker the colors will get.

 

Eventually the LTE coverage will mirror the existing 3G (EVDO) coverage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As will the majority of the Sprint customer base, other than those 1%'ers who will find a reason to complain always.

 

I look at our 3G coverage now, and once NV is done, you'll see LTE on those same towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long after the sensorly maps a tower does it show on the maps?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

10-20 minutes I think.

 

Usually within 15 minutes or so. Sometimes up to a couple hours it seems depending on the servers and the re-rendering of the layers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the day, Sprint was the number #1 provider in terms of data speeds and throughput. They were a company of firsts, and some can say, still are.

 

But the huge explosion in data demand, combined with the steady decline of customers, and mis-management and direction, brought Sprint down to the bottom, spiraling the drain. It took Dan Hesse being as radical as possible, to save the company.

 

I'm going to be hitting my 10th year soon, and I can safely say, I've seen it all.

 

Well said, I was with them when they 1st opened the doors leaving AT&T which was cellular 1 which was mobile 1, or mobile trends 1989 is so long ago lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the day, Sprint was the number #1 provider in terms of data speeds and throughput. They were a company of firsts, and some can say, still are.

 

But the huge explosion in data demand, combined with the steady decline of customers, and mis-management and direction, brought Sprint down to the bottom, spiraling the drain. It took Dan Hesse being as radical as possible, to save the company.

 

I'm going to be hitting my 10th year soon, and I can safely say, I've seen it all.

I concur. Folks complain about Dan and his methods/decisions, but I for one think the man knows what he is doing and actually saved Sprint.

 

And to keep this topic on track, I have to confess that I am so damn pissed. I went to New Jersey (Newark actually) to pick up a router that a buddy left last month while traveling from the UK. I go, pick it up and drive north to avoid the tunnel and Manhattan, I drive right into the Bronx (LTE Heaven) and then back home in Queens. i took the long way. Once home I noticed that I forgot to even look at my phone to see if I got a 4G LTE signal. aarrgghhh so close and blew my chance. :angry::blush:

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
    • Welcome back! That's similar to my best (1250ish). A few people have broken 2000 on good sites. 
    • Lots of new multi-carrier nodes popping up in Bushwick. Crown Castle Fiber node at Ridgewood & Palmetto:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Irving & Jefferson:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Wilson & Noll:  
    • I’m surprised they’re running a 5x5 Band 66 carrier still. In NYC T-Mobile has 25x25 AWS and they’re running 20x20 Band 66 and 5x5 n66 (in testing). Presumably when n66 commercially launches they’ll drop Band 66 down to 15x15 and go straight for a 10x10 n66 carrier like they did with n25. 
    • Austin has now narrowed B2 to 15x15 to support a second 10x10 n25 channel, this time entirely in PCS A-F. So T-Mobile now has 35x35 FD (n71 + n25) and 180 MHz TD (n41) NR live here, and LTE single carrier bandwidth now tops out at 15x15. LTE is down to 5x5 B12, 15x15 B2, 10x10+10x10+5x5 B66, so they now have 5 carriers each of LTE and NR, with 45x45 total LTE.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...