Jump to content

Sanyo M1

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    LG Nexus 5
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    MN
  • Here for...
    4G Information

Sanyo M1's Achievements

Member Level:  1x Advanced

Member Level: 1x Advanced (7/12)

61

Reputation

  1. Pretty sure the issue was that it was characterizing incompatible fast wireless charging as charging fast before the update. This is because Google uses a proprietary fast charging method instead of what Samsung and others use. With the update it's showing the correct charging.
  2. 2nd-4th results are Band 41 3rd carrier from yesterday. But that's not normal, and could really just be the test server. But, I've never had that high pings with any server before. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
  3. I also noticed the same on Band 41 in Minnesota yesterday. Consistent pings above 105. Maybe it's related.
  4. That screen shot is two blocks from the tower on I-90. Have yet to connect to Band 41 on the other tower in town. Maybe you're right, I should. But given how it took them 1.5 years to actually get any LTE in Austin, I'm not holding my breath. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
  5. Lol, yeah trolling. Austin, MN is perfect example of the two blocks of Band 41. Literally only get Band 41 on north side of town if outside and for a few blocks. Specifically this area: http://imgur.com/a/IUpE4 Though where there is density, e.g. downtown Minneapolis, it's fine.
  6. Its not even a population density thing. Areas by Northfield, Faribault, Shakopee, all have severe issues with LTE, 1X is all over the place. Don't even get me started on Mankato. If you went just off the coverage maps (yes, even accounting for "fair" coverage), you'd be sorely disappointed in how often you're on LTE.
  7. Pretty much anything south of Jordan. Fairmont area is a complete joke. I90 as well. Mankato is completely crippled. Going on 14 past Eagle Lake is just 1x majority of the time. Austin has both towers with dual carrier band 41, and worth nothing, only get them outside. Faribault/waterville areas are just LTE islands even with all having band 26. I can go on and on. It's disappointing, not even evdo, but straight 1x most of the time. Great service at work is promising. I would describe Sprint in majority of Minnesota as what others deride T-Mobile as, islands of LTE. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
  8. Safe to say, Sprint outside of Minneapolis + suburbs is extremely disappointing. Can't even stream Google Music most of the time without it buffering. It really is islands of LTE.
  9. This is typical in Mankato everywhere now. And yeah very surprised, don't know why they stopped at St. Peter for Band 41. Especially given Mankato is a relatively huge college town. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
  10. Mankato back to 3G speeds with full bars. How disappointing. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
  11. Honestly, outside of the cities and maybe suburbs, I don't see any expansion happening. Not in the foreseeable future anyways. I-90 coverage is so pathetic. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
  12. Yeah, same on 169 from Mankato to intersection of 169 and 494. Thought this was supposed to be Sprint's better market. But, so far I'm not impressed. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...