Jump to content
dkyeager

Spark Coverage maps getting a makeover

Recommended Posts

Sprint appears to be redoing the B41 Coverage map on a city by city basis.  Much more realistic than prior version.   Slight exaggeration remains in a few local spots, but this is far far outweighed by B41 that is not shown.  http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=SJS:HE:Cov

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint appears to be redoing the B41 Coverage map on a city by city basis.  Much more realistic than prior version.   Slight exaggeration remains in a few local spots, but this is far far outweighed by B41 that is not shown.  http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=SJS:HE:Cov

We all know Sprint has a coverage map on there own page "http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=ATG:HE:Cov".... I did not see any difference at all, they need a new "coverage check" map period!! At&t and T-mobile are the only ones that did a major redo, I wish Sprint would too!! 

 

I do agree with you on the "Slight exaggeration" however I feel with the "orange" 4GLTE (1900/800) its WAY OVER exaggerated!!!!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks more accurate now in my market.  Before, it said I had Spark only a few miles away when the closest site was >15.  Their orange is definitely exaggerated, though. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I mentioned this elsewhere, but the map is now VERY accurate on where you can pick up 2600 in Charlotte, at least in my part of it. It still shows regular LTE in 3G-only zones though, but not as bad as it used to.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I mentioned this elsewhere, but the map is now VERY accurate on where you can pick up 2600 in Charlotte, at least in my part of it. It still shows regular LTE in 3G-only zones though, but not as bad as it used to.

 

Has Sprint started to optimize the Charlotte area since January 1st?  I looked at the map where I was over the holidays and it says the LTE signal should be fair with Turbo available.  I was lucky to have one bar of 3G signal inside and two bars of 3G outside.  I was not able to receive a LTE signal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has Sprint started to optimize the Charlotte area since January 1st? I looked at the map where I was over the holidays and it says the LTE signal should be fair with Turbo available. I was lucky to have one bar of 3G signal inside and two bars of 3G outside. I was not able to receive a LTE signal.

800 optimizations have begun (I noticed improvements in a couple of areas (in and around Matthews) in late December), but some areas are still spotty. What part of town was it in, if I may ask? I've been able to pick up 41 in all of the islands of turbo in the south Charlotte area (between Pineville and Matthews).

 

I still interpret "fair" LTE to mean frequent drops to 3G.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

800 optimizations have begun (I noticed improvements in a couple of areas (in and around Matthews) in late December), but some areas are still spotty. What part of town was it in, if I may ask? I've been able to pick up 41 in all of the islands of turbo in the south Charlotte area (between Pineville and Matthews).

 

I still interpret "fair" LTE to mean frequent drops to 3G.

 

I was in Concord close to Hwy 73 and I-85. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in Concord close to Hwy 73 and I-85. 

I don't travel up there much (when I do I'm usually going up 85 to Greensboro), but I do know Sprint could use some density improvement. As far as Turbo goes, there do appear to be some spots of it that don't agree with our maps. I will say that I have seen 41 stretch almost as far as needed to reach those patches though. Maybe they are still working on upping power levels. The 4 41 sites closest to me started with power levels turned way down (range was less than a mile) and then had them upped at some point in the past 25 or so days. Range is now comparable to 25 from the same towers as long as you are outdoors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint appears to be redoing the B41 Coverage map on a city by city basis.  Much more realistic than prior version.   Slight exaggeration remains in a few local spots, but this is far far outweighed by B41 that is not shown.  http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=SJS:HE:Cov

It also looks like LTE coverage shades have been fixed in areas as well! Tyler no longer has those extra spots southwest near palestine. I noticed it last night, but the b41 differences were not there yet.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't travel up there much (when I do I'm usually going up 85 to Greensboro), but I do know Sprint could use some density improvement. As far as Turbo goes, there do appear to be some spots of it that don't agree with our maps. I will say that I have seen 41 stretch almost as far as needed to reach those patches though. Maybe they are still working on upping power levels. The 4 41 sites closest to me started with power levels turned way down (range was less than a mile) and then had them upped at some point in the past 25 or so days. Range is now comparable to 25 from the same towers as long as you are outdoors.

 

The density at this time seems to be ok.  There is one b41 8t8r tower with b26 about 1 1/2 miles away and another b26 tower about 1 mile away from where I was staying.  I was able to receive b41 form the tower above when I could see the tower and no obstructions within eye site (300 to 400 yards).  I will be returning there in a couple of months so I hope that they will have it optimized and powered correctly by then.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They finally fixed the Florida coverage map. Looks way more accurate but it also shows how little Spark they have. Long way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They finally fixed the Florida coverage map. Looks way more accurate but it also shows how little Spark they have. Long way to go.

