Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

I feel bad for iWireless if this deal goes through. They're a T-Mobile affiliate and would be left in the cold if this deal went through. Unless the death Star gobbles them up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't give a damn about tweets. Unless I see changes, then it doesn't matter how many stupid tweets or profane statements Legere makes... I would never switch.

 

I want change, and sprint is providing it at an accelerating rate. I can't ask for any more.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

^^^ What he said. Talk is cheap. People want to see actual results. Not just B.S..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks to avoid this thread getting further sidetracked, all Comcast sharing wi-fi posts have been placed in its own thread here

 

Lets try to keep this one just about the Sprint - T-Mobile offer.

 

TS

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tmo/sprint could be the biggest thing of the year... The longer it takes to announce the more I think sprint is actually taking time to do it the right in all places of the deal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't feel like creating a new topic for this but AT&T and T-Mobile are swapping spectrum in 10 states. It's AWS for PCS.


http://www.tmonews.com/2014/07/t-mo-att-to-swap-spectrum-in-a-number-of-markets/

 

 



AWS highlights from AT&T-Leap divestitures:

AWS Bonus:

PCS highlights:

Cons:


  •  


    CMA 448 Kentucky 6 – Madison (reduced from 20 to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F

     

    • CMA101 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA109 Spokane, WA (path to 20 MHz FDD LTE on AWS D+E+F)
    •  
    • CMA112 Corpus Christi, TX (path to 20 MHz FDD LTE on AWS D+E+F)
    •  
    • CMA128 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA162 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA432 Kansas 5 – Brown [some counties] (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS C+D+E)
    •  
    • CMA340 California 5 – San Luis Obispo (path to 20 MHz FDD LTE on AWS D+E+F)
    •  
    • CMA661 Texas 10 – Navarro (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA340 California 5 – San Luis Obispo (upgrade from 15 to 20 MHz of PCS)
    •  
    • I won’t detail the rest of the PCS spectrum swaps, but overall T-Mobile gave up PCS where they had more than 30 MHz (to potentially run DC-HSPA+ and GSM) except in parts of Lousiana where they dropped to 20 MHz PCS (they can still run DC-HSPA+ and GSM using NSN narrow WCDMA)
    •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't feel like creating a new topic for this but AT&T and T-Mobile are swapping spectra in 10 states. It's AWS for PCS.

 

Please cite your source.  It is bad form to copy and paste someone else's work -- without at least a link to the original.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please cite your source.  It is bad form to copy and paste someone else's work -- without at least a link to the original.

 

AJ

 

http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1841022-T-Mobile-to-pick-up-most-of-AT-amp-T-Leap-spectrum-divestitures

 

and just for you AJ:

 

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=647463878&attachmentKey=19406490&attachmentInd=applAttach

 

pages 12-18

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Do you think I had not already located that very application within three minutes of reading Paynefanbro's post?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think I had not already located that very application within three minutes of reading Paynefanbro's post?

 

;)

 

AJ

It took you three minutes. Frankly I am disappointed, AJ :P !

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I remember reading on the topic of the FCC approval; it has to do with spectrum holdings. Can't site it, but I did read it on s4. Basically its been thrown down that in order to have any chance in future auctions and or merger sprint would have to let go in an agreement "spectrum". Now i'm not sure if this would be doable by lets saying T-mobile letting there 1700 go? leaving them to there 1900 / recent 700 holding? This would then allow them to later bid for 600mhz I'd assume on a equal playing field unless wheeler made a decision against that. 

 

Also the other group that would have to approve this is the DOJ... They would have a side with the FCC with what ever they decide to run with. However, they would also probably throw down the combining of the two companies as an issue, leading to a potential monopoly (even though it wouldn't).  So not sure how Son plans to counter that honestly, but the FCC seems the easier fix of the two. lol

 

 

No spectrum needs to be divested in the TMUS/S deal. The solution is to get DISH involved.

Let DISH to use Sprint/TMUS combined network to form an MNVO company owned by both DISH and combined TMUS/S. This company will provide wireless broadband including fixed-LTE for home broadband users. Assign the at least 60 spectrum into the new company then FCC can shut up.

 

The COMCAST/TWC deal will make the home broadband market be controlled by ATT/VZ/COMCAST after that. So FCC will have no argument if they want more competition while they want to block S and DISH to add competition in broadband market.

 

And if FCC block S/DISH to swallow TMUS, then they should also kill COMCAST/TWC deal and ATT/DTV deal for same reason. So ATT/DTV/COMCAST/TWC won't send letters to FCC against SOFTBANK. Then VERIZON just swallowed cincinnati bell, and FCC still needs to approve it. So Softbank won't have any major players in the industry against the deal.

 

But DISH is hard to sell itself. So S is playing with TMUS first to get DISH on board with lower cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel the majority of people that switch are the people that would switch right back to sprint if someone told them sprints service had greatly improved in their area. But then again, some of them are hard core data abusers and sprint won't tolerate that crap anymore.

 

Just make a promotion like "sign a contract with new SPRINT/TMOBILE combined company" for any top notch phone for $49 and a truly unlimited everything plan for $50, plus if you have a framily plan it will be $40 if you have 3 people or more.

 

Let's do the math, $1 billion can do 2,000,000 subscribers with allowance on $500/each for the low phone price. Prepare $2 billion budget to run this promotion for 12 months.

 

Most people will give a try right away if you give out some real deals. The hard part is how to make them feel the network is good enough to stay with for long term.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever they do, I hope they get it over with. I am a supporter of the deal, but man I am tired of all the waiting...

You and me both. The waiting is the hard part.

 

 

Sent from my Josh's iPad using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Imitation had better be the sincerest form of flattery because somebody is stealing my references...

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...