Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

That's a good point. Indeed I am.

 

So what's Sprint supposed to do? Go barebones for the foreseeable future until it either merges with T-Mobile, gets bought out by someone else, or declares bankruptcy?

 

Where's Sprint left standing once the network densification project is completed?

 

Once upon a time a certain European mega telecom also didn't pour money into their American investment and let it flounder for a while. 

 

Long history short, said American investment became a very good investment with the right leadership, vision, and execution and the funding and support came.

 

I wager that Softbank will do the same thing as that certain European telecom entity if their American investment (Sprint) shows promise. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's double entry bookkeeping. Softbank gives Sprint money, you debit cash and credit... owners equity. I don't believe Softbank can own a larger stake in Sprint without taking it private and possibly running afoul of regulators.

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S7

 

 

The original merger prospectus has a provision which outlines what SoftBank would have to pay for the remaining Sprint shares if its ownership stake in Sprint exceeds 85%:

 

Mandatory Offer to Purchase. The New Sprint certificate of incorporation as in effect at the effective time of the SoftBank Merger will provide that, in the event that the combined voting interest of SoftBank and its controlled affiliates in New Sprint exceeds 85% of the outstanding voting securities of New Sprint, then SoftBank or a controlled affiliate will make an offer to acquire all the remaining shares of New Sprint common stock at a price not less than the volume-weighted average closing price of New Sprint common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding such offer.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arm is somewhat a profitable entity with a good positive reputation. Sprint...eh not so much.

 

Remember Softbank did try to sell Sprint and would have if there were any takers (there are none).

 

 

Actually false, Son said "he thought" about it, he didn't really put it on the table officially

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original merger prospectus has a provision which outlines what SoftBank would have to pay for the remaining Sprint shares if its ownership stake in Sprint exceeds 85%:

Thank you. I remembered that there was some proviso that effectively capped their percentage of ownership.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I want Sprint to succeed, I'm definitely not shy to criticize it for its misdoings. However, I'm generally more critical of Softbank's handling of Sprint, than I am of Sprint itself. I see Sprint having some great opportunities, though its going to take a lot of money to help bring Sprint back to being successful, by increasing network density and perhaps even low-band in the 600mhz spectrum.

 

Softbank spending billions for ARM definitely seems like a major rejection of Sprint to me. All that money could be going to Sprint, to which would help Spring greatly, if the money went to the right projects, namely NGN. Paying off Sprint debt would be good too, though I still prefer network investments, mostly in site development. Recently when Arora left, I thought this would mean more progress for Sprint. Yet, this bit of news doesn't make that seem so promising to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I want Sprint to succeed, I'm definitely not shy to criticize it for its misdoings. However, I'm generally more critical of Softbank's handling of Sprint, than I am of Sprint itself. I see Sprint having some great opportunities, though its going to take a lot of money to help bring Sprint back to being successful, by increasing network density and perhaps even low-band in the 600mhz spectrum.

 

Softbank spending billions for ARM definitely seems like a major rejection of Sprint to me. All that money could be going to Sprint, to which would help Spring greatly, if the money went to the right projects, namely NGN. Paying off Sprint debt would be good too, though I still prefer network investments, mostly in site development. Recently when Arora left, I thought this would mean more progress for Sprint. Yet, this bit of news doesn't make that seem so promising to me.

Let's see how the stock market reacts today.  Aurora's departure and SoftBank's recent asset sales had given hope to Sprint shareholders about more help on the way.  That assumption may now be false.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arm is somewhat a profitable entity with a good positive reputation. Sprint...eh not so much.

 

Remember Softbank did try to sell Sprint and would have if there were any takers (there are none).

 

 

 

We are all so sprint happy that most of us forgot that. Yes sprint is moving forward but not at the pace it would if son was really behind his words 100%. They say what we want to hear but aren't acting nearly as aggressive as they could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually false, Son said "he thought" about it, he didn't really put it on the table officially

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

That's saying we never came to a formal agreement to put on paper.

 

What's to think about if you're the one making the pitch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until Sprint start adding real, numbers like 500k Postpaid phones adds and 100k prepaid Softbank will continue to see it as a dead corse walking around. Also why Softbank wants to to pay Sprint 33 billions debt in a saturated market. 

 

Rumors has it that Softbank really wanted to buy a mega wireless carrier Vodafone but since it has a, huge market cap it was outside of their reach. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, with the exception of Intel, most mobile processors for phones and tablets are ARM based, that includes Apple, Samsung's Exynos, Meitek and numerous others. Oh and Qualcomm. The British government is loving this because of foreign investment. The EU really doesn't have a say in this not will they be able to put any conditions on it.