That is a huge difference from what it showed before! At least it's more accurate now. It also doesn't appear to be reflecting any new 8T8R installs in Clear - Ericsson markets, so at this point, there may actually be more Spark coverage than the maps show, rather than less like before. Some of the Samsung markets do seem to reflect some of the new 8T8Rs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Los Angeles appears to be updated. It's way more accurate now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Los Angeles appears to be updated. It's way more accurate now.

Which parts of Los Angeles?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats funny i just found on the maps.....

 

the wide view is ehhhh for band 41....

 

but when you go closer and it shows the turbo....those are right around the towers...

 

now tomorrow i have to go out by some ones i havent mapped yet, so ill double check....to see if they are live

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which parts of Los Angeles?

 

All parts from what I can tell.  I must have clicked on the maps a few minutes after they were updated.  The maps say updated 1/14/15.

 

(You have to zoom in to the level where you can see the differentiation between turbo and non-turbo.)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Los Angeles the map is also showing coverage from 8T8R sites.

 

Now if they could only make the window bigger than a postage stamp...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there really a difference between turbo and regular spark? I checked the map for my area and I'm in a turbo location. I'm glad they are making right the map but if they want to really make it right just redesign the whole map and get it out that block window it's been in for years and years.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there really a difference between turbo and regular spark? I checked the map for my area and I'm in a turbo location. I'm glad they are making right the map but if they want to really make it right just redesign the whole map and get it out that block window it's been in for years and years.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Turbo is probably where you'll hit peak speeds at, and regular spark is just B41 coverage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All parts from what I can tell.  I must have clicked on the maps a few minutes after they were updated.  The maps say updated 1/14/15.

 

(You have to zoom in to the level where you can see the differentiation between turbo and non-turbo.)

You can ignore the "update" date, it just shows today no matter if the map has actually been updated or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there really a difference between turbo and regular spark? I checked the map for my area and I'm in a turbo location. I'm glad they are making right the map but if they want to really make it right just redesign the whole map and get it out that block window it's been in for years and years.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We have a thread for this question: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6720-spark-v-spark-turbo/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am under the Turbo area on the map and I don't get anything higher than 10-15Mbps on Clearwire B41. :P My area needs B26 optimization badly, there are a few locations that have great B25/B41 outside but inside is 3G only. You will find yourself occasionally connecting to B26/B41 but you don't stay on it for more than a few seconds as the signal is terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbo is probably where you'll hit peak speeds at, and regular spark is just B41 coverage.

 

I hate the label of Spark Turbo in addition to Sprint Spark and 4G LTE.  There is enough confusion already as it is.  Just have the Sprint Spark and 4G LTE labels and it gives the customer enough information on what to expect.  Its unnecessary to single out the specific towers that have upgraded backhaul to support 8T8R because to be honest even a 2T2R B41 LTE site upgraded is already faster than a B25 or B26 LTE carrier and can be proven via a speedtest.  

 

Also I will continue to say this that Sprint really needs to completely revamp their coverage maps.  I don't like that tiny ass rectangle and have to constantly scroll in order to see any decent amount of area.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate the label of Spark Turbo in addition to Sprint Spark and 4G LTE.  There is enough confusion already as it is.  Just have the Sprint Spark and 4G LTE labels and it gives the customer enough information on what to expect.  Its unnecessary to single out the specific towers that have upgraded backhaul to support 8T8R because to be honest even a 2T2R B41 LTE site upgraded is already faster than a B25 or B26 LTE carrier and can be proven via a speedtest.  

 

Also I will continue to say this that Sprint really needs to completely revamp their coverage maps.  I don't like that tiny ass rectangle and have to constantly scroll in order to see any decent amount of area.

I couldn't agree with you more on all points!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By lilotimz
      Ericsson RRUS82 2.5 GHz 8T8R
      Now being found in Ericsson vendor territory, these augment the existing Nokia Flexi 2.5 8T8R radios in place.



      Photo Credits: mdob07
       
    • By jakeuten
      Just a bit of insight. I live near UMD in Duluth, MN. Sprint's signal is clearly much 'dirtier' with a 1.0 SNR compared to T-Mobile's 20.4 SNR. I don't have a screenshot from the same time, but I get about a 22 to 29 SNR with T. I know that AT&T uses RRU's but I'm not too sure about Sprint or T-Mobile. Also, I didn't even know they had L2500 where I live, but I force checked it on my Samsung S7 (AT&T). 


    • By S4GRU
      Did you know that with many Sprint (Uniband) LTE Android devices, the signal strength indicator at the top does not show your LTE signal strength? Even if 4G or LTE is displayed next to it?
       
