Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Basically what AJ trying to tell you is there is a big difference between the base station throwing out 50 watts and you receiving it and your phone maybe throwing out 50 milliwatts and the base station receiving you.

 

And the situation would be a lot better if the handset antenna could beamform those 50 mW directly at the fixed base station antenna.  But with current technology, that just is not feasible -- because of handset size and mobility.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note 5 is an RF monster, just saying...

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Yeah.. I was really quite surprised how much better the Note 5 is compared to the Note 4

with my usage patterns..here is Vegas land we have a lot of B41 Squared and the few speedtests

that I've allowed for myself have consistently been in the high 80's and a couple in the 90's for

CA; for non-CA the Note5 seems to grab and hold B41 better than the Note 4 ever did and rsrp

values seem anywhere from 5 -10% better for the few times I've compared them side by side..certainly 

anecdotal evidence compared to AJ's report but just saying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah.. I was really quite surprised how much better the Note 5 is compared to the Note 4

with my usage patterns..here is Vegas land we have a lot of B41 Squared and the few speedtests

that I've allowed for myself have consistently been in the high 80's and a couple in the 90's for

CA; for non-CA the Note5 seems to grab and hold B41 better than the Note 4 ever did and rsrp

values seem anywhere from 5 -10% better for the few times I've compared them side by side..certainly 

anecdotal evidence compared to AJ's report but just saying...

 

And that is all downlink, not uplink.  The anecdotal experience tells us nothing about the uplink, while all FCC lab tested figures are uplink, not downlink.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is some good news for Terrell and other in the Orlando area :

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/sprint-gets-first-win-network-193043878.html

 

Sprint won in reliability, which is very good!

 

I'd imagine things will improve further once the remaining WiMAX Network is finally shut down in Orlando (and other cities across the country), the last day of service being 3/31/2016. WiMAX Shutdown Schedule

 

FL: Daytona Beach, Miami, Orlando, Tampa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine things will improve further once the remaining WiMAX Network is finally shut down in Orlando (and other cities across the country), the last day of service being 3/31/2016. WiMAX Shutdown Schedule

 

FL: Daytona Beach, Miami, Orlando, Tampa

 

I added a few extra links to my post, though I meant for the last one to show as an image. I've had trouble doing this before, so if anyone could help me figure out how to have a link appear as an image, please inform me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Sprint is really on there game in Orlando its very good and able to keep up with At&t and better than tmobile. Verizon has small cells all over the place so they are still the best but Sprint is closing in. I like seeing news like this.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting reads. How's LTE at the Disney Properties these days?

 

It's gotten better...ATT is king and provides service for Disney Co. Verizon/Tmo/Sprint all have dead zones in places...while ATT has solid coverage. It's interesting because Nextel used o have the Disney Co contract, but that never carried over to coverage for Sprint users.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint just kicked off a new sweepstakes:

 

Sprint Invites Customers to Join ‘Across the Nation Celebration’ Sweepstakes

 

Visit https://www.sprint.com/sprintnationsweeps to enter.

 

Interesting they're giving away the same car they use for Direct 2 You.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also posted this in the LG G5 rumors thread - looks like LG will be selling an unlocked G5 compatible with both GSM and CDMA.  I'd like to see more manufacturers do this (similar to iPhone, Nexus devices, and Moto X Pure).

 

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/lg-brings-an-unlocked-version-of-the-g5-its-first-ever-modular-smartphone-to-b-h-2107323.htm

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also posted this in the LG G5 rumors thread - looks like LG will be selling an unlocked G5 compatible with both GSM and CDMA.  I'd like to see more manufacturers do this (similar to iPhone, Nexus devices, and Moto X Pure).

 

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/lg-brings-an-unlocked-version-of-the-g5-its-first-ever-modular-smartphone-to-b-h-2107323.htm

 

avb, could you find out if the unlocked version B&H is selling works on all of AT&T's newer band frequencies? I might consider getting it, if it does, through B&H, instead of through T-Mobile, in case I ever have to switch from T-Mobile to AT&T, and would rather not have to get a new device then.

 

I just heard the information about T-Mobile's LG G5 release date today from TmoNews, yet no word from our Executive Response contact at T-Mobile. I'm going to give it until Tuesday or Wednesday of next week to hear from her, otherwise I may have to switch anyways, as I'm suppose to be getting an advance on the pre-order, due to issues I had trying to get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would make sense that they use a Chrysler/Fiat product since their hotspot service is Sprint 3G.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon finally felt the need to attack Sprint directly.

http://www.cnet.com/news/verizon-gets-ricky-gervais-to-make-jokes-about-sprint/

 

I think they tested Sprint after the second carrier came online at there home HQ of NYC and realized the inevitable...Sprint is the first true threat in a while.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon finally felt the need to attack Sprint directly.http://www.cnet.com/news/verizon-gets-ricky-gervais-to-make-jokes-about-sprint/

I think they tested Sprint after the second carrier came online at there home HQ of NYC and realized the inevitable...Sprint is the first true threat in a while.

In metros, true sprint will smoke them. The question is will Sprint expand their native coverage without relying on roaming partners.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In metros, true sprint will smoke them. The question is will Sprint expand their native coverage without relying on roaming partners.

After filling in the gaps, I'm sure that's the intent. But them having roaming partners that act as native footprint is a great stopgap.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In metros, true sprint will smoke them. The question is will Sprint expand their native coverage without relying on roaming partners.

I don't care if they rely on roaming. As long as it is high speed and has a decent amount.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon finally felt the need to attack Sprint directly.

http://www.cnet.com/news/verizon-gets-ricky-gervais-to-make-jokes-about-sprint/

 

I think they tested Sprint after the second carrier came online at there home HQ of NYC and realized the inevitable...Sprint is the first true threat in a while.

YAY!! Sprint finally got a personal attack that means they are doing something right!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

YAY!! Sprint finally got a personal attack that means they are doing something right!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And by Verizon! Sprint should feel honored!
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...