Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

More Sascha Segan bromance with T-Mobile...

 

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2496645,00.asp

 

Here is another interesting tidbit...

 

I have loaded Sascha's article twice today.  Both times, I initially saw the number at 10 comments posted.  Then, as the page fully loaded, the number of comments dropped to 0-1.  Is that a bug or comment moderation?  Comment moderation is recommended -- see the FierceWireless train wreck.  But the only comment available now is from Brett Schulte, who is something of a known troll.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another interesting tidbit...

 

I have loaded Sascha's article twice today.  Both times, I initially saw the number at 10 comments posted.  Then, as the page fully loaded, the number of comments dropped to 0-1.  Is that a bug or comment moderation?  Comment moderation is recommended -- see the FierceWireless train wreck.  But the only comment available now is from Brett Schulte, who is something of a known troll.

 

AJ

 

I see two every time I load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see two every time I load.

 

Check the timestamp of the second comment.  It is only 12 minutes ago.

 

Is somebody moderating…censoring...watching?

 

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Food for thought. T-Mobile reduces bandwidth for all video regardless of whether it is exempt from your cap or not.

 

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/12/t_mobile_s_binge_on_program_likely_violates_net_neutrality.html

And that's the slippery slope a lot of folks talked about with T-Mobile...

 

John Legere just wiped his ass with copies of the Net Neutrality Rule Book.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Sascha Segan, by most appearances, goes above and beyond objective reporting on T-Mobile.  More like prioritized reporting on T-Mobile.  Positive reporting on T-Mobile.  Would Sprint ever get the same treatment for any market?

 

 

The Magenta Effect. Karl Bode does the same thing as does Roger Cheng and probably a slew of others in the tech media. Who knew that something as simple as having the CEO throw out random expletives was the key to getting journalists/bloggers to eat out of the palm of your hand.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's the slippery slope a lot of folks talked about with T-Mobile...

 

John Legere just wiped his ass with copies of the Net Neutrality Rule Book.

And if I didn't think that would have ramifications toward Title 2, I'd laugh it off. Problem is that Verizon has the best legal counsel money can buy and they will challenge Title 2 in the courts, all the way to the Supreme Court if they have to. And I know in the back of my mind that corporate friendly judges like Scalia and Thomas will be looking at Verizon's arguments with a friendly eye. You think Verizon's lawyers won't bring up BingeOn?

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People were noting this was happening with YouTube on Reddit. BingeOn was on, 1080p videos buffered. Turned off, they streamed perfectly.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

I've noticed that too. My YouTube videos buffer atleast once it twice. Eventually it'll play wothout stopping.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those magentans fans thank you for praising your lord for destroying net neutrality. Now Verizon will take the best Lawyers in the country that money can buy and shred it in the Supreme Court. Binge on will be part of the argument. They will smack the FCC chairman and will use his talking points about praising binge on against him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those magentans fans thank you for praising your lord for destroying net neutrality. Now Verizon will take the best Lawyers in the country that money can buy and shred it in the Supreme Court. Binge on will be part of the argument. They will smack the FCC chairman and will use his talking points about praising binge on against him.

I'm sure Verizon will burn as much money as they can to get T-Mobile on binge on..

 

Maybe even the three carriers will bond together Verizon, AT&T, Sprint will all slap T-Mobile with Binge on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Food for thought. T-Mobile reduces bandwidth for all video regardless of whether it is exempt from your cap or not.

 

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/12/t_mobile_s_binge_on_program_likely_violates_net_neutrality.html

 

I've seen a lot of people on Reddit complain about youtube buffering.  It's almost as if T-Mobile prioritizes speedtests over a good user experience. Why brag about 50+mb/s speedtests when Youtube is constantly buffering?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a lot of people on Reddit complain about youtube buffering. It's almost as if T-Mobile prioritizes speedtests over a good user experience. Why brag about 50+mb/s speedtests when Youtube is constantly buffering?

Exactly!

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought I would add these here just to reflect what the latest Rootmetric reports said about Houston and the greater Southeast Texas area.