 

Funny thing is I see a lot of people becoming butt hurt assuming what Softbank was freeing up cash for and finding out it was for something else jumping to conclusions and now lashing out because there armchair CEO status caught them with the pants down.

 

It is what it is and no matter how much you want something to be, unless you were part of the planning process, you don't know a thing until it happens.

 

Well so much for the dreaming and back into reality.

 

And here is a little something I read this morning.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3988973-sprint-corp-bonds-likely-outperform-stock-h216

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, with the exception of Intel, most mobile processors for phones and tablets are ARM based, that includes Apple, Samsung's Exynos, Meitek and numerous others. Oh and Qualcomm. The British government is loving this because of foreign investment. The EU really doesn't have a say in this not will they be able to put any conditions on it.

 

Funny thing is I see a lot of people becoming butt hurt assuming what Softbank was freeing up cash for and finding out it was for something else jumping to conclusions and now lashing out because there armchair CEO status caught them with the pants down.

 

It is what it is and no matter how much you want something to be, unless you were part of the planning process, you don't know a thing until it happens.

 

Well so much for the dreaming and back into reality.

 

And here is a little something I read this morning.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3988973-sprint-corp-bonds-likely-outperform-stock-h216

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

 

You hit the nail on its head with the fact that many are sour on Sprint because they were expecting Softbank to start pouring in Billions after the recent assets sale. 

 

It was a foolish thought from the beginning. It makes no sense for Softbank to pour money into Sprint when it doesn't need it. Softbank has already set up financing vehicles for Sprint.  1st quarter earnings is only one week away.  Everyone knows it will be positive, the question is how large of a positive. 

 

I expect 100-300 in positive net income on revenue of 8.0 to 8.2 Billion. 200 net phone adds. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping that SoftBank would actually put some money in Sprint but so far Sprint is being self financed, as in debt financed. Oh well, they need to tighten their belts, which means that they have to let some people go in KC (sorry AJ), become efficient and enterpreunial and fight hard for every customer. Not to mention execute on the network side where they have failed miserably.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's stock price dropped sharply but it seems as though it's climbing back up slowly again. We'll have to see how it performs over the next week or so.

 

Sprint has its Fiscal 2016 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call on July 25th. I'm sure this SoftBank transaction will come up in the Q&A.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a Reddit person so I decided to give it a try today. I search for each carriers forums and I get to the tmobile forum and I see a topic when sprint goes bankrupt....I just closed out the app and deleted it. Can someone please explain to me as to why T-Mobile diehards are so pressed on Sprint going out of business? They fail to realize if Sprint goes T-Mobile is pretty much over as well. They keep each other afloat.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a Reddit person so I decided to give it a try today. I search for each carriers forums and I get to the tmobile forum and I see a topic when sprint goes bankrupt....I just closed out the app and deleted it. Can someone please explain to me as to why T-Mobile diehards are so pressed on Sprint going out of business? They fail to realize if Sprint goes T-Mobile is pretty much over as well. They keep each other afloat.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

Tunnel vision, they're so blind to see if Sprint goes out of business there'll only be three major national carriers causing price hikes. Almost no competition

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tunnel vision, they're so blind to see if Sprint goes out of business there'll only be three major national carriers causing price hikes. Almost no competition

True and that free party will be over. I do commend all that T-Mobile has accomplished in such a short time but it has never sat right with me almost like its a prep and prime to be sold off. But seeing that topic I just rolled my eyes because it's a obsession in Tmo land.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a Reddit person so I decided to give it a try today. I search for each carriers forums and I get to the tmobile forum and I see a topic when sprint goes bankrupt....I just closed out the app and deleted it. Can someone please explain to me as to why T-Mobile diehards are so pressed on Sprint going out of business? They fail to realize if Sprint goes T-Mobile is pretty much over as well. They keep each other afloat.

 

The T-Mobile fanboys view this like a sports competition.  "Your team was eliminated.  Ha ha.  That means my team is better than your team."  It gives them an illusory feeling of superiority.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
    • I found a multi-carrier oDAS node at the corner of Bushwick Ave & Cedar St. You can see an upgraded Verizon macro deployment behind the node, and T-Mobile has a fully upgraded site only a block away. So, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an AT&T node with LTE+mmWave (or maybe C-Band).
    • I tried going into a Boost Mobile store and they wouldn't sell me a rainbow SIM card, said that it would be dead as soon as I put it in the Moto Edge 2023... which I know is bs... 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...