Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

 

https://network.sprint.com/

 

not everyone agrees with "2 data speed upgrade" = LTE ready, but it seems very reliable source when you match it up with sensorly.

 

Yeah , sometimes it just means 3G has been upgraded , but when you go over there map it & well find out .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just barely getting a signal in Ozone Park 11416. 101st Ave. and Woodhaven Blvd. Got 73ms, 0.94/0.80. Even though it's not good for LTE but it's an improvement over the terrible 3G here. LOL.

 

Sent from my Sprint Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think MetroPCS uses a 1.4x1.4 LTE configuration here, which means their LTE is no faster than Sprints Upgraded 3G for the most part. Their coverage is very good in the city however. There are only a few places with 5x5 and I think that most if not all are in their home state of Florida.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone used metropcs lte phone? How is their lte coverage and speed in nyc?

 

Their coverage is good in NYC, but you will be lucky to hit 2mbps on it. The LTE on metro is what 3G will be once NV is complete. (usable) If your trying to get Metro for speed, your wasting your time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no connectivity in the subways. It'll be super annoying. Its weird enough when people are talking through Bluetooth on the train and you know the person doesn't have a cell signal.Besides, the subway infrastructure is over 100 years old and probably does not have enough space to hold basestations and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they putting LTE in the subways?

#7 runs on an elevated line once it reaches queens. I really hope there will never be any voice service in the tunnels. Standing next to 5 different people talking in 5 different languages is not fun after a long day at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they should just enable data on subway tunnels. Forget voice. So lte would be perfect. But glwt

 

I wonder what they are gonna do in dc and sf places that actually have service in the tunnels.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try as I may, you completely lost me in that post?

 

TS

 

Sorry, my phone was acting stupid. I was saying that it carries more debt than the entire state of California. To have to do more construction underground would just make them lose more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were deploying a 10 x 10? All of the reports seem to point to a 5 x 5 LTE network. A while back a report came out of Kansas City that they were testing a 5 x 5.

 

That varies from market to market. It depends upon how much AWS spectrum that T-Mobile can spare for LTE. In KC and NYC, that is only 5 MHz FDD.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they should just enable data on subway tunnels. Forget voice. So lte would be perfect. But glwt

 

I wonder what they are gonna do in dc and sf places that actually have service in the tunnels.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

People would be talking over data then.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were deploying a 10 x 10? All of the reports seem to point to a 5 x 5 LTE network. A while back a report came out of Kansas City that they were testing a 5 x 5.

 

It might be they are just doing 5x5 for testing. You may have to wait until the end of the refarm before they upgrade it to a 10x10 or a 20x20.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...