 

4G LTE T-Mobile

 

And then HSPA+

 

Y'know, I think I heard something about a technology designed to subvert this whole load imbalance problem. What was it? I can't seem to remember.

 

Oh! I know! TDD-LTE!

 

:P

 

Edit: out of curiosity, is PCS or AWS standardized for TDD operation? Is it even possible to operate FDD and TDD in adjacent bands i.e. FDD in PCS A and TDD in PCS D?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Y'know, I think I heard something about a technology designed to subvert this whole load imbalance problem. What was it? I can't seem to remember.

 

Oh! I know! TDD-LTE!

 

[emoji14]

 

Edit: out of curiosity, is PCS or AWS standardized for TDD operation? Is it even possible to operate FDD and TDD in adjacent bands i.e. FDD in PCS A and TDD in PCS D?

No. FDD only.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's the slippery slope a lot of folks talked about with T-Mobile...

 

John Legere just wiped his ass with copies of the Net Neutrality Rule Book.

Wasn't this specifically stated as a BingeOn feature during the original announcement? I seem to remember that enabling BingeOn would cut video bandwidth down to one-third on services that were *technically* compatible, even if they weren't *officially* compatible, thereby allowing you to reduce your metered data usage.

 

The excess buffering is undoubtedly due to capacity issues on the backend of that service. This will likely clear up once YouTube is *officially* zero-rated, since (1) they will likely be able to pull lower-bitrate videos directly from Google rather than transcoding them, and (2) YouTube is one of the most-used video services, so the capacity freed up should be enough for other services.

 

Anyone who remembers performing the "speed hack" of zeroing the RTSP proxy can attest that Sprint has been doing the same for years. The reason that modification worked was because the proxy was congested. But unlike with T-Mobile, you can't turn it off without hacking your phone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The excess buffering is undoubtedly due to capacity issues on the backend of that service. This will likely clear up once YouTube is *officially* zero-rated, since (1) they will likely be able to pull lower-bitrate videos directly from Google rather than transcoding them, and (2) YouTube is one of the most-used video services, so the capacity freed up should be enough for other services.

T-Mobile does not transcode video, in fact they cannot do so with most video being delivered over SSL. Google definitely delivers YouTube video with SSL. The "video optimization" T-Mobile performs is essentially a variable throttle based on available network capacity which forces adaptive bitrate video to buffer and play lower quality streams. The issue with bingeon compatibility is inserting the tracking into the video packets so that T-Mobile can track what is video traffic and zero rate it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile does not transcode video, in fact they cannot do so with most video being delivered over SSL. Google definitely delivers YouTube video with SSL. The "video optimization" T-Mobile performs is essentially a variable throttle based on available network capacity which forces adaptive bitrate video to buffer and play lower quality streams. The issue with bingeon compatibility is inserting the tracking into the video packets so that T-Mobile can track what is video traffic and zero rate it.

With all that, isn't it going to be really hard to find a technical solution for Google to deliver zero-rated 480p video to T-Mobile?

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all that, isn't it going to be really hard to find a technical solution for Google to deliver zero-rated 480p video to T-Mobile?

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Some companies are sharing SSL certs with T-Mobile so they can view encrypted streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BingeOn has allowed me to binge on Netflix during my 1 hour commute. Please don't take it away!  :o  :unsure:  :td:  :td:  :td:  :td:  :td:  :td:

 

And as Robert has previously posted, that makes you an anti Net Neutrality enabler.  Are you proud or ashamed?

 

I do not traffic in emojis, use them sparingly.  But if I were to use the thumbs down emoji, you would get far more than the six dose that you post above.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if I stream Pandora on Music Freedom regardless of how I feel, does that make it enabling behavior? I would simply prefer T-Mobile offer bigger data buckets or all you can eat for a lower price than $95 a month.

 

That said it is unsurprising that something that greatly affects YouTube streaming quality would aggravate YouTube. They certainly want to protect their interests.

 

Edit: fixed Freudian slip

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...