Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy S8 & Dual Sim/Duos


Andrew Revering

Recommended Posts

People have been saying HPUE has not made of a different. It has nothing to do with your city. It's all about the device.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

oh. I think I was confused on it. Thank you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question regarding the Sprint Galaxy S8. I have my roaming settings all turned on and all my roam alerts turned off. However, when I "Update Profile" on my phone, all those changes I made reset to the default. Do you guys know why or how I can fix this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question regarding the Sprint Galaxy S8. I have my roaming settings all turned on and all my roam alerts turned off. However, when I "Update Profile" on my phone, all those changes I made reset to the default. Do you guys know why or how I can fix this?

That always happens, just the way it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question regarding the Sprint Galaxy S8. I have my roaming settings all turned on and all my roam alerts turned off. However, when I "Update Profile" on my phone, all those changes I made reset to the default. Do you guys know why or how I can fix this?

That always happens, just the way it is.

To clarify, when you "update profile" you are doing exactly that, resetting your settings to default.  May I ask why you are changing the settings and then doing an update profile?  You shouldn't have to manually update profile, really ever unless you are having device / tower issues...  There is no workaround.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clarify, when you "update profile" you are doing exactly that, resetting your settings to default.  May I ask why you are changing the settings and then doing an update profile?  You shouldn't have to manually update profile, really ever unless you are having device / tower issues...  There is no workaround.

Hmm, I'm usually not doing a profile update. I think I was mainly playing with my S8 as I just got it. I also saw it update the "profile" on it's own before so just curious. If I remember, I don't think it was like this on my S6. It stayed on the setting it was before. Thanks for your input :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The unlocked GS8/GS8+ is now available for pre-order from Best Buy and Samsung. Is anyone going to go with this version?

I've been thinking about it.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The unlocked GS8/GS8+ is now available for pre-order from Best Buy and Samsung. Is anyone going to go with this version?

I'll get it once Coral Blue comes out.

 

Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The unlocked GS8/GS8+ is now available for pre-order from Best Buy and Samsung.  Is anyone going to go with this version?

 

I want it so bad -- but I already bought a Sprint version and I don't know how I can justify switching it out since I can't return this. I'd have to sell it on eBay or something. I'll probably end up sticking with the Sprint version. Bah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used Samsung Pay for the first time today. Honestly it might have convinced me to switch over, at least until more payment terminals adopt NFC. I went to CVS (which for some reason doesn't allow you to use Android Pay) and decided to try Samsung pay instead. I held it by the card reader and it recognized my card just as fast as NFC does.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used Samsung Pay for the first time today. Honestly it might have convinced me to switch over, at least until more payment terminals adopt NFC. I went to CVS (which for some reason doesn't allow you to use Android Pay) and decided to try Samsung pay instead. I held it by the card reader and it recognized my card just as fast as NFC does.

Samsung Pay will keep me using Samsung for the foreseeable future.

 

It will fail sometimes but only because the cashier hasn't enabled "credit". Then just tap again. But that only happens < 1% of the time for me. Normally works awesome and is far quicker than chip card. Works absolutely everywhere a swipe machine is installed (except plunge style readers at the gas station, hit or miss whether it works there).

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung Pay will keep me using Samsung for the foreseeable future.

 

It will fail sometimes but only because the cashier hasn't enabled "credit". Then just tap again. But that only happens < 1% of the time for me. Normally works awesome and is far quicker than chip card. Works absolutely everywhere a swipe machine is installed (except plunge style readers at the gas station, hit or miss whether it works there).

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

A stated a few specific use cases that are part of the reason why I plan on going back to Android Pay earlier.

 

One is the ease of use when it comes to certain membership cards, specifically Walgreens. Another reason is easy withdrawal of money from my bank since they have NFC enabled ATMs that work with Android Pay. My last reason is that Samsung Pay still doesn't offer support for all of my banks/cards yet whereas Android Pay does.

 

 

Edit: Samsung Pay works with NFC ATMs. I just tried it and it worked.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This page shows that the GS8+ for Sprint does not support 2g/3g 1900/800 frequencies, just the 3 LTE bands.

 

I have to imagine this is incorrect..... right?

 

When I'm in bumf*** Egypt, I want to know that I'll at least fall back to 1xRTT.

Without those frequencies you would not be able to make a call.

 

So rest assured that they are indeed included.

 

BTW, all versions of the GS8 are in fact the same, once you boot the phone up with the corresponding sim card, it installs the carrier firmware accordingly.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anybody else been getting "Unable to establish a wireless data connection"  LTE: ESM-31 EMM-x" error?...randomly ?...I've called support and they did the normal profile update/ factory reset procedures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anybody else been getting "Unable to establish a wireless data connection" LTE: ESM-31 EMM-x" error?...randomly ?...I've called support and they did the normal profile update/ factory reset procedures.

Yes! But data is working normally. So.....unsure.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally got a chance to test this phones B41/B25 performance in a favorable environment attached to a site with B25/B25-2nd C/B26 and B41-3XCA

 

I tested B25 only and B41 only also did B25/B41 and kept B26 disabled for testing.

 

One thing I noticed about this phone running the latest baseband is that it switches and latches onto B26 too easily. I think their could be some tuning issues on the baseband and network side to better support HPUE.

But my testing mostly affirms Sprint's claim of 90%+ of B25 coverage.

 

Did testing at the edge of B41 signal for comparison...

 

B25 only              -112dBm 4.1mb down/2mb up 52ms

B25 only -2nd C  -113dBm 3.3mb down/1.4mb up 49ms 

 

B41 only              -123dBm 9mb down/.45mb up 120ms (Super impressed that 3XCA kept a connection at this signal level, all 3 carriers hovered around similar signal levels)

 

B41/B25 both enabled, B41 would drop around -124dBm and latch onto a B25 -113dBm signal, once I moved deeper indoors B25 would die out around -116dBm (10-12 ft deeper indoors)  So at the end of the day, they were pretty close in terms of coverage. 

 

For comparison my girl's G5 would drop B41 at -115dBm (around 15ft sooner than GS8+) and switch to a -105dBm B25 signal.

 

*Other small notes*

 

I ran each scenario at least 10 times to assure some sort of consistency, all posted results were peak performance.

 

One negative side of having B41 in such weak levels was the ping times, I almost always had 100+ ms pings when signal level were over -118dBm (compared to 20-30ms when under -115dBm)

 

Surprisingly, the uploads on B41 weren't as bad as I had expected (probably because tower was completely unloaded) Even at the weakest levels, I was seeing at least .50 upload and many times over 2mb.

 

Hope this helps folks have a slightly better understanding of how HPUE could benefit them, and also the fact that its still in its infancy and needs time to be fleshed out.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes! But data is working normally. So.....unsure.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I turned off WiFi and then rebooted, I haven't had the error for about 2 hours.  I'll wait and see.

 

Edit: The error came back with WiFi off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Has anybody else been getting "Unable to establish a wireless data connection"  LTE: ESM-31 EMM-x" error?...randomly ?...I've called support and they did the normal profile update/ factory reset procedures.

 

I just got this error for the first time today as well... certainly something on Sprint's side that I doubt needs to be concerned with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...