Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I live in Virginia and you will not see Charter here in the Commonwealth, it is mostly Comcast, Cox, Verizon Fios, maybe some AT&T here and there, but no Charter. So the question stands.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

What?  Charter is in newport news, norfolk and portmouth and i think that is even before they have migrated over the newly purchased Time warner assets.  TW has stores in abingdon, herndon and richlands, va.  most cable companies do not put random stores into areas where there is no service.  they wouldnt get much foot traffic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BT-AC106_CHARTE_16U_20150528094340.jpg

 

This is the combined company's combined coax footprint.

 

I wish these cable/wireless mergers would stop for the sake of competition, but I will say that TWC subscriber-access "public" wifi covers virtually every public Sprint indoor deadzone in my immediate area and it would be sweet if Sprint subs got access to that wifi.

 

Edit: and here's a population density map since that gives some more meaning to the data.

US%20Population%20density,%202010.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You speaking of RoadRunner which was split off from Time Warner, and I'm in the Herndon area where Cox dominates.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

Charter purchased the cable assets of Time Warner and Brighthouse.  Road runner was just a brand name for TWs high speed internet that they dropped a couple of years ago.  Charter has all of Time warners residential and business class cable and internet accounts and networks now.  Regardless, Charter also has a few spots in virginia that they have had all along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain why combining with Charter would help Sprint. Most Sprint customers do not live anywhere near Charter.

Who said anything about "helping"? If a move like that does happen, it won't be to help Sprint, but more to line Charter shareholder's pockets.

 

But I doubt something like this happens. If this were an office pool, my money is on SoftBank buying T-Mobile and finally shutting down the Sprint HQ. Sprint hasn't been successfully run in a very long time and T-Mobile has been the flavor of the month for a very long time. Also shorter flights between Japan and Seattle.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I proposed was that Verizon and Dish Merge nd then TMobile and Sprint merge. Then T-Mobile/Sprint go into a partnership with the cable cos where cable cos video offerings get zero rated in return for reduced prices for backhaul/fronthaul and cable hotspot roaming. Maybe even combined cable modems/wifi/LTE hotspots with seamless voice handoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain why combining with Charter would help Sprint.   Most Sprint  customers do not live anywhere near Charter.

 

 

I live in Virginia and you will not see Charter here in the Commonwealth, it is mostly Comcast, Cox, Verizon Fios, maybe some AT&T here and there, but no Charter. So the question stands. Charter isn't all that big here.

 

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

This is an example of using your local experience and thinking it applies to the rest of the country... Charter has a reasonably large presence in the Midwest, the Southeast, and in the West as you can see in the map above. Many of the viewers of my station get their signal through Charter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example for which one you didn't think of. Directv which is now owned by AT&T, blankets the whole country but you didn't think about that one did you. Cable systems operate by County and city contracts, not by state. And Charter does not blanket the South East, Mid West, or South West. The biggest cable operator is still Comcast which covers more then Charter does

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example for which one you didn't think of. Directv which is now owned by AT&T, blankets the whole country but you didn't think about that one did you. Cable systems operate by County and city contracts, not by state. And Charter does not blanket the South East, Mid West, or South West. The biggest cable operator is still Comcast which covers more then Charter does

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

I did not suggest that they had nationwide coverage, nor that they are bigger than Comcast or "blanket" any particular area.. If you read what I posted, I was simply stating that just because they are not in your area does not mean they are not within Sprint's footprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BT-AC106_CHARTE_16U_20150528094340.jpg

 

This is the combined company's combined coax footprint.

I don't know what that map depicts, but it definitely isn't their coax footprint. Take a look at southeast Louisiana which is majorly Cox Communications territory. They do have a fiber transport partnership with Cox, so maybe that's why Cox territories are depicted.

 

Here's an alternative map:

 

new-charter-foot-print.png

 

Source

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The prizes will again be snatched by those with the deepest pockets. Imagine Verizon buying Dish and keeping all of Dish's spectrum- and then imagine them taking a run at the remaining regionals and then comcast. The sky is the limit, much like the era when the big two gobbled up all of the low band spectrum

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't be hysterical. All net neutrality is a fight between content providers and infrastructure companies on who gets what profits.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example for which one you didn't think of. Directv which is now owned by AT&T, blankets the whole country but you didn't think about that one did you. Cable systems operate by County and city contracts, not by state.

Ever heard of a little conglomerate called SoftBank? They own or have stake in several diverse companies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what that map depicts, but it definitely isn't their coax footprint. Take a look at southeast Louisiana which is majorly Cox Communications territory. They do have a fiber transport partnership with Cox, so maybe that's why Cox territories are depicted.

 

Here's an alternative map:

 

new-charter-foot-print.png

 

Source

Hmm. I think my map might just be showing any MSA that the cable co offers service in. So yes your map is more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the forums down?

 

It wouldn't let me view unless I signed in.

 

Not down.  We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic.  We are having a run on guest traffic lately.  We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not down. We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic. We are having a run on guest traffic lately. We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

It's probably Marcelo trying to get ideas and your blocking him. ????????????

 

Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not down.  We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic.  We are having a run on guest traffic lately.  We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

 

It's probably Marcelo trying to get ideas and your blocking him.

 

Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

Im curious to know how many IP's originate from Sprint HQ.  :secret:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not down. We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic. We are having a run on guest traffic lately. We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

I wonder if the Tidal purchase caused that much of a spike on Sprint searches that it lead people to S4GRU?
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • If so, I'm wanting to see if any others of you have been having intermittent internet issues.   The last week or two, internet just seems to intermittently stop/pause for various periods of time....when the halt/pause lets up throughput will seem normal/very snappy as you'd expect on a 1 Gig line, until its not again.  My desk with both personal PC and work laptop are in our basement with a Cat 6 run straight from the Verizon router.  I've mostly noted it when trying to go through and clean out mail from my hotmail account I've had a few decades now (to be clear off that mention, I don't have decades worth of mail pending ha - like 100-200 unreads max if that each time I go through them), but I know its not something relegated to only the outlook.live.com endpoint because I check other tabs/sites when the issues crop up and they're hanging/spinning too. I've not yet tried calling VZ tech support and wanted to check/poll for others here to see if anyone using the service might have been wrestling with similar issues.   Addendum:  Both the ONT box (in our living room, not outside) and the white standup VZ router have been cycled before a couple times.  Have also tried changing between ethernet ports on the back for the Cat 6 cable with no change over long term behavior.
    • Same here, haven't had a single issue with RCS
    • Mapped two n41 small cell sin Jersey City today. They're the first two to be mapped there in Jersey City as far as I can tell and interestingly they're consecutive gNBs, possibly indicating they were installed around the same time. gNB 1088335 appears to be an upgrade of an older small cell. It looks identical to the T-Mobile n41 small cell I mapped earlier this year in Old Westbury.   I also mapped gNB 1088334 in Newport. This small cell appears to be a new build as I couldn't find any evidence of an older small cell in that area. Unfortunately no pic of it since I didn't even notice that I mapped it until I got home and I can't find it in Streetview.
    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...