      That's right!  This signal displayed here is your 1x (voice signal), and it is not your 3G EVDO signal strength, nor your LTE signal strength.  Regardless of whether it says 3G or 4G next to it. This is the cause of a lot of confusion.  Also, third party apps like NetMonitor do not show accurate LTE signal strengths. They also only show the 1x signal strength, even though they may reference being connected to LTE.
      The purpose of this thread is to help educate the masses, because many people think they have a strong LTE signal, when in fact they do not. And then they are unhappy, thinking that Sprint LTE is really slow, even with a strong signal. LTE performance is very signal strength dependent. So, when you have a weak signal, you can expect much slower than peak results.
       
      There is only one accurate way to get your LTE signal strength, and that is from your LTE Engineering screen in your Debug menu. And we will discuss the different ways to get that below.
       
      ...In HTC, Motorola & LG Sprint LTE devices:
      Go in to your phone app, and dial ##DEBUG# Select LTE Engineering Go down to RSRP. The number under RSRP shown in dBm is your LTE signal strength. ...In Samsung Sprint LTE devices:
      Go in to your phone app, and dial ##DEBUG# Enter 777468 for your lock code Select LTE Engineering Go down to RSRP. The number next to RSRP shown in dBm is your LTE signal strength. ...In the Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 5:
      Go in to your phone app, and dial *#*#DEBUG#*#* Enter 777468 for your lock code Select LTE Engineering Go down to RSRP. The number next to RSRP shown in dBm is your LTE signal strength. The LTE Signal Strength Scale:
       
      Now you have determined your actual LTE signal strength in dBms your device is receiving, you can use the following scale below to determine its strength:
      Better than -88dBm RSRP is a strong signal Between -89dBm and -96dBm is a very good signal Between -97dBm and -105dBm is good Between -106dBm and -112dBm is fair Worse than -113dBm RSRP is poor Feel free to link people to this thread for explanation. Hopefully, this will clear up some confusion out there!
       
       
    • By antilamr
      Some history first;
      Been through all the highs & broken promise Lows over the last 18 years with Sprint, currently have 7 lines. My main areas of concern are where I live and my retirement cabin which are in a semi Sprint dead zones.
      My Note3 will hold onto 3g for dear life. I have to toggle airplane mode to return to LTE signal (while standing in my back yard). Once I enter the house it drops to 3g. Speed test at 4g is slow at best.
      In my front yard it's 3g unless I walk into the center of the street, togle airplane mode then can pick up SLOW 4g again(until I walk to my front door.) i know note3 is missing band 41 which is suposto help.
      The wife's Iphone6 is 3g in my front yard, lte in the middle of the street and drops to 3g when entering our house also. When on 3g and walking into the back yard, airplane mode to froce it to 4g and it sticks to lte once you enter the house again. 1 to 2 bars, 17mb down with 1.3mb up. It will hold onto the lte signal.
      Does anyone have any insight to what I should expect with a Note5? Sprint has programed the system so if our 3g signal is stronger, my phone will want to stay there, Will carrier aggregation solve this problem or will the Note 5 try and hang onto the stronger 3g signal at all costs?
      I'm able to pre order the Note5 for $249 with a $200 SAMSUNG REBATE. Hate to get all excited and sign on for another 2 years if the Note5 will be doing what the note3 is doing. I get the whole ehrpd and 3g improving the cell phone experiance. At this point im more interested in being able to use more than the 5mb per month my 7 phones average and finally be able to use some of the unlimited data I've been paying for over the last 18 years. I'm in West Orange County, CA. and travel to the SAN Bernardino mountains weekly. Experts please chime in. On the fence to switch carriers but want Sprint to suceed and be there when they do!
  • Posts

    • I need to rebuild a couple maps. I just usually take pictures and poast those. I am busy and unorganized so I could care less to sort a bunch of site data from the master map and copy paste again, or match GPS to a site and harvest from there. Have you guys found a way to automate something like SCP log sorting, what would be required to do this when starting fresh?  
    • Currently 13. Since I control the code though, I can add more if/when needed. 
    • On a capital raised basis Sprint does not look bankrupt at all.  The number of site improvements doing since the merger was announced is astounding.  Most of the sites in my market have been touched, most Clear sites tribanded, new sites made, small cells multiplied, Massive MIMO installed in dozens of places with more permits added just a few weeks ago.  They have more macro sites in my market than T-Mobile, a ton of small cells where T-Mobile has almost none.  Yet this work does not show in root metrics.  RF engineers from other firms have all said Sprint is short of backhaul as their key problem.  They blame management, which I believe is the key reason Masa wants this merger.
    • Bankruptcy is a business tool.  Sprint's biggest problem is its debt load. Bankruptcy was a real possibility when Masa first got involved. Another option would be to sell Boost.  This dragged on merger has cost Sprint in terms of reputation.  A big time advertising campaign would be required to explain what they have been doing to the network. The key issue to tackle would be backhaul which would come out of operating thus P&L.  Sprint needs a Cricket type solution -- pay for the maximum speed you want.
    • How many different icon choices?  
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...